- Asked by: Cara Hilton, MSP for Dunfermline, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 December 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 5 January 2016
To ask the Scottish Government how many cleft palate operations have had to be redone due to a lack of success in the original operation in each of the last three years.
Answer
The information requested is provided in the following table:
Cleft Palate Surgical Repairs in Scotland
|
|
|
|
2012-13
|
2013-14
|
2014-15
|
Total
|
Palate Revisions
|
54
|
32
|
29
|
115
|
Standard coding of operations in NHS Scotland is unable to differentiate between revision surgery carried out to improve present palatal function and revision surgery carried out to correct failure of primary palatal surgery.
Some revision surgery may be for patients whose primary surgery was not carried out by any of the surgeons currently operating in Scotland.
- Asked by: Cara Hilton, MSP for Dunfermline, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 December 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 18 December 2015
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the statement by Derek Mackay on 8 December 2015 (Official Report, c. 10), how many HGVs have used the Forth Road Bridge in each year since 2005.
Answer
The following table shows the number of HGVs recorded as using the Forth Road Bridge from 2005-15:
Year
|
|
North
|
South
|
Combined
|
2005
|
HGV
|
1,363,122
|
1,391,482
|
2,754,604
|
2006
|
HGV
|
1,405,779
|
1,466,479
|
2,872,258
|
2007*
|
HGV
|
1,755,708
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
2008
|
HGV
|
1,390,895
|
1,528,927
|
2,919,821
|
2009
|
HGV
|
1,549,775
|
1,549,341
|
3,099,116
|
2010**
|
HGV
|
960,884
|
941,028
|
1,901,913
|
2011
|
HGV
|
869,645
|
863,539
|
1,733,184
|
2012
|
HGV
|
851,786
|
872,073
|
1,723,859
|
2013
|
HGV
|
878,767
|
895,272
|
1,774,039
|
2014
|
HGV
|
857,892
|
1,115,206
|
1,973,099
|
2015***
|
HGV
|
906,227
|
856,413
|
1,762,640
|
* Failure in southbound equipment
** Change in traffic counter equipment.
*** Data totals based on January to November only.
- Asked by: Cara Hilton, MSP for Dunfermline, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 December 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 18 December 2015
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the statement by Derek Mackay on 8 December 2015 (Official Report, c. 10), what action it is taking to encourage Stagecoach and ScotRail to work in partnership to deliver integrated public transport solutions for Fife commuters (a) while the Forth Road Bridge is being repaired and (b) after the Forth Road Bridge reopens.
Answer
Stagecoach and Scotrail have been fully involved in the development and implementation of the travel plan to address the needs of the travelling public. As part of our arrangements to develop and monitor the travel plan, all parties including Stagecoach and Scotrail, liaise routinely to monitor the plan and ensure that it best meets the needs of the travelling public.
- Asked by: Cara Hilton, MSP for Dunfermline, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 December 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 18 December 2015
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the statement by Derek Mackay on 8 December 2015 (Official Report, c. 10) what meetings it has had with Stagecoach regarding the (a) economic impact on Fife, (b) the impact on traffic congestion and (c) the travel time differences of operating bus transfers between Halbeath park-and-ride and Inverkeithing railway station instead of a bus shuttle service.
Answer
Regular discussions have taken place between Transport Scotland and Stagecoach throughout the period of the closure of the Forth Road Bridge. These discussions have focused on alterations to bus services with a view to minimising road congestion and mitigating the economic impact of the bridge closure in Fife and elsewhere. These plans include the use of the 747 shuttle bus service to provide a link between Halbeath and Inverkeithing Railway Station with an anticipated journey time of ten minutes.
- Asked by: Cara Hilton, MSP for Dunfermline, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 December 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 18 December 2015
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the statement by Derek Mackay on 8 December 2015 (Official Report, c. 10), what meetings it has had with Stagecoach regarding bus transfers between Halbeath park-and-ride and Inverkeithing railway station, and what transfer times were determined.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S4W-28882 on 18 December 2015. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at:http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx
- Asked by: Cara Hilton, MSP for Dunfermline, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 December 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 18 December 2015
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the statement by Derek Mackay on 8 December 2015 (Official Report, c. 10), what meetings it has had with Stagecoach regarding operating bus shuttle services between Halbeath park-and-ride and Inverkeithing railway station; whether these included discussions about the travel times and, if so, what the estimated times were, and for what reason it was determined that such a service would not be provided.
Answer
The travel plan to mitigate the travel disruption as a result of the Forth Road Bridge closure has involved Stagecoach as a key stakeholder, in their capacity as a major bus operator incorporating the Fife, cross Forth area. The links between Inverkeithing and Halbeath were discussed and it was agreed that passengers could use the 747 shuttle bus service with an anticipated journey time of 10 minutes between Inverkeithing and Halbeath.
- Asked by: Cara Hilton, MSP for Dunfermline, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 December 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 18 December 2015
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the statement by Derek Mackay on 8 December 2015 (Official Report, c. 10), what differences there are between the current and previous contract with the operators of the Forth Road Bridge in respect of the contingency plans to deal with a closure of the bridge.
Answer
There are no differences between the Forth Estuary Transport Authority plans and the current Amey Highways Ltd plans for contingencies on the Forth Road Bridge.
- Asked by: Cara Hilton, MSP for Dunfermline, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 December 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 18 December 2015
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the statement by Derek Mackay on 8 December 2015 (Official Report, c. 10), what discussions it has had with (a) agencies and (b) contractors regarding what contingencies are in place should adverse weather impact on the repair work that is being carried out, and what the outcome was.
Answer
Since the discovery of the defect, Transport Scotland officials have been working closely on a daily basis with Amey and their supply chain, to develop, design and implement the repair solution.
Contingencies are in place to ensure the works are undertaken as timeously as possible. The programme for the repair works includes an allowance for the level of adverse weather that might normally be expected at this time of year. Repair work is underway 24/7 with daily progress reports being received. We are as confident as we can be that the bridge will be reopened to traffic for the return to work in the 2016.
- Asked by: Cara Hilton, MSP for Dunfermline, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 December 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 18 December 2015
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the statement by Derek Mackay on 8 December 2015 (Official Report, c. 10), how much money it has provided toward the maintenance of the Forth Road Bridge in each year since 2000.
Answer
In the period from 2000 to the abolition of tolls on 11 February 2008 the funding of all Forth Estuary Transport Authority (FETA) operating and capital expenditure including maintenance was through toll income and other income generated by FETA through investments and interest.
On the abolition of tolls, a revenue and capital grant was payable to FETA by the Scottish Government. The revenue grant from the Scottish Government covered administration, maintenance and traffic operations. Budget allocation within the overall grant settlement was determined by FETA. The capital grant was paid to support capital works. FETA also supplemented the capital grant paid by the Scottish Government through the use of accumulated reserves.
The grant paid by the Scottish Government following the abolition of tolls is as follows:
Year
|
2007-8
|
2008-9
|
2009-10
|
2010-11
|
2011-12
|
2012-13
|
2013-14
|
2014-15
|
2015-16
|
Total 2007-16
|
Revenue
|
3.50
|
7.01
|
5.10
|
5.11
|
5.10
|
5.10
|
5.10
|
5.10
|
5.0
|
46.2
|
Capital
|
6.45
|
6.89
|
8.00
|
10.13
|
11.80
|
6.28
|
4.60
|
1.72
|
5.7
|
61.6
|
Total Transport Scotland Grant
|
9.95
|
13.97
|
13.10
|
15.24
|
16.90
|
11.38
|
9.70
|
6.82
|
10.7
|
107.8
|
- Asked by: Cara Hilton, MSP for Dunfermline, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 December 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 16 December 2015
To ask the Scottish Government how it ensures fairness in its employment practices.
Answer
The Scottish Government is committed to ensuring fairness in employment working practices evidenced through being the only government in the UK to have a dedicated Minister for Fair Work. As an employer the Scottish Government’s own employment policies and procedures far exceed legal obligations to provide a variety of flexible working practices and ensure all employees are treated with dignity and respect.
We continually review our employment policies and procedures to ensure that they are fair and equitable and do not have any negative impact on any group of staff. In June 2015 the Scottish Government was also recognised as a living wage accredited employer.