There are 4,972 results relating to "Hol tudok v"
|
Last updated:
19 August 2022
minutes CPG on Medicinal Cannabis 15 september 22
Anticipated Topics ✓ Access to Bedrolite, other cannabis-based drugs, high costs ✓ Red Card (Colorado), MedCan Card for Medical Cannabis ✓ Patient Rights (human rights) v Public Health ✓ NHS v Private Treatments ✓ Medical Benefits – risks, side effects ✓ Reducing Stigma – evidence based to unlock institutional (e.g.
Last updated:
27 February 2024
Post Cttee Apperance Culture Counts
The following innovative fundraising examples from V&A Dundee may have wider learning that can be applied elsewhere.
Date published:
10 January 2019
Informed Consent in Healthcare Settings - 1.2 When is consent valid?
An absence of consent or lawful authority can infringe the patient's autonomy and violate their bodily integrity.iiBreaching Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Glass v United Kingdom [2004] 1 FLR 1019, ECtHR.
Committees
Date published:
14 June 2018
Prescription (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1 Report - The impact of the David T Morrison v ICL Plasticscase
The impact of the David T Morrison v ICL Plastics case
Prior to the Morrison case, it was thought that section 11(3) of the 1973 Act meant that the five year prescription period was postponed until the pursuer knew that:
he or she had suffered loss, injury or damage; and
that loss injury or damage had been caused by fault or negligence.
Last updated:
10 June 2024
$name
The inclusion of section 4(4) in the Bill, which provides that an appointing person may over-ride the requirement to give preference to a woman in the circumstances described in sections 3 and 4 of the Bill, is required by the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice which provides that such a requirement cannot be absolute (see Case C-450/93 Kalanke v Freie Hansestadt Bremen [1995] ECR I-3051; Case C-409/95 Marschall v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen [1997] ECR I-6363; Case C-158/97 Badeck [2000] ECR I-1875; Case C-407/98 Abrahamsson v Fogelqvist [2000] ECR I-5539; Case C-476/99 Lommers v Minister van Landbouw Natuurbeheer en Visserij [2002] ECR I-2891; Briheche v Ministri de l’Interieur, Case C-319/03, [2004] ECR I-8807; Griesmar v Ministre de l’Economie, Case C-366/99, [2001] ECR I-9383).
Official Report
Meeting date:
3 December 2024
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee 03 December 2024
In correspondence with the Scottish Government, which is published alongside the papers for this meeting, the committee queried whether regulation 3(2)(a)(v) is sufficiently clear to the reader.
Last updated:
25 May 2021
FamilyTrail
J L E Q T T A A S L U E B V V L G J P I G C A L O A A Q T A D T T B T N E B X M J I E K E D L Y F E T O N O Q Y I I O N A N M P G R C C X T SCOTLAND LAWS VOTE MSP PARLIAMENT DEBATE ELECTION GAELIC See if you can find some of the words you have come across.
Last updated:
15 May 2025
G Davies and H Farrand Carrapico Supplementary Evidence
In the case of Minister for Justice v Keating [2024] IEHC 515 the court heard arguments relating to overcrowding in UK prisons.
Committees
Date published:
4 December 2024
Subordinate Legislation Considered by the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee on 3 December 2024 - Scrutiny of instruments under the Committee's remit: instrument drawn to the attention of the Parliament
In correspondence with the Scottish Government, the Committee queried whether the wording of regulation 3(2)(a)(v) is sufficiently clear to the reader of the instrument.
Last updated:
12 October 2021
AnnexeTableLetter from Mr Arthur to Local Government and Communities Committee UK SI ENV 022 4
Se e w w w .lobby in g.s co t St And r e w ’s Ho u s e , Re ge n t Ro ad , Ed inb u rgh EH1 3 DG w w w .go v .s co t a b c de abcdefg α
pdf.
application/pdf.
139059.
