The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1734 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
I ask that question wearing two hats. As well as being a member of this committee, I am convener of the Social Justice and Social Security Committee, which is considering the Charities (Regulation and Administration) (Scotland) Bill, a significant focus of which is OSCR and the associated reporting aspects. The UK bill could have a knock-on effect in that regard.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
That concludes our public business for today.
09:02 Meeting continued in private until 10:01.Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
I wish a very good morning to everyone, and I welcome you to the 12th meeting in 2023 of the Social Justice and Social Security Committee. We have received apologies from Katy Clark for today’s meeting.
Our first item of business is a decision on whether to take agenda items 3, 4, 5 and 6 in private. Do members agree to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
Our next item of business is consideration of a negative Scottish statutory instrument.?The instrument makes amendments to working age and pension age regulations as a result of the introduction of the Bereavement Benefits (Remedial) Order 2023 in February.
The 2023 order allows for cohabiting parents with dependent children who need support following the death of their partner to qualify for Department for Work and Pensions bereavement benefits. Previously, only bereaved parents who were married or in a civil partnership could qualify for those benefits. The order also allows retrospective claims to be paid as a lump sum in some circumstances, and it will prevent such a payment from affecting entitlement to or eligibility for a council tax reduction, which would normally be dependent on a person’s capital.
The instrument is laid under the negative procedure, which means that its provisions will come into force unless the Parliament agrees to a motion to annul it. No motion to annul the instrument has been lodged.
As members have no comments to make on the instrument, I?invite the committee to agree that it does not wish to make any recommendations in relation to the regulations. Do members agree to note the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
You touched on the idea of tinkering with section 5. As I have mentioned, we could see whether electronic monitoring could be more sophisticated, particularly given that stats show that addiction, particularly alcohol use at 62 per cent, is high up there as a contributing factor to violent crime. We could look at more sophisticated use of electronic monitoring, such as sobriety cuffs or, as you have mentioned, the monitoring of geographical location. Do you not consider that there is scope to do that instead of simply removing section 5? That is why I did not move amendment 67.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
When I initially lodged the amendment, I thought that I would like to see section 5 removed. I have now done more groundwork on the issue and have looked further into it. I have serious concerns—especially in relation to public safety and victim safety—about cases of domestic abuse and sexual violence where bail and release involves the use of electronic monitoring. Although that is a restriction of liberty, that restriction might be for only nine hours or so, which means that victims of domestic abuse or sexual violence would still be at risk of coercive behaviour or harassment.
I still have huge concerns and, although I will not move amendment 67, I will seek more help from the cabinet secretary on the issue. Particularly in cases of violent crime, bail should not involve electronic monitoring but should be commensurate with the crime.
I will not move amendment 67, but I seek movement on that section of the bill. [Interruption.]
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
I have had time to reflect on my amendment and to seek further advice, and I have decided that I will not move amendment 52. However, I will keep an eye on how the issue develops at stage 3.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
I have no further comments. I will not press amendment 67.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
Will the member take an intervention?