- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 02 February 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Humza Yousaf on 11 February 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether the recent reported attempts by Sri Lanka's police to try to stop the Tamil journalist, Punniamurthy Sasiharan, of Mamangam, Batticaloa, from covering a protest raises any concerns for it in relation to Police Scotland's provision of community training for Sri Lankan police officers, and what the reasons are for its position on this matter.
Answer
The current training programme provided by Police Scotland in Sri Lanka focuses on improving community policing and gender equality. All training is underpinned by the aim of upholding and improving human rights and all Police Scotland’s activities with the Sri Lanka Police Service are authorised in advance by the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office.
The programme is currently suspended due to the coronavirus pandemic and Police Scotland will re-evaluate delivery of the programme when restrictions on foreign travel are lifted. It is a matter for the Chief Constable of Police Scotland to agree the details of any training programme in Sri Lanka, and Scottish Government ministers would also consider requests for further deployments of officers, taking into consideration a range of issues, including an examination of human rights implications.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 02 February 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Humza Yousaf on 11 February 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide details of the vetting procedures for Police Scotland's work with Sri Lanka, in light of the recent recommendation from the UN High Commissioner on Human Rights for all member states to "apply stringent vetting procedures to Sri Lankan police and military personnel identified for military exchanges and training programmes".
Answer
The issuing of visas to foreign nationals coming to the UK to study is a matter for the UK Government.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 10 February 2021
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 18 February 2021
To ask the Scottish Government when it plans to take Scotland's railways back into public ownership.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 18 February 2021
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 26 January 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 10 February 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what advice was sought from the Federation of Environmental Trade Associations (FETA) at the design stage of the Queensferry Crossing about diverting traffic to the Forth Road Bridge when the Crossing is closed to traffic.
Answer
During the design stage of the Queensferry Crossing, no advice was sought from the Federation of Environmental Trade Associations (FETA) about diverting traffic to the Forth Road Bridge when the Queensferry Crossing is closed to traffic.
During the design stage of the Queensferry Crossing, Transport Scotland discussed the possible use of the Forth Road Bridge as a diversion route with a number of parties, including the Forth Estuary Transport Authority (FETA), and with City of Edinburgh Council and Fife Council, both of which were members of FETA.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 26 January 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 9 February 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether the option of diverting traffic to the Forth Road Bridge when the Queensferry Crossing is closed to traffic was considered at the design stage of the Crossing, and what the reasons were for its position on this matter.
Answer
The Forth Road Bridge was considered as a traffic diversion option during the design stage of the Queensferry Crossing and it was determined that the most appropriate use would be for it to become a dedicated public transport corridor. In that scenario, any other use would be to the detriment of public transport other than for emergency situations where it could be considered as an option.
The operational aspects of diverting the traffic involve significant traffic management measures on the approaches to the bridge. This takes several hours to complete. Consequently traffic must be temporarily diverted via the Kincardine Bridge.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 26 January 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 9 February 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what current plans there are to divert traffic from the Queensferry Crossing to the Forth Road Bridge when the Crossing is closed, and what the (a) timetable and (b) cost is of implementing those plans.
Answer
In emergency situations, the Forth Road Bridge is available to provide additional resilience as a diversion route, should the Queensferry Crossing have to close.
The first full live traffic trial for use of the Forth Road Bridge as a diversion route was successfully implemented on Saturday 30 January 2021. A report on this trial will be provided to Transport Scotland in due course, which will include an indication of timetable and costs.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 26 January 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 9 February 2021
To ask the Scottish Government how long the operator of the Queensferry Crossing takes to divert traffic to the Forth Road Bridge when the Crossing is closed to traffic.
Answer
Diversion of traffic from the Queensferry Crossing to the Forth Road Bridge takes approximately five hours, dependent on weather conditions.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 03 February 2021
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 11 February 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what it anticipates the financial impact will be on the lowest income groups of its proposal to freeze council tax.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 11 February 2021
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 26 January 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 3 February 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-34236 by Jeane Freeman on 26 January 2021, whether any application of DNACPR (do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation) notices on people’s care plans against their wishes or without their consent is a breach of their human rights.
Answer
As outlined in S5W-34236 on 26 January 2021, and in our CPR Guidance, it is important to acknowledge that CPR may not be an appropriate treatment for everyone. If a patient disagrees with the medical advice offered regarding the viability of CPR as a treatment option, then they are always entitled to seek a second opinion. However, healthcare staff cannot be obliged to carry out interventions that they judge are contraindicated or that may be harmful, and nor should they be.
This point is very clearly covered in our guidance on DNACPR, which is based on the principles set out in the Human Rights Act (1998) and the Adults with Incapacity Act (Scotland) (2000). It is also consistent with ethical guidance from the British Medical Association, Royal College of Nursing and the UK Resuscitation Council. For convenience the guidance can be accessed via the following link - https://www.gov.scot/publications/decisions-cardiopulmonary-resuscitation-integrated-adult-policy/ .
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 08 January 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 3 February 2021
To ask the Scottish Government how many doses of the COVID-19 vaccine have been wasted and had to be disposed of.
Answer
As of 25 January, our wastage estimate so far is 1.82%. That is well below our planning assumption of 5%, which accounts for worst case scenarios and is in line with global best practice.