Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

  • Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
  • Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search.  There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 4 July 2025
Answer status
Question type

Displaying 273 questions Show Answers

|

Question reference: S5W-18640

  • Asked by: Tom Mason, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 06 September 2018
  • Current Status: Answered by Jeane Freeman on 11 October 2018

To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-17602 by Jeanne Freeman on 20 July 2018, what the funding is for each NHS board in  2018-19, also broken down by additional funding that has been (a) announced and (b) allocated since the Budget was agreed.

Question reference: S5W-18635

  • Asked by: Tom Mason, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 06 September 2018
  • Current Status: Answered by Jeane Freeman on 8 October 2018

To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-17602 by Jeane Freeman on 20 July 2018, whether it will provide a breakdown of the levels of funding allocated to reducing each key performance target area’s waiting times.

Question reference: S5W-18752

  • Asked by: Tom Mason, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 21 September 2018
  • Current Status: Answered by Kate Forbes on 5 October 2018

To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-17540 by Derek Mackay on 17 July 2018, whether it will provide the information that was requested regarding on what basis it claims in Scotland's Fiscal Outlook, The Scottish Government's Five Year Financial Strategy that Scotland has the "most attractive business rates package in the UK", and what its position is on this statement in light of the Large Business Supplement being double that in England.

Question reference: S5W-18751

  • Asked by: Tom Mason, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 21 September 2018
  • Current Status: Answered by Kate Forbes on 5 October 2018

To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-17540 by Derek Mackay on 17 July 2018, whether any independent institution has verified the claim in Scotland’s Fiscal Outlook: The Scottish Government’s Five Year Strategy that Scotland has the "most attractive business rates package in the UK".

Question reference: S5W-18746

  • Asked by: Tom Mason, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 21 September 2018
  • Current Status: Answered by Kate Forbes on 5 October 2018

To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-17540 by Derek Mackay on 17 July 2018, how many businesses have welcomed the Large Business Supplement being twice that in England.

Question reference: S5W-18960

  • Asked by: Tom Mason, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 21 September 2018
  • Current Status: Answered by Jeane Freeman on 4 October 2018

To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether the distance between the NHS Grampian area and the central belt is an acceptable distance for babies born prematurely to travel for neonatal intensive care.

Question reference: S5W-18749

  • Asked by: Tom Mason, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 21 September 2018
  • Current Status: Answered by Ben Macpherson on 4 October 2018

To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to increase population growth, other than through migration.

Question reference: S5W-18957

  • Asked by: Tom Mason, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 21 September 2018
  • Current Status: Answered by Jeane Freeman on 2 October 2018

To ask the Scottish Government, in light of National Records of Scotland figures stating that NHS Grampian serves an estimated 600,000 people, what its position is on the importance of there being a neonatal intensive care unit that is readily accessible in the local area.

Question reference: S5W-18748

  • Asked by: Tom Mason, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 21 September 2018
  • Current Status: Answered by Derek Mackay on 2 October 2018

To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-17419 by Derek Mackay on 16 July 2018, what its position is on whether its policy to increase income tax levels for people earning over £26,000 compared with people in the rest of the UK, holding other factors constant, will widen or narrow the gap between Scotland's and the UK’s levels of real household disposable income.

Question reference: S5W-18958

  • Asked by: Tom Mason, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 21 September 2018
  • Current Status: Answered by Jeane Freeman on 2 October 2018

To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on the recommendation in the report, The Best Start: A Five-Year Forward Plan for Maternity and Neonatal Care in Scotland, which was published in January 2017, to reduce the number of neonatal intensive care units from eight to three.