The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1156 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
It is good to hear that you all support the bill. I do not think that you are putting up barriers; it is perhaps the practicalities of implementing the bill that everybody is concerned about.
In your written submissions and in your opening statements today, everybody mentioned a lack of engagement. Police Scotland said in its submission last week that there was a lack of engagement and that it wanted more communication. I think that it was Police Scotland that said that part 2 had been “‘tacked’ onto the end” of the bill.
My quick question on engagement is this: do you have a note of how many meetings and how much correspondence you have had with the Scottish Government on part 2 of the bill? Is that information available?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
Do we just need to review and refine what we have already, rather than implement the bill? Do we need to legislate or to refine what we already have? I have a concern that everybody is spending all their time doing reviews, but nobody is implementing the actions from that work so we do not get the outcome that we need.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
No current review process would have covered that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
Some of the written evidence has raised concerns about adding a new system of reviews to an already complex review landscape. Do you share those concerns? If so, what could we do to alleviate potential problems?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
We do not want to have overlapping reviews, but do you think that there is a risk that we spend too much time doing reviews and not enough time focusing on the action points from those reviews?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
Do you have any comments on that, Dr Fletcher?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
That is fine—thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
Graeme Simpson, do you want to comment?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
Dr Scott, do you have any comments on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
Fiona Drouet, in your submission, you mention the university
“failing to recognise so many warning signs, missing opportunities to intervene”.
Would the reviews that are currently available cover that? If not, would the reviews that are included in the bill cover that?