Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…
Chamber and committees

Meeting of the Parliament

Meeting date: Wednesday, June 16, 2010


Contents


Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Question Time


Recruitment



1. To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body how it ensures that open and transparent processes are utilised when hiring staff. (S3O-11095)

The Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body advertises for new staff in a variety of ways, including publishing the selection criteria to be used for the selection process.

John Wilson

I thank the SPCB for that response, but my question is really about the level of vacancies that are advertised only internally. Does the SPCB intend to recruit employees primarily from the internal pool of candidates, rather than from the much larger pool of candidates that would result from advertising positions externally?

Mike Pringle

I thank John Wilson for that supplementary question. Of 338 posts advertised since May 2003, there is an 81 per cent to 19 per cent split in favour of external adverts. When a vacancy in the Scottish Parliament comes up, managers might occasionally decide that there are internal candidates who are specifically suited for the vacancy. In that case, the post is advertised internally and internal candidates can apply. As I said, however, that is unusual, in that 81 per cent of vacancies are advertised outside—somebody in the Parliament could apply for the job as well—and only 19 per cent of vacancies are advertised internally.


Videoconferencing (Committees)



2. To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body how many committee meetings were videoconferenced in the last 12 months. (S3O-11094)

From June 2009 to May 2010 a total of seven committee meetings have used the videoconferencing facilities. In addition, during the same period, the facilities were used on another 10 occasions for other committee business.

David Stewart

Does Mr Johnstone share my disappointment at the low number of full committee meetings that have been videoconferenced? Will he ask the corporate body to encourage committee conveners to make greater use of videoconferencing, both to save costs and as a contribution to carbon reduction targets? Does Mr Johnstone share my view that it is important that the Parliament joins the new revolution in communications technology?

Alex Johnstone

Let me take this opportunity to congratulate the member on his determined pursuit of this matter—it is the third, or perhaps even fourth, time that he has raised it during corporate body questions.

I agree entirely with the member’s position. It is essential that teleconferencing facilities are used more extensively, particularly when there are financial constraints on the Parliament and requirements to cut carbon emissions from travel. I fully agree with the member that it should be the responsibility of the corporate body to encourage greater use of the facilities, and I assure him that we will continue to monitor the requirements in order to provide additional facilities where they are appropriate, and we will take action to encourage greater use.

Nigel Don (North East Scotland) (SNP)

Further to the question and to a question that I have asked the corporate body before, I wonder whether we could discuss the issue of cross-party groups. The last time that I asked whether the videoconferencing facilities were available to cross-party groups, I was told no, because the groups are not primary parliamentary functions. I will not ask the same question again, because I know that I will get the same answer, but, given the small numbers and the fact that the use of the equipment is pretty low, will the corporate body reconsider its policy? A significant number of people in Aberdeen have a professional interest in the cross-party group on obesity, which I convene, and they cannot get here for meetings.

Alex Johnstone

I accept that the member has asked the question before and, sadly, I will give him the same answer, which is that the videoconferencing facilities, like all other SPCB resources, are provided to facilitate and enable parliamentary business. Section 6.4 of the code of conduct for members of the Scottish Parliament lays out the rules for cross-party groups, and rule 13 outlines the limitations on the use of parliamentary facilities. If the member would like to raise the matter and ask for it be discussed more widely, I suggest that he puts it in writing, and it will be given due consideration.


Video and Audio Output (Standards and Licensing)



3. To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body whether it is considering adopting open standards and fair-use licensing in relation to video and audio output from the chamber and committees. (S3O-11096)

Tricia Marwick (Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body)

I shall deal with the question on open standards first. The SPCB is considering adopting open standards. Under our present webcasting contract all chamber business can be downloaded by external users, but it is restricted to the Windows Media file format. The contract is due to be re-let next summer, and we will consider using open standards.

The member also asked about fair-use licensing. In keeping with our commitment to making the Parliament accessible to the people of Scotland and encouraging their participation, all of our video and audio output from the chamber and committees is already free to reuse, subject to our rules of usage.

The SPCB uses the Office of the Queen’s Printer for Scotland online public sector information click-use licence system for anyone who wishes to reuse video and audio output, and the SPCB is currently working with OQPS on developing new licence models for Scottish Parliament copyright material.

Patrick Harvie

I am grateful for the clarification on the question of licensing, as the contents of a debate should be available in text or in audio-video format for the people of Scotland to make use of as they see fit, including to copy freely.

On the question of open formats, after a slightly poor start, the Parliament a few years ago improved its record of trying to ensure that the video output was available to all users on all platforms. Since that time, however, criticism of the Windows Media format has grown around the world, including criticism of some technical as well as some legal aspects. The proliferation of devices that cannot play that output should also force us to question its use. In considering the use of open standards in the future, will the corporate body ensure that the maximum number of people are able to access and freely use the Parliament’s video content in the maximum number of ways? That will mean catering for all devices and continuing to update our processes, rather than thinking that we have got it fixed for all time.

Tricia Marwick

I thank Patrick Harvie for his keen interest in the matter. As I say, the contract is due to be re-let next summer and we will consider using open standards. We will also consider the points that Patrick Harvie has made. Given the fact that the member seems to have a particular expertise and interest in the matter, our officials who are considering the re-letting of the contract will be very pleased to speak to him about the issue.


Staff Salaries



4. To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body how many of its employees earn more than the First Minister’s combined salary. (S3O-11092)

None.

Mary Scanlon

Given the fact that four permanent employees in the core directorate of the Scottish Government have a base salary in excess of the First Minister’s combined salary and the fact that 41 members of staff in the Parliament are paid more than the basic MSP salary, although they do not reach the salary of the First Minister, what form of job evaluation and appraisal is undertaken to ensure value for taxpayers’ money?

Mike Pringle

I am not sure about the first part of that question. I actually said that no SPCB employee earns more than the First Minister’s combined salary.

As the member rightly identifies, 41 senior members of SPCB staff—that is less than 8 per cent of the total number—earn more than an MSP. On the question whether that is good value for money, the pay scales have been adopted by the Parliament and, as people progress up those pay scales through promotion, they will be on that pay. I will look at the question in detail, as there might be something else that I need to get back to the member on.

I suspend the meeting until 2.35, when the next item of business is due to start.

14:28 Meeting suspended.

14:35

On resuming—