There are 5,042 results relating to "Hol tudor v"
|
Date published:
27 June 2022
Judicial Review - Procedural protection or protecting the substance of the expectation?
A legitimate expectation may entitle people to a level of procedural protection (such as an oral hearing) which, in the absence of the expectation, they would not have received.1R v Liverpool Corp Ex p Liverpool Taxi Fleet Operators' Association [1972] 2 QB 299. (1972).2Attorney General of Hong Kong v Yuen [1983] 2 A...
Last updated:
25 January 2022
Agenda for the CPG on Deafness meeting of 20 April 2022
Agenda (Draft) Agenda item 1 Welcome and Introductions (v) 6.00 Agenda item 2 2a.) Attendance and Apologies (p)(v) 6.05 2b.)
Last updated:
17 April 2023
20230221_CalMacFerries_response
Table 5 – Cancelled Sailings by Cause Disruption Cause Name FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 Action of blue light services* 6 5 7 Adverse weather 6,311 4,550 5,113 All others 5 7 43 Bereavement issues* 2 Berth not free (cal mac)* 2 Berth not free (external) * 28 Bunkering issues 2 10 Bunkering issues* 2 Drills on passage* 2 Force majeure event* 135 1,194 2,053 Livestock sailing 5 Mechanical problems (ship)* 1,064 498 1,678 Mechanical problems (shore)* 109 18 25 Medical emergency* 6 8 1 Navigational issues 7 3 10 No call required 18 35 12 Pier work (external)* 220 44 16 Scot government approved 120 485 1,551 Ship involved in emergency* 7 6 14 Sub vessel (other reason)* 3 2 2 Substitute vessel (ann o/haul) 5 Very high tide 15 171 81 Very low tide 207 81 167 Vessel changeover 1 4 Vessel redeployed* 91 Total 8,347 7,115 10,825 Causes marked * are considered to be within CalMac’s control A ppendix 1 – Causes of Cancelled Services by Route (FY 2021/22) Route Name ) * * ) L S E U * E * ) R D * * A Y C ) P I ) E I O H C / N L V...
Date published:
7 July 2025
Child abduction - Where both parents have PRRs
A solicitor should be consulted in this regard.
Orr v K (2003)2Orr v K 2003 SLT (Sh Ct) 70 . (2003).
Date published:
5 October 2023
Trees, forests and hedges - some frequently asked questions - Statutory nuisance
Instead a statutory nuisance has to affect someone's personal comfort in a material way.iiWivenhoe Port Ltd v Colchester Borough Council 1985 [1985] 1 WLUK 708 Guidance on statutory nuisance from the Scottish Government states that:
3.9 There are three significant differences between common law nuisance and statutory nuisance:-
a) for a statutory nuisance to occur there must be a common law nuisance; however not all common law nuisances would amount to a statutory nuisance ( NCB v Thorne 1976).
b) the statutory nuisance regime, unlike common law nuisance does not deal with harm to property; a statutory nuisance must interfere with personal comfort in a manner that affects their wellbeing for example dust affecting cars would not be nuisance but the same dust in a person's eyes or hair would interfere with personal comfort even if there were no adverse health impact (Wivenhoe Port Ltd v Colchester Borough Council 1985).
c) there is no requirement for a person to have any property rights as for a common law private nuisance - a statutory nuisance protects people not property (Hunter v canary Wharf Ltd 1997).
Last updated:
17 January 2023
Petition PE1758 GREY 2K USA Worldwide letter 16 January 2023
Are you... Male Female Non-binary N %> %V Sig N %> %V Sig N %> %V Sig Total 491 48% 100% 528 52% 100% 1 0% 100% Q1.
Date published:
1 September 2017
Children and Young People (Information Sharing)(Scotland) Bill - Supreme Court ruling
Supreme Court ruling
The named person provisions in part 4 of the 2014 Act were challenged in the courts. In the Christian Institute v. Lord Advocate [2016] UKSC 51,1The Christian Institute and others (Appellants) v The Lord Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland) [2016] UKSC 51. (2016).
Last updated:
29 September 2022
CPG Deafness agenda 1 November 22
pwd=YVg2U1NTVmpnN0ZIQj JzSWhYTzU2UT09 Meeting ID: 825 9660 4000 Passcode: 824940 Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/klG9I7NBh AGM Agenda (Draft) Agenda item 1 Welcome and Introductions (v) 6.00 Agenda item 2 Convenor’s Report (v) 6.05 Agenda item 3 Election of Officer Bearers (v) 6.10 Convenor Vice Convenor Secretariat Date of next AGM to be confirmed-Sept 2023 Agenda item 4 Close to move to start Ordinary meeting (v) 6.15 For your information: (v) – verbal report / information (p) – papers sent out before BSL / English Interpreters and Electronic Notetakers will be provided.
Date published:
10 January 2019
Informed Consent in Healthcare Settings - 2.2 Montgomery in the Scottish courts
The 1985 case of SidawayiiiSidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital [1985] AC 871.
Date published:
7 July 2025
Child abduction - The requirement to overcome a child's will
For example, in an abduction case from 1980,2HMA v Mclean (May 1980, unreported) Glasgow High Court. (1980). the court said that evidence of leading or inducing the child away would in itself be sufficient to establish that the child was taken away against their will.2HMA v Mclean (May 1980, unreported) Glasgow High ...
