There are 5,042 results relating to "Hol tudor v"
|
Last updated:
10 June 2024
$name
The inclusion of section 4(4) in the Bill, which provides that an appointing person may over-ride the requirement to give preference to a woman in the circumstances described in sections 3 and 4 of the Bill, is required by the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice which provides that such a requirement cannot be absolute (see Case C-450/93 Kalanke v Freie Hansestadt Bremen [1995] ECR I-3051; Case C-409/95 Marschall v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen [1997] ECR I-6363; Case C-158/97 Badeck [2000] ECR I-1875; Case C-407/98 Abrahamsson v Fogelqvist [2000] ECR I-5539; Case C-476/99 Lommers v Minister van Landbouw Natuurbeheer en Visserij [2002] ECR I-2891; Briheche v Ministri de l’Interieur, Case C-319/03, [2004] ECR I-8807; Griesmar v Ministre de l’Economie, Case C-366/99, [2001] ECR I-9383).
Official Report
Meeting date:
3 December 2024
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee 03 December 2024
In correspondence with the Scottish Government, which is published alongside the papers for this meeting, the committee queried whether regulation 3(2)(a)(v) is sufficiently clear to the reader.
Last updated:
25 May 2021
FamilyTrail
J L E Q T T A A S L U E B V V L G J P I G C A L O A A Q T A D T T B T N E B X M J I E K E D L Y F E T O N O Q Y I I O N A N M P G R C C X T SCOTLAND LAWS VOTE MSP PARLIAMENT DEBATE ELECTION GAELIC See if you can find some of the words you have come across.
Last updated:
15 May 2025
G Davies and H Farrand Carrapico Supplementary Evidence
In the case of Minister for Justice v Keating [2024] IEHC 515 the court heard arguments relating to overcrowding in UK prisons.
Committees
Date published:
4 December 2024
Subordinate Legislation Considered by the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee on 3 December 2024 - Scrutiny of instruments under the Committee's remit: instrument drawn to the attention of the Parliament
In correspondence with the Scottish Government, the Committee queried whether the wording of regulation 3(2)(a)(v) is sufficiently clear to the reader of the instrument.
Last updated:
12 October 2021
AnnexeTableLetter from Mr Arthur to Local Government and Communities Committee UK SI ENV 022 4
Se e w w w .lobby in g.s co t St And r e w ’s Ho u s e , Re ge n t Ro ad , Ed inb u rgh EH1 3 DG w w w .go v .s co t a b c de abcdefg α
pdf.
application/pdf.
139059.
Date published:
26 June 2024
Nuisance complaints - some frequently asked questions - Common law nuisance
[accessed 12 January 2024] Fault (culpa) also needs to be proved, which includes deliberate acts, negligence or other relevant conduct.iKennedy v Glenbelle 1996 SC 95
An example of a recent court case is the 2020 case of McBean v Scottish Waterii[2020] CSOH 55 which related to odours from a waste water treatment plan...
Date published:
15 December 2022
Property Factors - Frequently Asked Questions - Cases in the courts
LANDS TRIBUNAL FOR SCOTLAND OPINION Michael Joseph Marriott and another (applicants) v Greenbelt Group Limited (respondents) Case Ref: LTS/TC/2014/27.
Date published:
27 June 2022
Judicial Review - Standing in judicial review cases: the general position
The previous law on standing in Scotland was widely criticised and was changed by the UK Supreme Court in 2011 in what is known as the AXA case.1 AXA General Insurance Ltd v Lord Advocate, AXA General Insurance Ltd v HM Advocate. (2011). [2011] UKSC 46 [2012] 1 A.C. 868; [2011] 3 W.L.R. 871; 2012 S.C.
Committees
Date published:
30 May 2025
Annual Report of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee for 2024-25 - Operation of the Public Sector Equality Duty
Having concluded evidence taking, the Committee agreed to delay consideration of a report until it had reflected on the implications of the judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v the Scottish Ministers (Respondent).
