The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3262 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
While sitting in the chamber earlier today and listening to the nationalists going over the same old arguments about independence, I decided to look at the agreement between both our Governments that set up the 2014 referendum. It said:
“The governments are agreed that the referendum should ... have a clear legal base”,
that it
“should be legislated for by the Scottish Parliament”
and that it should be
“conducted so as to command the confidence of parliaments, governments and people”
and
“deliver a fair test and a decisive expression of the views of people in Scotland and a result that everyone will respect.”
That is the problem—the nationalists have never respected the result of the referendum and have embarked on a journey of grievance politics to make their case for another one.
We should not really be surprised. After all, all the SNP exists for is to try to rip our country apart. It exists not to improve the lives of Scots, to run our country well or to bring economic growth, but to sow division and use every tool in its nationalist toolbox to cause that division, even by using the doomed deposit return scheme as a weapon.
Its Scottish Green chums are no better. It must be the only Green party in the world to care more about division and gender ideology than about climate issues. [Interruption.] I am not going to take an intervention at the moment.
I do like the part of the motion that talks about understanding
“that support for Scottish independence has consistently polled at 45% to 50% of Scotland’s population in the decade since”.
That tells me that support to remain part of the United Kingdom has consistently polled at 50 per cent to 55 per cent, which shows that, despite a pandemic, a war in Ukraine, three new First Ministers, six Prime Ministers, Brexit, four general elections—one of which was meant to be a de facto referendum—Jamie Hepburn as independence minister and the constant stream of independence papers that even Humza Yousaf admitted nobody reads, the desire for independence has not increased one little bit.
It is time for this Parliament to focus on what it was created to do—to improve the lives of Scots with the power that it has and to put aside the constitutional grievance that is holding Scotland back.
George Adam rose—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Okay. Does anybody else have a view on the timetabling?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Do you feel that there will be enough opportunities for you to play into the process of setting the target, given that it will be in regulations and not in the bill?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Does anybody else want to respond to that question? It appears not.
In the position paper, the Scottish Government says that it does not intend to align with the UK carbon budget periods. Do you have a view on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
I will pick up something that Bob Doris mentioned. I was going to ask about surpluses and deficits, but I think that we have mostly covered that under banking and borrowing. Should surpluses and deficits be allowed to be carried forward to the next budget? Mike Robinson, you made it clear in your submission that you do not agree with that, but I am interested to hear what others have to say.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Could there be any unintended consequences if a Government has almost met its targets quite near the end of a period and might actually delay some interventions until the next cycle?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Are we delaying the report, or is the bill delaying it?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
In the previous evidence session, we heard that Northern Ireland had a shorter first period—it is three years, I think—to bring the countries into alignment. You could do that—you could go from 2025 to 2028, then go into a five-year cycle. Why have you discounted that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Would we see any section 36 reports being done within the five-year period, or would we have to wait for the five-year period target to be missed before we would see a section 36 report?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
A complex mix of devolved and reserved policy levers are needed for Scotland to achieve its emissions reduction targets. How critical is it that the Scottish and UK Governments work together on climate policy?