There are 4,978 results relating to "Hol tudok v"
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
5 July 2000
Plenary, 05 Jul 2000
It is not a question of the Executive sticking a finger in the air to gauge whether bail exclusions are a problem; the bail exclusions have already been repealed in England and Wales, for good reason. Following the case of Caballero v UK last year, the UK Government conceded that there was a breach of the ECHR.
Official Report
Meeting date:
29 June 2000
Plenary, 29 Jun 2000
That is why we set up a review group that included Volunteer Development Scotland, the SCVO, YouthLink Scotland—which represents the uniformed bodies—and the Scottish Churches to examine part V of the Police Act 1997. The group was set up to examine the costs of the proposed checks and to consider the administrative burden that would have to be borne by sma...
Official Report
Meeting date:
18 November 1999
Plenary, 18 Nov 1999
With digital television operating effectively across Scotland, we can begin to access a range of different things: not just television programmes, but interactive television programmes. I watched the Scotland v England game on Saturday on interactive television.
Official Report
Meeting date:
30 September 1999
Plenary, 30 Sep 1999
The first major matter relating to the conduct of ministers concerns an invitation to Sam Galbraith as sports minister to attend the Glasgow Rangers v Beitar Jerusalem game on 1 October 1998.
Official Report
Meeting date:
25 May 2006
Plenary, 25 May 2006
Section 3(8) of the bill will amend section 121 of the 1997 act to make it clear that the authority may perform functions under part V of the 1997 act other than those that relate to the making of regulations or orders.
Official Report
Meeting date:
23 June 2005
Plenary, 23 Jun 2005
I think that I am right in saying that part V of the Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 1986 enables SLAB to employ solicitors directly, but the power is not really used in a civil context.
Official Report
Meeting date:
14 January 2004
Justice 1 Committee, 14 Jan 2004
If such a situation transpired, it would be right to have that concern, but in two recent cases in England—R v Jones and R v Singh—convictions were upheld on appeal, which gives us confidence that trial in the absence of the accused can be done.
Official Report
Meeting date:
27 November 2002
Justice 2 Committee, 27 Nov 2002
As the minister made clear, section 43 puts the issues raised in the case of A v UK into Scots law. As we heard in evidence, currently there can be no certainty that cognisance is always taken of A v UK in court decisions.
Official Report
Meeting date:
22 February 2007
Plenary, 22 Feb 2007
Indeed, I can recall only one case—X v Sweeney in 1982—of a private prosecution.
Official Report
Meeting date:
1 February 2007
Plenary, 01 Feb 2007
They volunteered that, after the Barker v Corus case, they had agreed with the Department for Work and Pensions that all claims that followed that judgment but which preceded the passing of the Compensation Act 2006 would be treated under the act.
