Chamber and committees

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search. There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Filter your results Hide all filters

Displaying 1854 questions Show Answers

Order by |

Question reference: S5W-12444

Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Friday, 03 November 2017
Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 14 November 2017

To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on proposals set out by Western Isles Intergrated Joint Board to close dental surgeries in Lochmaddy and Liniclate and have a single dental service operating from Uist and Barra Hospital.

The Integration Joint Board (IJB) is responsible for strategic planning of local service provision, including health care services. It would therefore not be appropriate for the Scottish Government to comment on the precise nature of these proposals.

We understand that the Western Isles IJB plans to hold a series of public meetings which will allow those affected communities a further opportunity to engage in future service design.

IJBs are bound by the Public Bodies (Joint Working) (Scotland) Act 2014, which requires Integration Authorities to engage and consult with a range of stakeholders, working with local communities to improve outcomes and sustainability through service redesign.

Question reference: S5W-12431

Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Friday, 03 November 2017
Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 14 November 2017

To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the publication of the Audit Scotland report, NHS in Scotland 2017, for what reason NHS Highland remains 1.5% below its target funding allocation.

As recognised in the Audit Scotland Report, NHS in Scotland 2017, all Boards are currently within 1% of their target funding allocations.

In 2017-18 NHS Highland’s resource budget has increased by 1.6% to
£586.9 million. This includes an additional £0.8 million of NRAC parity funding, which takes the Board to within 1% of its target funding allocation. Since 2015-16 NHS Highland has received additional funding of £13.3 million for the specific purpose of accelerating funding parity in line with the NRAC formula.

Question reference: S5W-12272

Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Monday, 30 October 2017
Current Status: Answered by Humza Yousaf on 9 November 2017

To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the finding in the Audit Scotland report, Transport Scotland’s ferry services, that there was a £128 million difference between Transport Scotland’s cost estimate for the Clyde and Hebridean Ferry Service bid and the initial bid from CalMac.

The potential to achieve cost savings can be a benefit of competitive tendering however, It may also be possible to generate similar savings through other procurement methods.

We are currently undertaking a procurement policy review into future provision of our lifeline ferry services. The policy review will include consideration of the financial implications relevant to the procurement of ferry services in future, including the extent to which efficiencies can be achieved through either competitive tendering or the direct award of contracts to an in-house operator.

Question reference: S5W-12273

Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Monday, 30 October 2017
Current Status: Answered by Humza Yousaf on 9 November 2017

To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the suggestion that the £128 million difference between Transport Scotland’s cost estimate for the Clyde and Hebridean Ferry Service bid and the initial bid from CalMac, which was identified in the Audit Scotland report, Transport Scotland’s ferry services, illustrates the benefit of having competitive tendering.

Question reference: S5O-01432

Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 November 2017
Current Status: Answered by Humza Yousaf on 8 November 2017

To ask the Scottish Government what it anticipates the impact will be on its environmental and climate change targets of its plan to make the A9 Scotland’s first fully electric-enabled highway.

Question reference: S5W-12238

Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Friday, 27 October 2017
Current Status: Answered by Humza Yousaf on 7 November 2017

To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the Audit Scotland report, Transport Scotland’s ferry services, for what reason the Gourock-Dunoon route has the highest subsidy to cost ratio of the services provided under a public service obligation (PSO).

Question reference: S5W-12237

Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Friday, 27 October 2017
Current Status: Answered by Humza Yousaf on 7 November 2017

To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the Audit Scotland report, Transport Scotland’s ferry services, what its position is on whether the average passenger numbers on the Gourock-Dunoon route suggests that the current service level is excessive and inappropriate in respect to the needs of the community.

Question reference: S5W-12199

Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Friday, 27 October 2017
Current Status: Answered by Humza Yousaf on 7 November 2017

To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the Audit Scotland report, Transport Scotland’s ferry services, what action the agency is taking regarding considering the value for money of providing financial support for the Gourock-Dunoon route.

We welcome the publication of the Audit Scotland report, and recognise the need to continually review our approach to providing ferry services, and to reassess the needs of ferry users.

The Gourock – Dunoon ferry service provides a vital transport link for foot passengers between Dunoon town centre harbour and the rail head at Gourock harbour. The Scottish Government remains fully committed to this route, and the economic and social benefits it provides to the residents of Dunoon and the wider Cowal peninsula.

The public service obligation is set by the Scottish Ministers. The need for the service is defined by the impact it has on the wider economic and social sustainability of the community served. In its 2009 Decision on Scottish Ferry Services the European Commission concluded that there is a sound economic and social justification for public support of a passenger service on this route.

Service levels and subsidy required are dependent on the characteristics of the ferry service being provided.

An interim report on the emerging findings from our on-going policy review into the future procurement of Scottish Government funded ferry services will be published shortly. The report will outline the implications for each ferry service, including Gourock – Dunoon.

Question reference: S5W-11441

Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Monday, 25 September 2017
Submitting member has a registered interest.
Current Status: Answered by Annabelle Ewing on 20 October 2017

To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee report, Compliance by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland with its obligations under the Convention, which states that Scotland is not compliant.

The Scottish Government welcomes that the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee report recognised, 'the significant progress made to date'.

Further work is underway to strengthen Scotland's compliance with the Convention. The Scottish Civil Justice Council has just completed a consultation on enhancing the system of Protective Expenses Orders that assists those who are bringing litigation related to the environment.

Question reference: S5O-01335

Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Wednesday, 27 September 2017
Current Status: Taken in the Chamber on 5 October 2017

To ask the Scottish Government what plans it has to control the number of geese in the Highlands and Islands.