This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
On consultation, one of the legal views that was given in the case of R v West Sussex health authority states:"Consultation is the communication of a genuine invitation to give advice and a genuine receipt of the advice … to achieve consultation sufficient information must be supplied by the consulting to the consulted party."
People from Plato to Rousseau and more modern educationists such as A S Neill and R F MacKenzie have all spoken up for the place not only of music but of drama, physical education and art.
Members might be aware from press reports of a recent case in the House of Lords—R v A—which concerned the ECHR compatibility of comparable English provisions in section 41 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999.
The Policy Memorandum did however reference research into trends in the national provision of outdoor education published in 2018. This found1Davies R. (2018). Residential Outdoor Education in Scotland: change over time and the impacts of socio-economic deprivation on access. .
The personalisation agenda focuses less on targets but instead offers flexibility to both service users and implementing agencies 1Eccles, A., & Taylor, R. (2018). Personalisation: Back to the future?.
Hunter Watson
CORP005 David Byrne, Emeritus Professor of Applied Social Sciences, Durham University
CORP006 Ms R J Pengelly - ScotSectorLink
CORP007 Professor Catriona Paisey, University of Glasgow
CORP008 NHS National Services Scotland
CORP009 Chris Bridgeford, Founder, affasair
CORP010 The Royal College of Psychiatrists in Scotland
CORP011 British ...
Our submission refers to the English case of R v Jones. During a speech in that case, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry pointed out the differences between Scottish and English procedures.