The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1335 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Marie McNair
The UK Government’s latest contracts for difference round received no bids for offshore wind projects. Now, Rishi Sunak has pulled the rug from under the net zero ambitions of the UK and Scotland. All of the evidence tells us that we can protect and create jobs in Scotland if we ensure that we get the energy transition right and help to cut energy bills and emissions at the same time. What are the biggest barriers that are holding back that massive potential and preventing our energy future delivering for the people of Scotland?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Marie McNair
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on what it is doing to tackle the gender pay gap and promote equal pay. (S6O-02553)
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Marie McNair
I welcome the Scottish Government’s efforts to close the gender pay gap with a real determination to make progress. It is clear that the United Kingdom Government is holding progress back, and the Labour Party’s appalling record on equal pay is a concern, too. Does the minister agree that, if we aspire to end the gender pay gap using all the tools that are available, it is essential that employment law be devolved to this Parliament?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Marie McNair
Good morning. Most of the comments that I was going to make on workforce planning have been covered. The pandemic has just been touched on. It brought significant changes for the workforce, including a shift to remote and hybrid working, and significantly increased demands on local government services. How has that impacted on staff wellbeing? Are there any groups that may have been impacted disproportionately?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Marie McNair
I bring members’ attention to my entry in the register of members’ interests. I was a West Dunbartonshire Council councillor until May 2022.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Marie McNair
I draw members’ attention to my entry in the register of members’ interests. I am a member of the Unison trade union.
I congratulate Keith Brown on securing the debate and acknowledge his long-standing commitment to workers’ rights and fair employment policy.
The devolution of employment law would give the Scottish Parliament the ability to protect workers’ rights, increase the living wage, end statutory living wage age discrimination, give us the powers to act on companies that use fire-and-rehire policies, tackle the gender pay gap, support parental leave and better trade union recognition policies, and much more.
The Tories’ anti-trade union policies, which were never repealed by the Labour Party, have undermined workers’ rights and allowed for an employment landscape in which the needs of workers can be placed last. The Trade Union Act 2016 and Brexit legislation show that the Tories care only about continuing in the same direction. Scotland needs a different path, and that will be helped by the full devolution of employment law.
The Labour Party arrogantly claims to be the party of trade unions, but it turns up here showing that it does not care about the opinions of trade unions that are clear that they want employment law to be devolved. Roz Foyer of the STUC is clear that devolution gives
“the chance to draw a line in the sand and ensure no worker in Scotland could ever be subject to any pernicious attack again from a Tory government hell-bent on undermining working people.”
However, despite the views of all trade unions, the TUC and the Labour Party, it has dropped the ball in another screeching U-turn in policy. The Campaign for Socialism, which some of the lapsed Corbynistas purport to be members of, said:
“This move would put the SPLP at odds with the STUC, TUC and Scottish Labour members ... MSPs must pick a side & abide by their manifesto commitment.”
We can see what side they have picked. Effectively, their memberships have lapsed.
Instead, we are expected to trust Westminster Labour to deliver, even though its record on keeping promises is shoddy. The party that now backs Brexit and the rape clause cannot be trusted on workers’ rights. Professor Keith Ewing of King’s College London has pointed out that the recent omission by Sir Keir Starmer to commit to a “single status of ‘worker’”
“would render completely pointless the commitments relating to zero-hours contracts, hire and rehire, and flexible working arrangements.”
On fire and rehire, Labour has questionable principles. When it comes to its own staff, The Independent alleged that Labour used fire and rehire, with one senior MP saying:
“To learn that our party are now using what can only be described as ‘fire and rehire tactics’ appals me. It’s everything we as a party should be aggressively opposing. Sacking individuals and hiring others with worse wages, terms and conditions are the actions of the worst of the very worst employers.”
When asked to rebut that, a Labour Party spokesman said:
“We don’t comment on staffing.”
We also know about the Labour Party’s shameful record on equal pay, so we will not trust Labour on workers’ rights. Instead, I stand with the trade unions and call for the full devolution of employment law to give this Parliament the means to provide fair work and decent pay and conditions.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Marie McNair
Let us have the ambition to go further to support workers, with independence. Powers over health and safety law will mean that we can do much more to keep our workplaces safe. Power over social security policies will mean that we can do much more to support low-paid workers.
Crumbs from Westminster’s table are not for us. They are not enough for Scottish workers. A better path is an independent Scotland.
18:17Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 21 September 2023
Marie McNair
Good morning. I thank the witnesses for their time. I will cover the issue of overpayments, but my general observation is that there is much to do after safe and secure transfer. Carers allowance has been around for a long time, and it does not meet the needs of carers. Given the long-standing flaws, has the UK Government made any efforts to consider major reforms?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 21 September 2023
Marie McNair
With your indulgence, convener, I have one further question. There was a really good discussion there about overpayment, but does the risk of overpayment outweigh the benefit of allowing advance applications and advance payments? That question is to whoever can answer it.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 21 September 2023
Marie McNair
Good morning to the witnesses, and thanks for your time. The programme for government committed to inflation-linked uprating for some benefits and referred to
“increasing the Scottish Child Payment, Funeral Support Payment and all disability and carers benefits in line with inflation.”
Do you expect all devolved social security benefits to be uprated in line with inflation? For completeness, do you expect the UK Government to uprate all reserved social security benefits in line with inflation? I put that question to Bill Scott.