Skip to main content
Loading…

Search

There are 4,713 results relating to "V"

|

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Official Report Meeting date: 11 November 2010

Meeting of the Parliament 11 November 2010

(S3O-11878) The Scottish Government has announced a fully independent review of law and practice in the wake of the decision in Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate. The review will be led by Lord Carloway, who is a senior High Court judge, and will encompass many of the issues that are addressed in the 2010 act.
Official Report Meeting date: 6 October 2010

Economy, Energy and Tourism Committee 06 October 2010

It would certainly be a significant change from what is normally viewed as necessary in Scotland, but we are coming into uncharted waters with the case of Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate. However, the provisions in the bill do not reflect what would normally be required in terms of corroborated evidence.
Official Report Meeting date: 29 September 2010

Rural Affairs and Environment Committee 29 September 2010

The 1981 act refers to “trap or snare” in section 11, “Prohibition of certain methods of killing or taking wild animals”, whereas the equivalent regulation in the habitats regulations refers to“traps which are non–selective according to their principle or their conditions of use”.The problem is that, although we can license the use of certain prohibited methods under the habitats regulations, the use of only the word “traps” in the regulations and the fact that the 1981 act appears to suggest that traps and snares are not the same thing mean that there is doubt about whether we can license the use of snares to take, in particular, mountain hares, which are an annex V...
Official Report Meeting date: 22 June 2010

Justice Committee 22 June 2010

Of course, we have protections in Scotland and, as the First Minister said in response to Miss Goldie last week, the simple fact is that, in the case of the Crown v McLean, all seven judges at the Court of Session were persuaded that there had been no breach of the suspect’s human rights in his not speaking to a solicitor before being interviewed by the pol...
Official Report Meeting date: 24 February 2010

Health and Sport Committee 24 February 2010

I notice that the European Court of Justice has yet to issue its decision in the case of the Commission of the European Communities v the French Republic, Republic of Austria and Ireland.
Official Report Meeting date: 20 January 2010

Rural Affairs and Environment Committee, 20 Jan 2010

It is in connection with the Whitbread v MacDonald case, which I suppose is something of a cause célèbre.
Official Report Meeting date: 26 May 2009

Justice Committee, 26 May 2009

The extended powers in the bill originate from a need to keep us consistent with the European convention on human rights, specifically in relation to the case of S and Marper v the United Kingdom, in which the European Court of Human Rights criticised the blanket retention of DNA in England and praised the specific and targeted Scottish regime on DNA profil...
Official Report Meeting date: 13 January 2009

Public Petitions Committee, 13 Jan 2009

I will read out what the author says about the last hours of George V on 20 January 1936 at Sandringham house, Norfolk:"The king's health had been deteriorating for some years … and by the beginning of 1936 he clearly had little time left … His hand shook so badly that he could no longer write his diary and his doctor, Lord Dawson … issued a bulletin from S...
Date published: 12 April 2024

The Alcohol (Minimum Pricing)(Scotland) Act 2012 (Continuation) Order 2024

Scotch Whisky Association and others (Appellants) v The Lord Advocate and another (Respondents)(Scotland) [2017] UKSC 76 - Press summary.
Date published: 7 November 2022

Retained EU Law and the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

On the whole the Court of Appeal held that the power to depart from retained EU case law should ‘be exercised with great caution’ (Chelluri v Air India, per Lord Justice Coulson).

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].