Skip to main content
Loading…

Search

There are 4,972 results relating to "Hol tudok v"

|
You may wish to search for the following phrase:

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Last updated: 4 July 2023

WMMB follow up from meeting on 31 May Bill team

Yours Sincerely Hugh Dignon Head of Wildlife Management Unit – Scottish Government Vict o ria Qu a y , Ed inb u r gh EH6 αβχδεφγηιϕ a b c d abcdefg α 6QQ w w w .go v .s co t pdf. application/pdf. 225475.
Last updated: 28 April 2025

For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers from Sex Matters 28 April 2025

Sex Matters is a charitable incorporated organisation, charity number 1207701 Registered office: 63/66 Hatton Garden, Fifth Floor Suite 23, London, EC1N 8LE pdf. application/pdf. 352228. For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers from Sex Matters 28 April 2025.
Last updated: 19 September 2025

Cybercrime SCVO Response 17 September 2025

Thro ug h this we ca n see that the majo rity o f vo luntary o rg anisatio ns in Sco tland see cyb er sec urity as a business prio rity ho weve r ve ry few have a cyber incident response plan and/o r adequate staff/v o luntee r cyb er training in place .
Date published: 22 November 2019

Human Rights and the Environment - Case Studies: Influence of Constitutional Environmental Rights

Despite this, the District Court ruled that the Government's decision to extend licenses for oil exploration and drilling did not contravene the right to a healthy environment.6London School of Economics and Political Science. (n.d.) Greenpeace Norway v. Government of Norway. Retrieved from <a href="http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/litigation/greenpeace-norway-v-government-of-norway/" target="_blank">http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/litigation/greenpeace-norway-v-government-of-norway/</a> [accessed 17 November 2019] The case began appeal proceedings at the Oslo Court of Appeal on 5 November 2019.
Committees Date published: 9 March 2021

Standing Order Rule changes - Private and Hybrid Bill Procedures - Annexe A: Standing Order rule changes

In Rule 9A.4.2, for: "such premises as the Presiding Officer may determine" substitute: "the premises listed in the Promoter's Statement by virtue of Rule 9A.2.3(d)(v)". [This Rule-change is consequential on the previous one, reflecting the fact that revised Rule 9A.2.3(d)(v) now provides for the Presiding Officer's ...
Last updated: 3 June 2025

PE2109_F

Significant sums have already been invested in developing proposals, Environmental iv v vi vii viii Impact Assessments, community outreach and more .
Date published: 17 December 2024

The law applying at the end of adult relationships - Unjustified enrichment

Retrieved from https://brodies.com/insights/alternative-dispute-resolution/unjustified-enrichment-alternative-remedies-and-prescription/ Pert v McCaffrey (2020)2Pert v McCaffrey [2020] CSIH 5; 2020 SC 259; 2020 SLT 225. (2020).
Date published: 26 November 2024

Adults with incapacity - 2024 update - The Bournewood case (2004) and Cheshire West case (2014)

Mental Welfare Commission response to queries related to when to use s13ZA v Guardianship following the Cheshire West Supreme Court decision.
Date published: 31 January 2024

Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Scotland) Bill - Article 8: the right to respect for private and family life

However, states have wide discretion as to how they choose to balance the competing interests in this area (A, B and C v Ireland (App. No. 25579/05, ECtHR 16 Dec 2010)).
Date published: 27 June 2022

Judicial Review - Acts of the Scottish Parliament and the 'traditional' grounds of review

Aside from this specific statutory form of illegality, the 2011 UK Supreme Court decision in the AXA case clarified that the traditional grounds of illegality and unreasonableness did not apply to Acts of the Scottish Parliament, save in exceptional circumstances.1 AXA General Insurance Ltd v Lord Advocate, AXA General Insurance Ltd v HM Advocate. (2011). [2011] UKSC 46 [2012] 1 A.C. 868; [2011] 3 W.L.R. 871; 2012 S.C.

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].