The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1659 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
So you will keep at it, but the jury is out.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
Jan, in your opinion, what barriers have prevented full implementation of the coming home implementation plan and how should accountability for the failures be enforced?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
From my experience of being on the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee. I know that social workers are at the core of the system, but figures from the Scottish Association of Social Work paint an alarming picture. For example, 25 per cent of social workers leave the profession within six years of graduation, and 19 per cent of the profession is over the age of 55. The total vacancy rate is just under 10 per cent, and, in Angus, in my area, it is 15.7 per cent. Many of those vacancy rates are long standing. Social workers are at the core of the system, so that constant churn of social workers is alarming.
In your view, has the Scottish Government failed to follow up on the coming home implementation plan? The infrastructure, including the workforce, is simply not in place for it to do so.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
I previously sat on the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and we completed an inquiry into self-directed support last year. It is clear that the system is not working. SDS is not working, and vulnerable people are being badly let down. The SHRC report highlighted specific issues with self-directed support. What are your concerns about SDS, and how can they be remedied?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
I have a final question on this area. During the committee’s evidence session on the proposed but delayed learning disabilities, autism and neurodivergence bill, we heard the alarming figures that 90 per cent of women with learning disabilities have been subjected to sexual abuse and that just under 70 per cent of them experienced sexual abuse before they turned 18. Did the SHRC’s research for this report encounter safeguarding concerns in institutional settings?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
You have, Cathy. The buck stops with the Scottish Government and Scottish ministers.
My final question is, what communication have you had with Audit Scotland on that? Are you aware of whether it intends to undertake work on this area following your report? As you say, questions need to be asked.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
The Scottish Government has not changed direction and it seems to be focusing on centralisation. Do you think that you have been heard by the Scottish Government?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
Do you believe that the onus is on you to speak a bit more loudly, rather than the onus being on the Scottish Government to say, “We have heard you, and we are now going to take action”?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
I have a quick follow-up question. If part of the issue is that there are not enough—or there is a high turnover of—social workers, so they are spread too thinly, who will do the action plans?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
My next question is about resources. The SHRC’s findings on the community living change fund, which you referred to earlier, are startling. Significant sums have been left unspent and there has been a lack of transparency and accountability relating to the fund overall. Furthermore, money has been used to renovate institutional settings, which the SHRC says is
“in direct contravention of the requirements of the right to independent living.”
That is alarming. It is absolutely shocking.
How should funding be allocated and monitored to ensure that that will not happen again? Have you raised your concerns directly with the Scottish Government? If so, what was its response?