- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 March 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 17 March 2017
To ask the Scottish Government whether it considers that the Independent Review of Transvaginal Mesh Implants has conducted itself in an impartial manner, and what its reasons are for its position on this.
Answer
Ministers and government officials have taken great care to allow the Review to take an independent view on the matter, and the members’ range of experiences and expertise was intended to ensure that a comprehensive examination of the situation was possible. This is a complex, technical area and the Scottish Government has given the Review wide latitude to prepare the report without interference from Government.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 March 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 17 March 2017
To ask the Scottish Government under what circumstances it considers that the use of medical mesh would be unavoidable, and whether the report of the Independent Review of Transvaginal Mesh Implants will confirm and describe these situations.
Answer
Decisions around the circumstances in which the use of mesh in any individual patient’s treatment is appropriate are a matter between the patient and the clinicians involved in her case. The Independent Review is expected to publish its final report during the spring. Health Boards will take appropriate action depending on the report's recommendations.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 March 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 17 March 2017
To ask the Scottish Government how many meeting of the Independent Review of Transvaginal Mesh Implants sub-group there (a) were before and (b) have been since October 2015, also broken down by location, and whether the minutes have been or will be circulated to the the review group's members.
Answer
The Chair of the Independent Review has confirmed that the clinician members of the review met twice; firstly in October 2016 (Edinburgh), and subsequently in January 2017 (Glasgow). In addition, the clinician members held a teleconference in January 2017. The nature of these meetings was to agree the content of the chapter of the final report for which the clinicians were responsible, and separate minutes were not therefore taken.
The Chair of the Review also held teleconferences with both the Scottish Mesh Survivors members and with the other patient representative in January 2017. These were informal discussions and were not minuted.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 March 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 17 March 2017
To ask the Scottish Government whether there are any situations in which standard non-mesh procedures cannot be provided by the NHS, and whether it expects the final report of the Independent review of Transvaginal Mesh Implants to identify and describe these situations.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S5W-07740 on 17 March 2017. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 March 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 17 March 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what impact it considers the resignation of two medical mesh-injured members of the Independent Review of Transvaginal Mesh Implants has had on the balance of the group.
Answer
The resignation of the two members was unfortunate, has caused me concern, and I plan to meet with Ms McIlroy and Ms Holmes shortly in order to properly understand their reasons for resigning. I am, however, aware that Ms McIlroy and Ms Holmes have contributed much to the Review over the past three years and would hope that this is reflected in the Review’s final report.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 March 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 17 March 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the average cost of (a) mesh and (b) non-mesh treatments for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.
Answer
The Scottish Government has not made an assessment of these costs.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 March 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 17 March 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what administrative, emotional and legal support it provides to lay members of the Independent Review of Transvaginal Mesh Implants group who have resigned.
Answer
The Independent Review’s secretariat has provided support to all members of the Review. This has included, amongst other things, the arranging meetings at convenient times and in appropriate accommodation, the arranging of teleconferencing facilities, the provision of hard copy papers, the refunding of travelling expenses, and other assistance upon request. Scottish Government officials are unable to provide legal advice.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 March 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 17 March 2017
To ask the Scottish Government how many pending legal cases there are that involve the use of medical mesh devices to treat hernias.
Answer
Records suggest that there are fewer than five current legal cases involving the use of mesh to treat hernias.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 March 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maureen Watt on 16 March 2017
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-06893 by Maureen Watt on 24 February 2017, when the additional investment of £150 million on mental health services started to be paid to NHS boards, and what share of this funding was included in each NHS territorial board budget in that financial year.
Answer
The commitment within the Scottish budget to invest £150 million over the next five years is from 2017-18 to 2021-22. Allocation decisions for 2017-18 are currently being finalised.
- Asked by: Neil Findlay, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 March 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maureen Watt on 16 March 2017
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-06893 by Maureeen Wattr on 24 February 2017, noting that this funding was listed in both the draft 2016-17 budget and the draft 2017-18 budget, whether the delivery of £150 million funding began in the financial year 2016-17 or will begin in 2017-18, and what the final financial year of the allocation of funds will be.
Answer
The commitment within the Scottish budget to invest £150 million over the next five years is from 2017-18 to 2021-22. £30 million is earmarked for allocation in 2017-18. The allocation profile for future years is currently being agreed, and will be subject to future Spending Review decisions.