- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 01 December 2014
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 4 December 2014
To ask the First Minister what response the Scottish Government has received to its representations to the UK Government regarding the implications of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership for health services in Scotland.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 4 December 2014
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 26 November 2014
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 3 December 2014
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to encourage people to attend further education courses.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 3 December 2014
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 October 2014
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 5 November 2014
To ask the Scottish Government how many people have been referred to the Edinburgh transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) centre since October 2012; how many were approved to receive TAVI; how many reverted to conventional surgery, and how many reverted to no procedure and palliative care.
Answer
The information requested is provided in the following table:
Table 1: People referred to the national TAVI service since October 2012
| Total referrals for consideration of TAVI | 317 |
| Those who need assessed | 22 |
| Those who need tests | 26 |
| Those who have had TAVI | 127 |
| Those suitable for TAVI | 12 |
| Those suitable for conventional surgery | 45 |
| Those not suitable for TAVI | 85 |
Source: National TAVI service, October 2014
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 October 2014
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Russell on 4 November 2014
To ask the Scottish Government what the salary has been of each (a) university and (b) college principal or chief executive officer in each of the last five years, and what the annual change in salary has been expressed as a percentage.
Answer
The information requested is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 October 2014
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 4 November 2014
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will publish a register of interests for all members of the independent review group considering the safety of mesh devices.
Answer
Yes, all declarations of interest(s) submitted by members will be circulated to the review group.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 October 2014
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 29 October 2014
To ask the Scottish Government how many pending litigations there are in Scotland in relation to defective mesh implants and against whom.
Answer
As at 22 October 2014, the Scottish Government has been made aware of the following potential or pending litigations against NHSScotland.
314 claims and summonses, of which 139 summonses have been served and 12 of which have been lodged.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 October 2014
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 29 October 2014
To ask the Scottish Government what clinical trials and studies into synthetic mesh products are being conducted in Scotland; how many have taken place since 1998, and how much each (a) NHS board and (b) doctor was paid for participating.
Answer
The information requested is not held centrally. The independent review of transvaginal mesh implants will appraise the current research evidence on synthetic mesh implants. The review will report early next year and will publish all clinical trials and studies appraised.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 October 2014
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 29 October 2014
To ask the Scottish Government whether it is considering new coding procedures for the recording of mesh-related adverse incidents and, if so, what procedures.
Answer
The independent review has invited a consultant in public health from NHS Information Services Division to support the group when considering coding of procedures.
The UK working group, chaired by Professor Keith Willett, on surgery using vaginal mesh is considering how data collection can be improved. This will include coding of mesh procedures.
The Deputy Chief Medical Officer is representing the Scottish Government on this group.
Additionally, NHS National Services Scotland is reviewing the national adverse incident reporting system in light of the under-reporting of pelvic floor mesh incidents. This has already resulted in the introduction of a new code specifically for recording and monitoring mesh-related adverse incidents.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 October 2014
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 29 October 2014
To ask the Scottish Government whether the independent review into mesh devices will publish all minutes and notes of its activity.
Answer
Yes, the Scottish Government intends to publish all minutes and relevant documents relating to the independent review, where appropriate.
All documents, once published, can be viewed at the following web address from mid November 2014:
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/About/Review/Transvaginal-Mesh-Implants
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 October 2014
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 29 October 2014
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has informed the European Commission (EC) of its advice to NHS boards regarding suspending the use of mesh devices pending the results of the independent review and whether it has contacted the EC Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks working group looking at the safety of surgical meshes used in urogynecological surgery in relation to this matter.
Answer
The Scottish Government wrote to the Chair of the European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks in May and June 2014 regarding the regulation of mesh implants.
The correspondence outlined the concerns raised by women who have experienced serious complications as a result of mesh implants.