The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1811 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Following on from that, I would suggest that absence is an example of a potentially political, internal or behavioural choice by an MSP. I do not sense strong disagreement to that view, but there is a range of views from the witnesses as to whether it should be included in the bill as a trigger for a recall process. Someone is bound to suggest that to me, so I will seek your views independently of this place.
It goes back, in part, to Emma Roddick’s point about proportionality. Should the bill consider what happens if an MSP chooses to change or leave their political party—or, to give an entire view of the matter, if they are expelled—or, again, should the internal mechanics of this place deal with that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
If it is short.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
I welcome everyone to our second evidence session. Annabel Mullin, director of communications, Elect Her, joins us online. In the room, we have Juliet Swann, nations and regions programme manager, Transparency International UK, and Willie Sullivan, director, Electoral Reform Society in Scotland. Good morning and welcome to you all. If you wish to answer a question—as I always say, there is no necessity to do so—type R in the chat if you are online, or indicate to me if you are in the room, and I will bring you in. We continue to be joined by Graham Simpson, who is the member in charge of the bill.
We will kick straight off with questions. I will start with an overarching question: do you support a recall mechanism for MSPs?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
I will go to Juliet Swann.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
My next question flows on from that one. Part of the issue is the public understanding of what the bill is about. What sort of public awareness measures do we need to have in place for the bill to work successfully? How do we ensure that people do not misunderstand the process and potentially apply a very personal, and maybe even personal political view towards someone, rather than seeing it as a step that is taken because behaviour choices have fallen below a level that we think is acceptable for an elected member?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
To push back on that slightly, you are talking more about the requirement for an educated electorate. There are challenges in that area, particularly in circumstances that involve the views of disabled or ethnic minority candidates.
You also talked about schools. Is there anything in the recall system proposals that education should specifically target, or is it the case that, actually, unless everything else is put right, that would be blowing in the wind, so to speak?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
If the MOT applies to all vehicles even through they are different, that gives confidence.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Graham, do you have questions arising from any of that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Excellent. Thank you.
I will ask some very closed questions—that shows my questioning training. I will look at the role of conveners. There is an exciting question coming, which will be the third one, but the first one is this: how do your parties choose your convener nominations?
Ash, I come to you first, because, in a sense, you are in a unique position, so you have the opportunity to say how parties should choose their conveners, and then I will come to the other members.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Okay. Ross?