There are 4,322 results relating to "V"
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
30 May 2001
Plenary, 30 May 2001
The purpose of amendment 1 is to preserve the effect of the decision in the case of O'Neill v Her Majesty's Advocate, which, for the cognoscenti and the interested, is reported in The Scots Law Times 1999, at page 958.
Official Report
Meeting date:
7 October 2003
Procedures Committee, 07 Oct 2003
In that case, how can we get to stage (v), which deals with questions that have exactly the same random number?
Official Report
Meeting date:
27 March 2002
Justice 2 Committee, 27 Mar 2002
If we fictionalised this, no one would believe it. I am thinking of Jarndyce v Jarndyce—the single case of legal obfuscation—in Charles Dickens's famous book.
Official Report
Meeting date:
28 March 2007
Justice 1 Committee, 28 Mar 2007
To introduce the changes to the benefit of the faculty, the regulations are intended to have retrospective effect.The committee may recall mention of the case of Shelagh McCall v the Scottish ministers, in which it was held that it was ultra vires to make regulations that applied retrospectively when their application caused unfair detriment to people whom ...
Official Report
Meeting date:
20 September 2005
Audit Committee, 20 Sep 2005
This 2004-05 section 22 report updates the position and details some recent developments.By way of background, I point out that, in April 2004, Lord Bonomy issued his judgment in the case of Robert Napier v the Scottish ministers. The judgment, which was upheld on appeal, described the triple vices of prison conditions: slopping out, overcrowding and poor r...
Official Report
Meeting date:
13 September 2005
Subordinate Legislation Committee, 13 Sep 2005
Indeed, one of the legal judgments quoted in the Executive letter is"Camden London Borough Council v ADC Estates Limited".It is a general ruling about the range of Government communication with the public at large.
Official Report
Meeting date:
10 September 2003
Environment and Rural Development Committee, 10 Sep 2003
It contains requirements to group house sows and gilts, minimum space requirements and a minimum continuous solid lying area—existing buildings have until 1 January 2013 to comply with those specifications. Part V deals with piglets and changes the minimum weaning age, with the exception of all-in, all-out systems.
Official Report
Meeting date:
28 January 2003
Public Petitions Committee, 28 Jan 2003
The people with whom I graduated included Brian Wilson, MP; Jim Innes, of the West Highland Free Press; Richard S Tur, the youngest professor of law at university for many years; Professor David Petrie, who won a landmark case in the EU and who was my flatmate; and Tom Crooks, who challenged the UK legal system in a case that is frequently cited in Hansard as Crooks v the legal system—a touch ironically, as he beat the system hands down.
Official Report
Meeting date:
22 May 2000
Justice and Home Affairs Committee, 22 May 2000
One example is Lord Wheatley's decisions in Smith v M 1982. Guidelines for the court in allowing or refusing bail were set out clearly.
Official Report
Meeting date:
27 June 2000
Justice and Home Affairs Committee, 27 Jun 2000
The European Court has made it clear in two cases—Caballero v United Kingdom and TW v Malta—that article 5.3 requires access to a judicial authority who would review the lawfulness of detention promptly and automatically and who would have the power to grant release if appropriate.
