- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 24 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-15780 by Lorna Slater on 22 March 2023, what its position is on conclusion 7 of the report, Stop, Sort, Burn, Bury? Independent Review of the Role of Incineration in the Waste Hierarchy in Scotland, that “Scotland should not construct more capacity than it needs and only some of the currently planned capacity should be built”, and, if it accepts this conclusion, what its position is on whether ascertaining which of those planned developments should be built can only be determined based on the forthcoming capacity cap, which may indicate a lower capacity than is currently in development.
Answer
The first report of the independent review of incineration conducted a capacity analysis. It recommended that the Scottish Government ensure no further planning permission (i.e. beyond that already in place) is granted to incineration infrastructure within the scope of the Review, unless balanced by an equal or greater closure of capacity, subject to certain limited exceptions. Our response to the Review set out our intentions to set out in National Planning Policy that the Scottish Government does not support the development of further municipal waste incineration capacity in Scotland, with very limited exceptions. Following the adoption and publication of National Planning Framework 4 on 13 February 2023 that action is now complete.
To support future planning decisions, we accepted the review’s separate recommendation to develop an indicative capacity cap. However, it is important that any indicative cap is as robust as possible and developing such a cap will be a significant piece of work.
Where relevant consents and permissions have already been granted, the review noted that it is ‘unlikely that all facilities in the pipeline will be built, especially those that have not yet secured full financial backing’. The Review did suggest some principles, based on stakeholder feedback, that might be applied to determine which of the pipeline facilities would be best to build and which might be deprioritised, in light of the potential overcapacity predicted. These included:
- Proper appreciation of resource and waste management as a complex and interdependent system.
- Application of the proximity principle (that waste should generally be managed as near as possible to its place of production) at a sub-national level.
- Consideration of access to low-carbon transport, especially where longer distances are involved.
- Opportunities for synergy with other activities. For incineration, this should prioritise access to heat offtake and, in due course, carbon dioxide offtake options.
- Local environmental and social impacts.
- Wider environmental impacts, such as the carbon and other benefits from recycling to avoid virgin raw material production.
We would encourage those involved in the development of these facilities to take into account capacity and the principles set out by the independent review of incineration.
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 24 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what commercial benefits it anticipates that financial partners, including Hampden & Co and Lombard Odier Investment Managers, will receive as part of the private finance investment pilot to mobilise £2 billion in landscape scale restoration of native woodland.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-15873 on 24 March 2023. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers .
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 24 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what guidance it has issued to local authorities on future pandemic preparations.
Answer
In Scotland, guidance in relation to preparing for emergencies is generally structured around key consequences or themes, rather than specific risks. The Scottish Government’s suite of emergency planning guidance, “Preparing Scotland” ( https://ready.scot/how-scotland-prepares/preparing-scotland-guidance ), covers topics such as response, exercising, scientific and technical advice, preparedness assessments, public communications, and recovery from emergencies, which are all directly relevant to pandemic preparedness.
This guidance is developed in consultation with the organisations which have legal duties in relation to emergency preparedness under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, which includes all local authorities.
- Asked by: Beatrice Wishart, MSP for Shetland Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 24 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, when it next negotiates NHS board terms and conditions with unions and staff representatives, whether it will take into account the Miscarriage Association's standards regarding pregnancy loss and miscarriage leave, in order to enable NHS boards to sign the Miscarriage Association's Pregnancy Loss Pledge.
Answer
We are fully committed through our employment policies and procedures to support employees who experience pregnancy loss at any stage of pregnancy, and our current package of support measures fully reflect the spirit and intent of the Pregnancy Loss Pledge. The ongoing NHSScotland workforce policies refresh programme offers the opportunity to go further in highlighting provisions and improving guidance for managers. These refreshed policies and supporting documents relating to the Pledge will be published in Autumn 2023.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 24 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of SEPA's position statement that it
“will not take enforcement action against any retailer who does not offer a
takeback service to consumers in Scotland in relation to online or distance
retail sales of scheme articles", whether it can provide any assurance to
retailers that, should they breach the requirement under the Deposit and Return
Scheme for Scotland Regulations 2020 to provide a takeback service, they will
not face enforcement action in the future; whether the Law Officers were
consulted by SEPA on this matter, and what discussions it has had with the
Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service regarding any potential impact of
this development on its approach to pursuing prosecutions in respect of this
matter.
Answer
The Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) is a separately constituted statutory body, independent from the Scottish Ministers, that has primary regulatory responsibility for protecting and improving the environment. Scottish Ministers are not responsible for SEPA’s operational matters, including the exercise of its enforcement functions. It is up to SEPA to consider its enforcement position in relation to this matter.
As a non-Police specialist reporting agency, SEPA has the option to submit reports to the Crown Office Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS). Both SEPA and COPFS are clear that such enforcement action is a last resort, used for the most significant offending. SEPA is an independent regulatory agency and is not required to consult with COPFS or others when taking regulatory positions. This includes the published position concerning online takeback for the Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) which provides reassurance to retailers that no enforcement action will be taken by SEPA with respect to DRS takeback obligations whilst this aspect of the Deposit and Return Scheme for Scotland Regulations 2020 is under review.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 24 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-31530 by Roseanna Cunningham on 14 September 2020, whether it will provide an updated table of capacity figures to 2023, with projections to 2030.
Answer
The following table shows permitted incineration capacity figures held by SEPA to 2023.
The first report of the independent review of the role of incineration in Scotland’s waste hierarchy, made assumptions about capacity beyond 2023, although in doing so, noted that it is unlikely that all facilities in the pipeline (i.e. those not build and at various stages of planning and permitting) will be built. The first report from the independent review is available here: Stop, Sort, Burn, Bury (www.gov.scot)
Year | Total operational waste incineration operational capacity (million tonnes) | Operational biomass incineration capacity (million tonnes) | Operational municipal waste incineration capacity (million tonnes) | Permitted municipal waste incineration capacity (million tonnes) |
2007 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
2008 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
2009 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
2010 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
2011 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
2012 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
2013 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
2014 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
2015 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
2016 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.7 |
2017 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.7 |
2018 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.9 |
2019 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 1 | 1.3 |
2020 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 1 | 1.5 |
2021 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 2.1 |
2022 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 2.2 |
2023 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 2.2 |
- Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 17 April 2023
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 24 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how many court locations managed by the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service are (a) fully, (b) partially and (c) not accessible for disabled people.
Answer
This question relates to operational matters that are the responsibility of the Scottish Court and Tribunals Service (SCTS) corporate body. The question has been passed to the Chief Executive of the SCTS who reply in writing within 20 days.
- Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 17 April 2023
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 24 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to ensure that all court locations managed by the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service are accessible for disabled people.
Answer
This question relates to operational matters that are the responsibility of the Scottish Court and Tribunals Service (SCTS) corporate body. The question has been passed to the Chief Executive of the SCTS who reply in writing within 20 days.
- Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 31 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus Robertson on 24 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether the topic of Scottish independence was discussed in the meeting between the Cabinet Secretary for Constitution, External Affairs and Culture and the UK's Ambassador to Slovenia on 30 August 2022.
Answer
The Ambassador and I met on the sidelines of the Bled Strategic Forum in August last year during which she gave an outline of the Embassy’s work in Slovenia and provided me with an update on the political situation in the country.
The subject of Scottish independence was not an agenda item in discussions. However, Scottish ministers will always be polite enough during international meetings to answer any questions put to them about the Scottish Government's stated policies, including a legal, constitutionally sound referendum, as set out in our Programme for Government.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 24 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-15735 by Lorna Slater on 23 March 2023, whether it will provide the information requested regarding whether or not producers that have registered for the Deposit Return Scheme after 1 March 2023 have been registered in accordance with regulations.
Answer
The Scottish Environment Protection Agency’s (SEPA) Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) producer registration service will only grant registrations that meet the requirements of The Deposit and Return Scheme for Scotland Regulations. All producer registrations granted to date have been registered in accordance with the Regulations. A registration is complete once it has been accepted by SEPA and the producer has been formally notified.