There are 4,709 results relating to "V"
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
16 March 2004
Justice 2 Committee, 16 Mar 2004
Paragraph 9 of your submission refers to the case of Burnett's Trustee v Grainger and another. You are critical of the process that arrived at the decision in that case.
Official Report
Meeting date:
28 January 2003
Rural Development Committee, 28 Jan 2003
I will also be interested to hear the minister's view on the matter. I am advised that the Alexander v the Royal Hotel case indicates that the powers already exist.There is another issue that interests me.
Official Report
Meeting date:
18 December 2001
Justice 2 Committee, 18 Dec 2001
An example in the rape context is the recent case of R v Z, in which the accused was being tried for a rape.
Date published:
22 July 2025
Links between Climate Change and Health in Scotland.
., Steensen Nielsen, K., & Araújo Soares, V. (2024). Health psychology and climate change: time to address humanity’s most existential crisis.
Date published:
10 August 2023
Regulation of Legal Services (Scotland) Bill
The SLCC's procedure was challenged in the Court of Session in 2016 with the court finding that the 2007 Act did not give the SLCC the power to categorise complaints as "hybrid complaints" in this way.iAnderson Strathern LLP v Scottish Legal Complaints Commission 2016 SLT 967 The SLCC cannot, therefore, currently consider service elements of a conduct compl...
Date published:
28 May 2020
The UK Environment Bill
., Eckersley, P., Farstad, F., Gravey, V., Jordan, A, Moore, B. and Reid, C, . (2018).
Official Report
Meeting date:
31 May 2006
Justice 1 Committee, 31 May 2006
About 20 years ago, Lord Wheatley set out, in Smith v McCallum, what were clear tests at the time.
Official Report
Meeting date:
23 May 2006
Justice 1 Committee, 23 May 2006
I expect the report that the committee produces at the end of the inquiry to contribute in some way to that process.I remind members that the case of David Asbury v the Strathclyde joint police board and others is still active and as such is subject to the sub judice rule.
Official Report
Meeting date:
9 November 2005
Justice 1 Committee, 09 Nov 2005
Amendment 17—which seeks to deal with the case of Wallis v Wallis, on which you have been working—is about the court's flexibility to use a date other than the relevant date, particularly if the value of the property has increased substantially.
Official Report
Meeting date:
26 January 2005
Justice 1 Committee, 26 Jan 2005
I refer in particular to the case of Webster v Dominick. We have been asked to note that there was a guilty plea in the case, so the relevancy of the charge was not tested.
