Skip to main content
Loading…

Search

There are 5,048 results relating to "Hol tudor v"

|

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Official Report Meeting date: 24 May 2001

Plenary, 24 May 2001

It has come out—Christine Grahame was right to stress this—that the Scottish criminal justice system is the ladies and gentlemen v the players: inexperienced deputes have to go into solemn sheriff courts and compete against a Scottish bar whose expertise is probably at its highest level, largely as a result of the introduction of the solicitor advocate syst...
Official Report Meeting date: 11 January 2001

Plenary, 11 Jan 2001

The narrowest definition was in the case of Logan v Jessop, where a breach of the peace had to involve a degree of alarm on the part of the individual.
Official Report Meeting date: 19 September 2000

Justice and Home Affairs Committee, 19 Sep 2000

The leading Scottish case is that of Smith of Maddiston Limited v MacNab, which was reported in 1975.
Official Report Meeting date: 9 May 2000

Rural Affairs Committee, 09 May 2000

There are also innovative measures, such as v-notching, to protect various crustaceans.
Official Report Meeting date: 7 November 2005

Edinburgh Tram (Line One) Bill Committee, 07 Nov 2005

Mr Walker, we have heard quite a lot about the Hatton v United Kingdom case this afternoon.
Official Report Meeting date: 22 November 2006

Education Committee, 22 Nov 2006

Our experience of dealing with part V of the Police Act 1997 and with the Protection of Children (Scotland) Act 2003 has been that organisations have considerable weaknesses at all levels in dealing appropriately with their requirements.We agree that organisations will benefit from a reduction in bureaucracy, which the bill will bring about.
Official Report Meeting date: 30 May 2006

Justice 1 Committee, 30 May 2006

I remind members that the case of David Asbury v the Strathclyde joint police board and others is still active and as such is subject to the sub judice rule.
Official Report Meeting date: 1 February 2006

Communities Committee, 01 Feb 2006

It was the same in the County Properties v the Scottish ministers case: the decision was reversed on appeal.
Questions and Answers Date answered: 14 November 2005

S2W-20225

To ask the Scottish Executive how many (a) recorded cases of, (b) prosecutions for and (c) convictions for drug crimes there have been in each of the last five years, broken down into (i) illegal importation of drugs, (ii) illegal cultivation of drugs, (iii) possession of drugs with intent to supply, (iv) possession of drugs, (v) money laundering-related d...
Official Report Meeting date: 16 March 2005

Justice 1 Committee, 16 Mar 2005

Without being overly technical, I should say that section 14 addresses the decision in the case of Wallis v Wallis. The current legal position is that the crucial date for triggering the valuation of matrimonial property is the relevant date, which in most circumstances is the date of separation.Family law practitioners do not completely agree on this matte...

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].