- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government how many children are currently on the waiting list for a first appointment with a community paediatrician in each NHS board area; what the (a) median and (b) 90th percentile waiting time is for these appointments, and how many children in each NHS board area have been waiting for more than (i) 52 weeks, (ii) 78 weeks, and (iii) 104 weeks.
Answer
Public Health Scotland (PHS) publishes statistics as part of the Stage of Treatment (SoT) publication for consultant-led waits under the individual specialties of community child health and paediatrics.
Data for these two specialties are grouped under the broader specialty of paediatrics because some NHS boards utilise the community child health specialty to record these waits, while others use the paediatrics specialty.
Table 1 has been derived from the SoT open data, presenting statistics for both individual specialties.
Table 2 provides statistics for the grouped specialty of paediatrics. These figures therefore reflect waits for both community child health and paediatrics combined.
Table 1: Number of ongoing waits for a new outpatient appointment under the specialties community child health and paediatrics by health board at census date 31 January 2026 |
NHS board of treatment | Specialty name | Waits | Median (days) | 90th Percentile (days) | Waits over 52 weeks | Waits over 78 weeks | Waits over 104 weeks |
NHS Scotland | Community child health | 2,992 | 123 | 359 | 287 | 1 | 0 |
NHS Grampian | Community child health | 2,338 | 135 | 324 | 134 | 1 | 0 |
NHS Highland | Community child health | 8 | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Lanarkshire | Community child health | 588 | 77 | 438 | 151 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Orkney | Community child health | 57 | 193 | 331 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Not Known | Community child health | 1 | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Scotland | Paediatrics | 10,214 | 58 | 204 | 146 | 2 | 0 |
NHS Ayrshire & Arran | Paediatrics | 850 | 46 | 123 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Borders | Paediatrics | 309 | 66 | 149 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Dumfries & Galloway | Paediatrics | 289 | 52 | 271 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Fife | Paediatrics | 700 | 52 | 170 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Forth Valley | Paediatrics | 474 | 24 | 75 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Grampian | Paediatrics | 895 | 39 | 137 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde | Paediatrics | 1,719 | 75 | 201 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Highland | Paediatrics | 159 | 20 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Lanarkshire | Paediatrics | 1,037 | 54 | 102 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Lothian | Paediatrics | 2,895 | 93 | 297 | 131 | 1 | 0 |
NHS Orkney | Paediatrics | 20 | 76 | 108 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Shetland | Paediatrics | 93 | 66 | 172 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Tayside | Paediatrics | 733 | 25 | 84 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
NHS Western Isles | Paediatrics | 41 | 24 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 2: Number of ongoing waits for a new outpatient appointment under the grouped specialty of paediatrics by health board at census date 31 January 2026 |
NHS board of treatment | Specialty grouping | Waits | Median (days) | 90th Percentile (days) | Waits over 52 weeks | Waits over 78 weeks | Waits over 104 weeks |
NHS Scotland | Paediatrics | 13,206 | 66 | 248 | 433 | 3 | 0 |
NHS Ayrshire & Arran | Paediatrics | 850 | 46 | 123 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Borders | Paediatrics | 309 | 66 | 149 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Dumfries & Galloway | Paediatrics | 289 | 52 | 271 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Fife | Paediatrics | 700 | 52 | 170 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Forth Valley | Paediatrics | 474 | 24 | 75 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Grampian | Paediatrics | 3,233 | 95 | 298 | 134 | 1 | 0 |
NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde | Paediatrics | 1,719 | 75 | 201 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Highland | Paediatrics | 167 | 18 | 73 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Lanarkshire | Paediatrics | 1,625 | 60 | 325 | 151 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Lothian | Paediatrics | 2,895 | 93 | 297 | 131 | 1 | 0 |
NHS Orkney | Paediatrics | 77 | 193 | 316 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Shetland | Paediatrics | 93 | 66 | 172 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
NHS Tayside | Paediatrics | 733 | 25 | 84 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
NHS Western Isles | Paediatrics | 41 | 24 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Not known | Paediatrics | 1 | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Please note that ongoing waits refer to patients who remain on the waiting list at a point in time (waiting list census) e.g. at 31 January 2025, and who have not yet attended their appointment. Note that a single patient can be on the waiting list multiple times due to multiple referrals for different specialties and different appointment types. Therefore, these statistics do not represent a count of patients, but rather a count of patient waits. Further information on SoT Waiting Times can be found on the PHS website.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what its most recent assessment is of the gynaecology workforce implementation gap that was identified by Audit Scotland; how many consultant gynaecologist vacancies, including locum-filled roles, there are in each NHS board, and what specific actions it is taking to recruit and retain specialist gynaecological nursing staff to support the new National Gynaecology Plan.
Answer
Audit Scotland has highlighted a persistent gap between national workforce ambitions and delivery, including the need for improved workforce data and clearer implementation plans. The Scottish Government is working with NHS boards to address these issues through strengthened workforce planning and improved modelling.
The information requested on how many obstetrics and gynaecology consultant vacancies there are in each NHS board is available on the TURAS NHS Education for Scotland workforce statistics site at: NHS Scotland workforce | Turas Data Intelligence (Vacancy tab).
Data on locum-filled roles is not centrally held.
On 20 January 2026 the Scottish Government published the Women’s Health Plan: Phase Two (2026 - 2029). Phase Two sets out the actions that we will take over the next three years to improve the health of women and girls in Scotland and commits to ensuring women and girls have timely access to gynaecological care.
The development of this plan is in the early stages; therefore, it is not yet possible to provide any specific actions around the gynaecological workforce.
The Scottish Government continues to focus on reducing long waits for all patients, including those awaiting gynaecology appointments and treatment, while a longer-term plan is developed.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 11 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on assurances it has had from Royal Mail that all postal deliveries linked to the forthcoming Scottish Parliament election, including postal ballots and other election material on behalf of all candidates and parties, will be delivered at no detriment to the delivery of other mail in Scotland, including medical appointments, legal and financial letters.
Answer
Further to the answers to questions S6W-43890 on 4 March 2026 and S6W-44014 on 11 March 2026, I met with Alistair Cochrane, Interim CEO of Royal Mail Group on 19 March. We discussed planning for the election and I highlighted the major concerns which have been raised around whether poll cards, postal votes and campaign material will be delivered on time. I received an assurance that Royal Mail recognise the vital role they play in the democratic process and that election mail will be prioritised. They are working closely with Returning Officers and the Electoral Management Board for Scotland ahead of 7 May.
All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 11 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions it has had with representatives, parents and local authorities following the reported announcement that Fernhill School in Rutherglen will close.
Answer
The Scottish Government is aware of the decision made by the proprietors to close Fernhill School, and recognises the impact this has for pupils, families, staff, and the wider school community.
The Registrar for Independent Schools has been in contact with the school, which will remain open until the end of this academic session, and has received assurance that relevant local authorities have been notified of the closure and that the school is supporting pupils and families in making arrangements for next year.
Qualifications Scotland has also been engaging with Fernhill School to ensure that young people undertaking their qualifications are being appropriately supported, and the Registrar and HM Inspectors will continue to engage with the school to provide advice and support as necessary.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the Scottish Walking and Wheeling Survey 2025, which suggested that 48% of adults over 65 would walk more if pavements were in better condition, and how it ensures that local authorities are meeting their Public Sector Equality Duty when making budget reductions to footway maintenance that disproportionately affect wheelchair users and people with visual impairments.
Answer
The Scottish Government recognises the benefits of walking for physical and mental wellbeing regularly reported in the Scotland Walking and Cycling Index. However, as with the response to PQ S6W-44458 on 24 March 2026 pavement maintenance is the responsibility of councils as entirely separate entities from the Scottish Government. The Scottish Government has committed to respecting local government’s democratic mandate as part of the Verity House Agreement.
Local authorities have statutory duties under the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 and the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 to maintain footways and secure expeditious, convenient and safe movement of people using their footways.
It is the responsibility of individual local authorities to manage their own budgets and to allocate the total financial resources available to them, on the basis of local needs and priorities, having first fulfilled their statutory obligations and the jointly agreed set of national and local priorities.
It is for all external bodies, including local authorities, to ensure that they comply with all legal requirements. This includes the Public Sector Equality Duty and the Equality Act 2010. Responsibility for oversight of compliance with the Equality Act 2010 rests with the Equality & Human Rights Commission. The Commission is independent and cannot be directed by Scottish Ministers. Private individuals can seek to enforce their rights under the Equality Act in courts and tribunals.
All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will issue updated guidance to local authorities to ensure that early learning and childcare (ELC) demand is formally integrated into the school roll forecasting process for new housing developments, and what steps it is taking to ensure that developer contributions are consistently secured for ELC infrastructure, as well as primary and secondary school capacity.
Answer
Local authorities have the statutory responsibility to manage their school and early learning and childcare (ELC) estate. While the Determining Primary School Capacity guidance focuses on primary school capacity, authorities are expected to consider ELC requirements in their wider estate planning and to secure any necessary developer contributions. The Scottish Government has no plans to issue updated guidance at this time, as decisions on forecasting and securing contributions sit with local authorities.
National Planning Framework 4 supports an Infrastructure First approach, recognising the importance of aligning development and infrastructure provision. Local development plans are expected to be informed by evidence on the infrastructure of the area, including ELC settings, primary and secondary schools. Where infrastructure is necessary to enable development, it is a decision for the planning authority whether it should be funded – in full or in part – through developer contributions, taking local needs and development viability into account.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government how its school roll forecasting guidance accounts for the cumulative impact of multiple windfall developments (sites not originally in the Local Development Plan) on a single school catchment area, and what measures are in place to prevent local schools from reaching working capacity before any promised infrastructure improvements are delivered.
Answer
Local authorities have the statutory responsibility to manage their school estate, including assessing the impact of all housing developments on school capacity.
The Scottish Government’s Determining Primary School Capacity guidance provides a consistent framework for assessing planning and working capacity, supporting local authorities to respond to pressures arising from windfall sites. Decisions on mitigating capacity pressures, including infrastructure timing, are matters for each local authority.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the impact of reported deteriorating pavement conditions on the number of unintentional trips and falls among people aged 65 and over, and what data it holds on the annual cost to each NHS board of treating injuries, such as hip fractures, specifically resulting from falls on poorly maintained or untreated public footways (a) in each year since 2021-22 and (b) since April 2025.
Answer
Councils have a duty under the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 to manage and maintain local roads and footways in their area; and duties under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 to secure expeditious, convenient and safe movement of traffic and people using their roads and footways.
Councils are entirely separate entities from the Scottish Government. Their powers are set out in statute and, it is up to each local authority to manage its own day to day business, including the maintenance of pavements. If pavements are of an unacceptable condition, complaints should be made directly to the council in question. Thereafter, if the matter remains unresolved, the complaint may be able to be referred to the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman.
The Scottish Government does not hold data on the cost to each NHS board of treating injuries, such as hip fractures, resulting from falls on poorly maintained or untreated public footways. Individual health boards/ambulance services may hold this data but, likely only in relation to the types of injuries treated and not the reasons for them.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, for what reason it has not yet acted on the call made by Endometriosis UK in its campaign, Menstrual Wellbeing in Scotland, which launched in 2020 and called for menstrual wellbeing education to be made a compulsory component of the curriculum in all of Scotland's schools; whether it plans for this to be formally integrated into the Relationships, Sexual Health and Parenthood (RSHP) framework and, if so, by what date it will do so.
Answer
The Scottish Government published updated statutory RSHP teaching guidance in February 2026. The revised teaching guidance reflects the issues currently facing children and young people, especially around inclusivity, consent and healthy relationships as well as online influences.
Regarding content of the Scottish curriculum, I refer the member to the answer to questions S6W-30034 on 3 October 2024, and S6W-32189 on 23 December 2024. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to reports that planning capacity formulas for existing schools do not account for modern educational requirements, such as breakout spaces and sensory rooms, and how it ensures that Section 75 developer contributions are sufficient to cover the true cost of modern school expansions, rather than just the basic physical classroom footprint.
Answer
Local authorities are responsible for managing their school estate in line with statutory duties and ensure that capacity assessments reflect modern educational design requirements. The Determining Primary School Capacity guidance recognises evolving approaches to school design and supports authorities in assessing planning and working capacity accordingly.
It is for individual planning authorities to determine whether to seek developer contributions towards infrastructure delivery to enable development, whilst also considering the level of contributions and the potential impact on the viability of development. Developer contributions sought via Section 75 planning obligations should comply with the tests set out in National Planning Framework 4 and Circular 4/2025.