There are 5,048 results relating to "Hol tudor v"
|
Date published:
29 June 2022
Hazardous Substances: planning framework - Detailed overview of proposed framework: non-legislative arrangements
Wherever it is considered reasonably possible, administrations agree to seek to inform other administrations of prospective changes in policy one month, or as close to one month as is practical, before making them public.
v. Administrations will ensure an appropriate level of public transparency in decision making that leads to policy changes.
vi.
Date published:
11 March 2020
Defamation and Malicious Publication (Scotland) Bill - Public interest
Public interest
In the Reynolds caseiReynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127 (HL), the House of Lords introduced a defence which protected the publication in the media of untrue defamatory allegations.
Date published:
11 March 2020
Defamation and Malicious Publication (Scotland) Bill - Qualified Privilege
Retrieved from <a href="http://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/files/5114/5820/6101/Discussion_Paper_on_Defamation_DP_No_161.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/files/5114/5820/6101/Discussion_Paper_on_Defamation_DP_No_161.pdf</a> [accessed 30 January 2020]
In the 2013 case of Lyons v Chief Constable of Strathclyde involved communications b...
Date published:
11 March 2020
Defamation and Malicious Publication (Scotland) Bill - Statutory definition of defamation
Instead, it worked on the basis that courts should rely on the existing common law test in the House of Lords case of Sim v Stretch.
The Scottish Government consultation explained that a statutory definition would improve accessibility as the law would be in one place.1Scottish Government. (2019, January).
Date published:
10 January 2019
Informed Consent in Healthcare Settings - 6.2 When can a child provide valid consent?
This provision is based on the English concept of Gillick competence as set out in the case of Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA.ii[1986] AC 112.
Date published:
1 November 2018
Prescription (Scotland) Bill - Stage 3 - About this briefing
Section 5 of the Bill, which addresses a controversial Supreme Court case from 2014 (David T Morrison & Co Limited v ICL Plastics Ltd). This case related to an explosion in a Glasgow plastics factory.
Date published:
1 September 2017
Children and Young People (Information Sharing)(Scotland) Bill - Executive Summary
This follows the Supreme Court decision in Christian Institute v. Lord Advocate [2016] UKSC 51 which found these provisions to be outwith the competence of the Scottish Parliament.
Committees
Date published:
20 April 2017
Stage 1 Report on the Limitation (Childhood Abuse) (Scotland) Bill - Human rights considerations
The Supreme Court said this amounted to an interference with possessions under A1P1.iAXA General Insurance Ltd v Lord Advocate [2011] UKSC 46; Recovery of Medical Costs for Asbestos Diseases (Wales) Bill - Reference by the Counsel General for Wales [2015] UKSC 3.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
15 September 2022
S6W-10400
This demonstrated improvements in the initiation of aspirin therapy within one day (92% in 2021 v. 89% in 2020) and stroke patients receiving brain imaging within 12 hours (89% in 2021 v. 86% in 2020).
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
7 October 2021
S6W-03131
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has conducted a review or evaluation of its performance in fulfilling its non-punishment requirements in international human trafficking law (a) generally and (b) in terms of Scottish public authorities’ responsibilities in light of the decision by the European Court of Human Rights in February 2021 on the case, VCL and AN v UK. The circumstances which led to the case before the European Court of Human Rights preceded the Human Trafficking and Exploitation (Scotland) Act 2015.
