There are 5,043 results relating to "Hol tudor v"
|
Last updated:
20 June 2025
PE2102_I
This, of course, meant that the accused was subject to the notification requirements of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. 2 The High Court also examined the issue in the case of Rae v HMA , where a sentence of imprisonment for the offence of rape of a young child was being appealed by the offender.
Last updated:
25 May 2023
FMPG Cab Sec to PAC 24 May 2023
Se e w w w .lobby in g.s co t St And r e w ’s Ho u s e , Re ge n t Ro ad , Ed inb u rgh EH1 3 DG w w w .go v .s co t a b c d abcdefg α
pdf.
application/pdf.
126721.
Last updated:
20 April 2023
PE1975_N
Further reform is needed. 3 Henderson v. 3052775 Nova Scotia Limited (Scotland) [2006] UKHL 21. 4 McKays Stores Ltd v City Wall (Holdings) Ltd 1989 S.L.T 835. 5 Arthur J Gallagher Insurance Brokers Limited and ors v.
Last updated:
6 March 2023
PE1996_B
Thus, 1(1)(d) is only present because a clear discriminatory attitude is seen as acceptable 1 Paragraph 7, Summary: Crowter and Others v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2022] EWCA Civ 1559, https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Crowter-v-SSHSC-summary.pdf 2 Paragraph 72: Crowter and Others v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2022] EWCA Civ 1559, https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Crowter-v-SSHSC-judgment.pdf 3 British Pregnancy Advisory Service, Britain's abortion law, https://www.bpas.org/get- involved/campaigns/briefings/abortion-law/ (Accessed on the 24 January 2023) which contradicts the UK Equality Act 2010, which is not mentioned in the Court of Appeal judgment, and which protects individuals with certain characteristics, such as disability, sex, race, or sexual orientation, from discrimination.
Last updated:
6 December 2022
Major ICT Projects Director Digital to PAC 2 December 2022
Vict o ria Qu a y , Ed inb u r gh EH6 6QQ w w w .go v .s co t γηιϕ a b c d abcdefg α
pdf.
application/pdf.
175229.
Last updated:
23 August 2022
Letter from the Deputy First Minister to the Convener CEEAC Committee Interministerial Standing Co
Se e w w w .lobby in g.s co t St And r e w ’s Ho u s e , Re ge n t Ro ad , Ed inb u rgh EH1 3 DG a b c de abcdefg a w w w .go v .s co t
pdf.
application/pdf.
135998.
Committees
Published:
30 April 2025
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent): Maggie Chapman MSP
Read the correspondence.
For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers to Faculty of Advocates 30 April 2025.
Committees
Published:
28 April 2025
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent)
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent).
Committees
Published:
25 April 2025
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent)
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent).
Committees
Published:
24 April 2025
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent)
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent).
