There are 4,318 results relating to "V"
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
29 November 2006
Justice 1 Committee, 29 Nov 2006
That gave rise to the Fairchild exception, which meant that there was no need to prove specifically that one person had caused the harm, when a range of employers were potentially responsible. However, the case of Barker v Corus, which followed that, raised the issue of joint and several liability.
Official Report
Meeting date:
2 June 2005
Plenary, 02 Jun 2005
On the point about sovereignty, the interesting case of the Lord Advocate v MacCormick established that sovereignty in Scotland lies with the people.
Official Report
Meeting date:
19 September 2001
Justice 2 Committee, 19 Sep 2001
Are you asking whether the words constitute a Pepper v Hart statement? Yes, precisely. I do not have the answer to that question.
Official Report
Meeting date:
5 April 2001
Plenary, 05 Apr 2001
It is not just a matter of salt 'n sauce v salt 'n vinegar on chips. We need to ensure that we bring Scotland together.
Official Report
Meeting date:
26 September 2001
Justice 2 Committee, 26 Sep 2001
Recently, there was a case in the House of Lords—Regina v A—in which the question of whether previous sexual history could ever be relevant in such a trial was discussed.We all agree that the fact that someone has consented to a previous sexual act is not relevant to whether they consented to the act that is the subject of the charge.
Official Report
Meeting date:
3 May 2006
Environment and Rural Development Committee, 03 May 2006
Your submission cites the 2005 case of Davidson v Scottish ministers. It looks as if such a case has already gone all the way.
Official Report
Meeting date:
13 January 2004
Justice 2 Committee, 13 Jan 2004
The issue of what constitutes breach of the peace was recently examined in the case of Smith v Donnelly, which is noted in the 2001 Scottish Criminal Case Reports at page 800.
Official Report
Meeting date:
27 September 2005
Justice 2 Committee, 27 Sep 2005
However, there was a change of Government; the incoming Labour Government repealed the 1997 act in part V of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and since then we have continued with automatic early release.
Official Report
Meeting date:
18 May 2004
Plenary, 18 May 2004
In the Rangers programme from the Rangers v Motherwell match, there was a postage-stamp-sized corner of page 3 with a lovely bit of rhetoric about how Rangers want to stamp out sectarianism in football.
Official Report
Meeting date:
27 April 2004
Justice 2 Committee, 27 Apr 2004
The notable case that we were presented with was Hooper v Royal London General Insurance, in which somebody had a previously undisclosed conviction as an arsonist.
