There are 5,048 results relating to "Hol tudor v"
|
Date published:
20 November 2019
Resolving parenting disputes: Scotland compared to other countries - The court system
Several court cases heard on appeal (including one before the UK Supreme Court) have also been strongly critical of delays in cases involving children.2NJDB v JEG and other. (2012). Cited as [2012] UKSC 21.
Date published:
10 January 2019
Informed Consent in Healthcare Settings - 4.6 How will the right to information be developed beyond the scope of informed consent?
An important decision is the English case of Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust.i[2018] UKSC 50.
Committees
Date published:
30 May 2018
Annual Report 2017-2018
Annual Report Video 2017-18https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmFuDdkPzpo
Membership changes
The following members left the Committee during this reporting period:
Ross Thomson MSP (8 June 2016 to 12 June 2017)
Colin Beattie MSP (8 June 2016 to 16 November 2017)
Clare Haughey MSP (30 March 2017 to 16 November 2017)
Daniel Johnson MSP (8 June 2016 to 9 January...
Committees
Date published:
5 February 2018
Report of the Education and Skills Committee on Subordinate Legislation Considered on 24 January 2018 - ANNEXE - Letter from Maree Todd MSP, Minister for Childcare and Early Years, 1 February 2018
As you are aware the draft Orders are a response to the recent case P v Scottish Ministers. We believe that the approach set out in the draft Orders balances safeguarding and the rights of the individual.
Last updated:
10 June 2024
$name
In recent years, prior to the decision in Webster v. Dominick, it was used to prosecute what could best be described as ‘public indecency’ and, separately, to prosecute sexual offences against children in certain limited contexts.
Official Report
Meeting date:
29 April 2025
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee 29 April 2025
Item 4 is consideration of evidence on the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and item 5 is consideration of the committee’s approach to scrutiny of the implications of the Supreme Court judgment in the case of For Women Scotland Ltd v the Scottish Ministers. Members indicated agreement.
Last updated:
1 June 2023
Minimum core obligations concepts 31 May 2023
See also BVerfGE 132 where in 2012 the court went beyond the procedural protection in the previous case and recognised a substantive element to an adequate level of subsistence for asylum seekers relying on Article 9 ICESCR. 13 See Trojani Case C-456/02 (an EU case guaranteeing access to minimum social assistance under the free movement of workers). 14 Similarly, the Swiss Federal Court has found that an implied constitutional right to a ‘minimum level of subsistence (‘conditions minimales d’existence’), both for Swiss nationals and foreigners, could be enforced by the Swiss Courts. See Swiss Federal Court, V...
Last updated:
1 February 2023
Post Budget 2023-24 Scrutiny follow up information from Cabinet Secretary 24 January 2023
Sco ttish Min iste r s , sp e cial adv is e r s a nd th e Pe r m a n e n t Se cr e ta ry a r e co v e r e d by th e te r m s of th e Lobby in g (Sco tla nd) Act 2 0 1 6 .
Last updated:
8 June 2022
Bill as introduced
After section 27A (notification of victims in relation to release etc. of short-term (7) prisoners) insert— 18 Bail and Release from Custody (Scotland) Bill Part 3—final provisions “27B 36 Provision of information to person supporting victim (1) This section applies where— (a) a person entitled to receive information under section 27A (“V”) intimates to the Scottish Ministers that a person to whom subsection (2) applies 5 (the “supporter”) is to be given, as well as or instead of V, the information described in section 27A(1) in relation to the person sentenced to imprisonment or detention (“A”), or (b) a supporter intimates to the Scottish Ministers that they wish to be given that information and Ministers are satisfied that the supporter requires 10 the information in order to provide V with support services. 1 (2) This subsection applies to a person— (a) of a description prescribed by the Scottish Ministers by regulations, and (b) who is providing support services to V in relation to the offence perpetrated against V by A. 15 (3) The Scottish Ministers must notify the supporter of the matters mentioned in section 27A(1). (4) Section 27A(2) and (3) apply to notification under subsection (3) as they apply to notification under section 27A(1). (5) In this section, “support services” has the same meaning as in section 16ZA(5) 20 of the 2003 Act. (6) Regulations under subsection (2)(a) may— (a) include incidental, supplementary, consequential, transitional, transitory or saving provision, (b) modify enactments (including this Act). 25 (7) Regulations under subsection (2)(a)— (a) which add to, replace or omit any part of the text of an Act are subject to the affirmative procedure, (b) are otherwise subject to the negative procedure.”.
Last updated:
20 March 2025
UKIMA Cosultation and Review Aileen McHarg
Regulation making powers under ss. 10 and 18 of UKIMA could 2 be used to expand the range of exemptions from the market access principles in 3 Process for considering UK Internal Market Act exclusions in Common Framework areas - GOV.UK. 4 See Scottish Ministers v Advocate General for Scotland [2023] CSOH 89.
