- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 September 2012
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 11 September 2012
To ask the Scottish Government how much each territorial and special NHS board has spent on legal fees in relation to compromise agreements and how many such agreements each board has reached.
Answer
This is a matter for NHS boards. The information sought is not held centrally by the Scottish Government.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 29 August 2012
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 11 September 2012
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason the benchmarking audit of pain services, which was due to be published in June 2012, has been delayed.
Answer
The change of publishing date is due to additional factual accuracy checks being undertaken. This is important to ensure the report is accurate and can be used to inform planning.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 29 August 2012
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 11 September 2012
To ask the Scottish Government when the benchmarking audit of pain services (a) was carried out and (b) will be published.
Answer
Dr. Gilbert, our National Lead Clinician for Chronic Pain and the project management team in Healthcare Improvement Scotland conducted an audit of Pain Management Services and the numbers of patients seen by these services for the period 1 April 2010 to March 2011. It is anticipated that the report will be published by Healthcare Improvement Scotland by the end of September 2012.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 29 August 2012
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 5 September 2012
To ask the Scottish Government what funding it has allocated to West Dunbartonshire Council from its youth unemployment fund.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 5 September 2012
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 June 2012
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 11 July 2012
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will provide thalidomide survivors with a permanent financial contribution of at least the same annual rate as in the pilot health grant scheme for the rest of their lives.
Answer
Officials from the four administrations are currently jointly discussing future funding options with the Thalidomide Trust and National Advisory Council. A meeting between officials and the Trust is scheduled for 17 July.
We also await the evaluation of the second year of the grant before coming to a final decision.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 June 2012
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 11 July 2012
To ask the Scottish Executive what impact the peer support scheme has had on the number of individual patient treatment requests.
Answer
This information is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 June 2012
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 11 July 2012
To ask the Scottish Executive which NHS boards have established individual patient treatment request registers.
Answer
The guidance to further strengthen the safe and effective use of new medicines across the NHS in Scotland published under cover of SGHD/CMO(2012)1 on 13 February 2012 asked NHS boards to confirm that their policies on formularies and management of individual patient treatment request registers (IPTRs) had been updated to reflect the additional guidance which included the need to maintain accurate and up to date information on IPTRs and the outcomes, including the outcome of any appeals.
All NHS boards have provided this confirmation as appropriate.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 June 2012
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 11 July 2012
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there is evidence that the peer support system for individual patient treatment requests has led to clinicians providing each other with increased support.
Answer
This information is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 13 June 2012
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 2 July 2012
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S4W-07374 by Nicola Sturgeon on 6 June 2012, whether the Cabinet Secretary for Health, Wellbeing and Cities Strategy has questioned the quarterly statistics reports published by ISD on waiting times (a) ever and (b) on the increase in the number of patients who are socially unavailable.
Answer
As part of the normal quarterly reporting of the ISD waiting times statistics by my officials, I have sought further explanations on various aspects of ISD waiting times statistics, particularly around NHS boards’ individual performance against the waiting time standards and other issues.
Following the Price Waterhouse Cooper’s report on NHS Lothian management of waiting times, I now routinely receive more detailed information on social unavailability by individual NHS boards.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 13 June 2012
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 27 June 2012
To ask the Scottish Executive what contingency plans are in place in relation to the planned industrial action by the British Medical Association on 21 June 2012.
Answer
All NHS boards have robust business continuity plans in place to deal with disruptions such as those caused by industrial action and to ensure that core services are maintained. NHS boards worked closely with the BMA local representatives to assess the impact of the industrial action.
NHS boards worked locally with doctors to agree the level of services that would be provided on the day and to avoid unnecessary disruption to patients. Urgent and emergency care was not affected. Health boards confirmed that all patients whose appointments had been cancelled and rescheduled were informed by letter or telephone. GP practices were responsible for informing their patients of the level of services they would provide on 21 June. Doctors were available to ensure that urgent and emergency care was not affected, this includes cancer treatment and other on-going treatment.