Skip to main content
Loading…
Chamber and committees

Audit Committee, 04 Sep 2001

Meeting date: Tuesday, September 4, 2001


Contents


Scottish Enterprise Skillseekers Training

The Convener:

Item 2 on our agenda relates to our report on the Scottish Enterprise skillseekers training programme. At our meeting on 6 March we considered a preliminary response from the Executive. At that meeting we agreed that we would address points arising from the response when considering the Executive's more substantive response. That response deals first with the roll-out of Scottish Enterprise's corporate training programme and the benefits to be had from it, and secondly with Scottish Enterprise's commitment to improving its system of management information and to ensuring that that information is disseminated.

The more substantive response that we have received appears to be positive. It indicates that the corporate training system will bring about better monitoring of cost-effectiveness and better management information. I am happy to note that £2.75 million has been freed up for priority areas as a result of better management. Do members have any comments?

Scott Barrie:

Our report on the skillseekers training programme was far more critical than our report on the Scottish Ambulance Service—with good reason. It is heartening that Scottish Enterprise has responded positively and addressed the deficiencies that we identified in its management information systems. We were told that Scottish Enterprise was in the process of making changes to those systems, but at the time of the Auditor General's inquiry they had not been fully implemented. It is good to see that what we were told in evidence has borne fruit. Scottish Enterprise has developed information systems that are much better than those it had previously.

There has been a solid improvement.

I raised the issue of tracking young people to ensure that training was being provided effectively and that best value was being obtained. There is no reference to that in Scottish Enterprise's report.

The Convener:

Both Paul Martin and Keith Raffan highlighted that issue and we should keep an eye on it. The tracking of trainees and the extent to which encouragement to complete training is given are issues that are not addressed specifically in the report.

Mr Arwel Roberts (Audit Scotland):

I take the point that Paul Martin makes about the need to track the individuals who are involved in the programme. I invite the committee to let Audit Scotland monitor developments in that area. We can come back with additional information as and when it appears.

Thank you. When the annual departmental report appears we will have an opportunity to review progress. However, there has been a promising and positive move forward.