There are 4,978 results relating to "Hol tudok v"
|
Date published:
31 January 2024
Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Scotland) Bill - Dulgheriu and Orthova v the London Borough of Ealing
Dulgheriu and Orthova v the London Borough of Ealing
Neutral case citation: [2019] EWCA Civ 1490
Ealing Council was the first council in the country to introduce a buffer zone, of 100m, in relation to an abortion clinic in its area.
Committees
Date published:
13 November 2020
COVID-19: impact on businesses, workers and the economy and pre-budget scrutiny - Background
The Scottish Government explained that its recovery phase is focused on developing greater resilience through building and strengthening local supply chains, and social, natural and human capital.iLetter from Scottish Government, 22 May 2020 In May, the Cabinet Secretary described the type of recovery that is anticipated:
At one point, analysis predicted that the recovery would be a sharp V-shaped dip and that demand would then come back.
Last updated:
17 May 2023
SPBill16AS062023
.”, 35 (b) after subsection (7) insert— “(7A) Subsection (7)(b) does not apply where the prisoner fell to be released on or by an excepted day and the release was brought forward to a Thursday by virtue of subsection (7)(a). 7 Bail and Release from Custody (Scotland) Bill Part 2—release from custody (7B) For the purposes of subsections (7) and (7A)— (a) an “excepted day” is a day which is— (i) a Friday, (ii) a Saturday, 5 (iii) a Sunday, (iv) a public holiday, (v...
Official Report
Meeting date:
28 June 2022
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) 28 June 2022
I thank the member for her question and for the opportunity to offer my whole-hearted solidarity to women in the United States following the decision to overturn Roe v Wade and to women elsewhere in the world who do not have access to safe and legal abortion care.
Last updated:
20 March 2025
UKIMA Cosultation and Review Aileen McHarg
Regulation making powers under ss. 10 and 18 of UKIMA could 2 be used to expand the range of exemptions from the market access principles in 3 Process for considering UK Internal Market Act exclusions in Common Framework areas - GOV.UK. 4 See Scottish Ministers v Advocate General for Scotland [2023] CSOH 89.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
13 May 2025
S6W-37074
To ask the Scottish Government what engagement it had with LGBTQ+ groups in relation to the For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers case. No meetings were held with organisations or stakeholders to discuss the case of For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers prior to the Supreme Court judgment as it i...
Last updated:
26 February 2024
Emily Hancox Written Briefing on Retained EU Law
According to the Bill, retained direct EU law must be ‘read and given effect in a way which is compatible’ with domestic law and is ‘subject to all domestic enactments, so far as it is incompatible with 13 EUWA 2018, section 5(5). 14 EUWA 2018, Schedule 1 and Schedule 8, para 39(5). 15 Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Beattie [2022] EAT 163 (“Beattie”) who, instead, correctly at [135] applies the reasoning that I set out above in relation to section 4 of the EU(W)A: 16 Case C-573/17 Popławski II EU:C:2019:53, para 57. 17 Popławski II, para 58. 18 REULRR Bill 2022, clause 4(1). 19 This is known as the doctrine of implied repeal, see Ellen Street Estates v Minister of Health [1934] 1 KB 590, 595-97. 20 them’.
Last updated:
8 February 2024
Emily Hancox
According to the Bill, retained direct EU law must be ‘read and given effect in a way which is compatible’ with domestic law and is ‘subject to all domestic enactments, so far as it is incompatible with 13 EUWA 2018, section 5(5). 14 EUWA 2018, Schedule 1 and Schedule 8, para 39(5). 15 Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Beattie [2022] EAT 163 (“Beattie”) who, instead, correctly at [135] applies the reasoning that I set out above in relation to section 4 of the EU(W)A: 16 Case C-573/17 Popławski II EU:C:2019:53, para 57. 17 Popławski II, para 58. 18 REULRR Bill 2022, clause 4(1). 19 This is known as the doctrine of implied repeal, see Ellen Street Estates v Minister of Health [1934] 1 KB 590, 595-97. 20 them’.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
19 May 2025
S6W-37073
To ask the Scottish Government what engagement it had with women’s rights groups in relation to the For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers case. No meetings were held with organisations or stakeholders to discuss the case of For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers prior to the Supreme Court ju...
Date published:
10 August 2023
Regulation of Legal Services (Scotland) Bill - Hybrid complaints
The SLCC's procedure was challenged in the Court of Session in 2016 with the court finding that the 2007 Act did not give the SLCC the power to categorise complaints as "hybrid complaints" in this way.iAnderson Strathern LLP v Scottish Legal Complaints Commission 2016 SLT 967 The SLCC cannot, therefore, currently consider service elements of a conduct compl...
