- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 12 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Siobhian Brown on 24 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the XL bully dog breed having been added to the list of dogs banned under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, what evidence it is aware of that adding a dog breed to this list has reduced dog attacks, and whether it will provide details of all dog attacks reported in Scotland since January 2004 to date, including (a) whether any resulted in a fatality and (b) the breed or cross breed of the dog(s) involved.
Answer
In light of the UK Government failing to ensure English and Welsh XL Bully dog owners cannot evade the new safeguards through selling or otherwise disposing of their dogs in Scotland, the Scottish Government has been left with little choice to decide to replicate the new safeguards in Scotland. Through replicating the new regime, this will ensure owners have no ability to evade the new controls.
More generally on the effectiveness of breed specific legislation, there is no central database within Scotland or the UK that provides available data on breakdown by breed or crossbreed dogs, involved in dog attacks.
However, National Records Scotland collects data in relation to ‘Deaths from being bitten or struck by a dog in Scotland’. There have been three deaths from being bitten or struck by a dog in Scotland between 2004 and 2022. Information for 2023 is not yet available. Data on the breed or type of dogs involved is not recorded.
In addition, Public Health Scotland collects data on the number of inpatient and day case admissions to hospital where a diagnosis of dog attack (bite or strike) was recorded. The available data from 2004 to 2022 is included in the following table:
Calendar year | Admissions |
2004 | 340 |
2005 | 399 |
2006 | 431 |
2007 | 421 |
2008 | 492 |
2009 | 501 |
2010 | 487 |
2011 | 559 |
2012 | 608 |
2013 | 598 |
2014 | 676 |
2015 | 706 |
2016 | 776 |
2017 | 765 |
2018 | 834 |
2019 | 905 |
2020 | 765 |
2021 | 854 |
2022 | 933 |
These figures are based solely on admissions to hospital for acute care as an inpatient or day case. Care should be taken when interpreting these figures as dog attacks can be treated also in other healthcare settings which are not included here, such as accident and emergency department, out of hours, outpatient or general practice services.
- Asked by: Sandesh Gulhane, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 09 January 2024
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 24 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to reports that (a) due to funding and personnel difficulties between NHS board property management departments and estates teams, there are currently no leases being taken by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde in accordance with The National Code of Practice for GP premises, forcing GP contractors to take out new third-party leases and (b) this is a Scotland-wide problem.
Answer
NHS Boards are responsible for implementing the National Code of Practice for GP premises.
The NHSScotland National Primary Care (GP) Premises Group has been set up to consider all matters relating to GP Premises including:
- Oversight of the implementation of the Code of Practice for GP Premises.
- Implementation of GP Sustainability Loans.
- Consideration and review of available guidance.
- Consideration of appropriate schedules of accommodation within Primary Care premises, and specifically that of General Practice occupied areas and how this may affect reimbursement.
- Provide a platform for the Scottish Government to present papers/proposals to the group.
- Provide a platform for the BMA to present papers to the group.
- Provide a platform for the NHS Boards to present papers to the group.
- Ensure the Rent Review Process is consistent and supports the intent of the GP contract where required.
- Standardise approaches, e.g. standardise leases across Scotland.
Health Boards are represented on a regional basis alongside the BMA, the Scottish Government and other stakeholders.
- Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Cunninghame North, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 04 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 24 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government how much it has invested in flood prevention in each year since 1999.
Answer
Local authorities are responsible for the development and delivery of flood protection schemes. The Scottish Government has made available the following amounts to local authorities for flood protection scheme and other actions.
1999-2000 | £4 million |
2000-2001 | £4 million |
2001-2002 | £8.5 million |
2002-2003 | £9 million |
2003-2004 | £10 million |
2004-2005 | £14 million |
2005-2006 | £14 million |
2006-2007 | £33 million |
2007-2008 to 2020-2021 | £42 million |
2021-2022 | £52 million |
2022-2023 | £63 million |
2023-2024 | £61 million |
The mechanism by which the Scottish Government has funded flood protection schemes has changed over time.
Prior to 2008 funds were available to local authorities through the single non-housing capital allocation which could be used for flood prevention. In addition, the Scottish Government made specific provision for major flood prevention and coast protection schemes as set out in the table.
The table reflects the £42 million per year which Scottish Government has made available through the general capital grant to enable local authorities to invest in flood protection measures since 2008-09. It also includes the additional £150 million committed to over the course of this Parliament to support the delivery of flood resilience actions. The £150 million is allocated on an annual basis, as set out in the Capital Spending Review published in 2021 (£10m (2021-2022); £21m (2022-23); £19m (2023-24); £46.5m (2024-25); £53.5m (2025-26)).
- Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 03 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 24 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has conducted any analysis on how its proposed increase in rail fares for 2024-25 will potentially impact on the number of rail journeys in the Highlands and Islands region.
Answer
The Scottish Government continues to keep fares comparatively lower on average than across the rest of Great Britain, as we have done for over a decade. ScotRail and Caledonian Sleeper provide fares offers throughout the year. For example cheaper advance fares, ‘Kids for a quid’, and Highland Railcard which offers residents 50% reduction on specified routes.
We know that any increase is unwelcome for passengers, but it comes against the backdrop of real constraints in the total block grant from the UK Government. If we did not implement this increase, we would need to consider alternatives such as reducing services and cutting back on investment in the railway and its people.
The increase has been delayed from the traditional January increase until April, follows a below inflation increase last summer and a period fare freezes for flexi-pass and season tickets.
- Asked by: Liz Smith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 24 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the possible introduction of a non-domestic rates public health supplement on retailers as set out in the 2024-25 Budget, whether it has assessed, or will assess, the potential impact of any new levy on the pay of store staff, including any bonuses that they may earn.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-24498 on 23 January 2024. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers .
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 24 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions it had with the Competition and Markets Authority regarding the possible introduction of a non-domestic rates public health supplement on retailers prior to the announcement in the 2024-25 Budget.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-24110 on 18 January 2024. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers .
- Asked by: Daniel Johnson, MSP for Edinburgh Southern, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 24 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the proposed introduction of a non-domestic rates public health supplement on retailers, as set out in its Budget for 2024-25, what assessment it has made of any potential implications of the introduction of such a levy for retailers' investment plans.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-24498 on 23 January 2024. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers .
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 12 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Siobhian Brown on 24 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the introduction in England and Wales of restrictions on XL bully dogs, and the First Minister’s announcement on 11 January 2024 that it will, in essence, replicate in Scotland the legislation that exists in England and Wales on XL bully dogs, when any scheme will be operational in Scotland; whether it will be part of the UK-wide scheme or standalone; who will be responsible for maintaining a register of ownership, and what discussions it has had with potential keepers of a register about whether such a register will be made publicly available.
Answer
Replicating the approach taken in England and Wales, it will be possible for owners of XL Bully dogs to retain their dogs by applying for an exemption. Details of how this can be done will be published as the scheme is launched and practical and helpful support will be provided by the Scottish Government for XL Bully dog owners.
The effect of an exemption being granted will be that an XL Bully dog will be added to the already operating index of exempt dogs. This index has operated since the 1990s and it is operated on a day-to-day basis by the UK Government for Scotland (this reflects the fact that the exemption index was established prior to devolution). There are currently no plans to change how the index operates.
Making the index publicly available would require consideration of a number of issues including data protection. The Scottish Government would be happy to raise this issue with the operator of the index as part of the process of delivering the new XL Bully dogs safeguards in Scotland.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 12 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Siobhian Brown on 24 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the First Minister’s announcement on 11 January 2024 that it will, in essence, replicate in Scotland the legislation that exists in England and Wales on XL bully dogs, whether it has decided not to proceed to amend the Control of Dogs (Scotland) Act 2010 as an alternative means of protecting the public, and, if this is the case, for what reason it has taken that decision.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-24485 on 24 January 2023. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers .
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 12 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Siobhian Brown on 24 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government who it expects would be responsible for the enforcement of any regulations in Scotland regarding XL bully dogs.
Answer
The new safeguards to be introduced will include a number of criminal offences for breaching certain requirements. In line with normal process, it is for Police Scotland to investigate any alleged offences and for the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service to consider reports of alleged crimes with a view to deciding on appropriate prosecutorial action.