Skip to main content
Loading…

Search

There are 4,701 results relating to "V"

|

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Official Report Meeting date: 18 January 2000

Local Government Committee, 18 Jan 2000

Tables S and T on pages 94 and 95 and tables U and V on pages 99 and 100 of our discussion paper give some figures.Recovery rates at warrant sale stage can be miserable.
Official Report Meeting date: 5 March 2003

Plenary, 05 Mar 2003

When a similar amendment was lodged at stage 2, Linda Fabiani indicated that it was based on concerns arising from a judgment in the English case of Adan v Newham London Borough Council. The judgment in that case raised concerns that an internal review of a homelessness decision might be incompatible with article 6.1 of the ECHR, but it might be helpful to members if I update them on the latest legal position.A later House of Lords decision in the case of Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council departed considerably from the Adan decision.
Official Report Meeting date: 26 February 2003

Plenary, 26 Feb 2003

I gave the minister notice of the case of Smith v MacKintosh, which appears on page 148 of The Scots Law Times of 1989.
Official Report Meeting date: 21 January 2003

Rural Development Committee, 21 Jan 2003

That was established in case law in the case of Alexander v the Royal Hotel (Caithness) Ltd, which found that a tenant farmer has every right to withhold their rent under such circumstances.
Official Report Meeting date: 20 November 2002

Plenary, 20 Nov 2002

The information that someone is on the list will be made known to a prospective child care employer as part of a criminal record check carried out by Disclosure Scotland under part V of the Police Act 1997. There are two main ways in which an individual may be referred to the list: by an employer or through the courts.
Questions and Answers Date answered: 19 January 2005

S2W-10192

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-9744 by Malcolm Chisholm on 12 August 2004, how many out-patients in each NHS board area were waiting for (a) less than nine, (b) less than 13, (c) less than 26 and (d) more than 52 weeks for an NHS appointment, broken down by individual speciality for the quarter to (i) March 1999, (ii) June 1999, (iii) March 2000, (iv) March 2001, (v...
Official Report Meeting date: 31 January 2007

Environment and Rural Development Committee, 31 Jan 2007

One of those species, the ruff, is now the most common in the loch and is thought to pose a major threat to the loch's indigenous powan, which is an internationally renowned species of freshwater fish found in Loch Lomond and Loch Eck. The powan is listed in annex V of the habitats directive, so it is a fish that we want to protect.It is the Executive's str...
Official Report Meeting date: 29 November 2006

Justice 1 Committee, 29 Nov 2006

That gave rise to the Fairchild exception, which meant that there was no need to prove specifically that one person had caused the harm, when a range of employers were potentially responsible. However, the case of Barker v Corus, which followed that, raised the issue of joint and several liability.
Official Report Meeting date: 2 June 2005

Plenary, 02 Jun 2005

On the point about sovereignty, the interesting case of the Lord Advocate v MacCormick established that sovereignty in Scotland lies with the people.
Official Report Meeting date: 19 September 2001

Justice 2 Committee, 19 Sep 2001

Are you asking whether the words constitute a Pepper v Hart statement? Yes, precisely. I do not have the answer to that question.

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].