The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 13 contributions
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2026
Andrew Baxter
What is your one-line message to the Government, Stuart? Is it that it should simply leave Scottish Forestry alone, or is it that, if it is going to do it, it needs move at pace, as quickly as possible, in order to restore that confidence?
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2026
Andrew Baxter
I want to follow up on Mr Goodall’s comments about loss of confidence in the industry. Does that mean that we are already seeing delay in industry investment decisions? Public sector reform is likely to be a lengthy process and we have no certainty on the timescale. How long would a delay in any certainty on this area have to be before it led to a crisis of investment in the industry?
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2026
Andrew Baxter
If long-term monitoring is so important, do you believe that Scottish Government ministers in particular recognise its importance and the need to fund it? Is there any risk that NatureScot’s long-term monitoring work will be restricted, or even threatened, because you are dealing with year-to-year funding settlements rather than longer multi-year funding settlements?
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2026
Andrew Baxter
I have a specific question for Mr Lowe. Is there not a significant mismatch between the policy framework that you have just outlined and the reality on the ground? We are seeing Forestry and Land Scotland restrict leisure access, in effect, because it does not have the funding to maintain tracks and path networks, and it is removing bridges in much of its forestry across Scotland.
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2026
Andrew Baxter
We have moved on from the question that I was going to ask, which was about the effectiveness of restoration beyond the success measure that Mr Hutchinson pointed out, which concerned the sheer hectare numbers. Professor Andersen and Mr Ford gave examples of how we can look at the effectiveness beyond that measure.
I am particularly interested in what happens beyond restoration. I would like to know how we are monitoring those restored sites and for how long we are doing that, and whether we can assess the proportion of those restored sites that have perhaps failed to achieve the expected outcomes.
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2026
Andrew Baxter
Finlay Carson has slightly touched on the area that I would like to concentrate on, but I will say that it is somewhat unusual that neither the committee nor individual members have received correspondence from the sector on the new guidance. That means either that the sector is completely satisfied or that there is a lack of knowledge of the new guidance among the public. Could you provide more detail of the collaboration with the sector and of the wider consultation beyond veterinary advice and the views of the National Equine Welfare Council, so that we can be satisfied that the new guidance has received the public scrutiny that it deserves outside Parliament?
09:15
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2026
Andrew Baxter
We have come full circle, having started off with public sector reform. Such reform should be about not just reorganisation and the merger of functions, but, equally, the effectiveness of public sector funding.
In that light, I have two questions, and I will leave it to you gentlemen to decide which, if any, you want to answer. First, we have talked a lot about the number of hectares planted, but how effectively are we measuring what those publicly supported woodlands will deliver over five, 10 or 15 years in terms of survival rates, timber production and biodiversity as well as carbon and community benefit? Secondly, should future forestry grants include clearer and publicly reported outcome measures instead of simply regarding the planting of a hectare as the end result?
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2026
Andrew Baxter
I have a follow-up question in response to Pete Ritchie’s comment about the plan being a failure in policy making. What action do you think Government ministers need to take now to correct that, other than what you said about linking strategic outcomes to the funding? You must have other things in mind that you think the Government needs to take immediate action on to make sure that the plan does not continue to stagnate into the future.
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2026
Andrew Baxter
To follow up on that, we are getting feedback that, although the concept of whole farm plans is sound, without adequate funding to enable farmers to actually undertake that process, it would be rather fruitless. If the committee were to go to Government ministers and say that we need a reprofiling of the funding to allow that to happen and they say no, where do we go from there?
Do we say that the whole farm plan process is no longer fit for purpose and that we should no longer proceed? How do we redesign it in the best way possible to enable it to provide the outcomes that we initially hoped for?
Rural Affairs Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2026
Andrew Baxter
I want to follow up with Jonnie Hall on his advocacy for additional funding. Are you asking for that to apply to all four tiers, or should there be a focus on tier 3 or an emphasis on tier 4, which David McKay and Dave Reay are, I think, advocating?