Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 7 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1233 contributions

|

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 30 September 2025

Karen Adam

Would anyone else like to come in on that point?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 30 September 2025

Karen Adam

Are you aware of any evidence that the additional exemption to the compatibility duty is required?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Interests

Meeting date: 16 September 2025

Karen Adam

Good morning, and welcome to the 19th meeting in 2025, in session 6, of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. We have no apologies this morning. I welcome Rhoda Grant MSP to her first meeting of the committee.

The first item of business is a declaration of interests. I invite Rhoda Grant to declare any relevant interests.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Interests

Meeting date: 16 September 2025

Karen Adam

Apologies, Rhoda. There was an issue with your sound. Try now.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Interests

Meeting date: 16 September 2025

Karen Adam

Thank you, Rhoda. That concludes our formal business in public this morning. We will now move into private to consider the remaining item on our agenda.

10:29 Meeting continued in private until 12:02.  

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Interests

Meeting date: 16 September 2025

Karen Adam

Yes, we can hear you now.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Interests

Meeting date: 16 September 2025

Karen Adam

The sound has gone again. Try now.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 9 September 2025

Karen Adam

We will move to questions from Tess White.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 9 September 2025

Karen Adam

Before we move on to questions from Pam Gosal, I have a question of my own. Taking on board everything that you have said so far, how can we demonstrate that minimum core obligations can be met with regard to how equality impact assessments work in all spheres of government?

In my previous life as a local councillor, we always looked at equality impact assessments at the end of the process, after reports had been presented to us. Emma Congreve said that the structures are not set up for what we are trying to achieve in this respect. I can see that the structures do not include equality impact assessments in those areas that we should be concerned about, which should feed into the building of services in the first place. Often, such assessments are add-ons, but it costs additional money to add things on, and when there are cutbacks, they are the first things to go.

I want to look at how that can be changed and how equality impact assessments can be embedded into the structure of all spheres of government from the very beginning. How do you see that happening? Would that be possible, and would it help with a human rights budgeting approach? We are looking at accountability for local government in that regard. For example, I have seen some equality impact assessments on the closure of sheltered housing complexes. When a council goes ahead with such a closure even though it is evident that it will have detrimental impacts, where is the accountability? What rights do people have? My question is about where equality impact assessments should sit and to what extent they can be used to provide that accountability.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 9 September 2025

Karen Adam

That was really helpful—thank you.