- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 12 December 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 8 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20268 by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 7 December 2018, for what reason the Social Security Scotland Senior Management Team and Executive Advisory Body were appointed without anyone who identifies as black or minority ethnic, and whether there were any applicants who did.
Answer
I refer the member to question S5W-19666 on 13 November 2018 which provided applicants monitoring information in relation to Ethnic group for Social Security Scotland’s Executive Advisory Body.
Posts within the agency’s Senior Management Team were filled in line with the Scottish Government’s selection policy. In equalities monitoring, no applicant identified as black or minority ethnic in relation to ethnic group.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 13 December 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 8 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government whether the working assumption of its Social Security Directorate is for disability benefit rules and structures to remain broadly the same as those stipulated under disability living allowance, attendance allowance and personal independence payment.
Answer
The Scottish Government remains committed to creating a system of disability assistance that works for the people of Scotland. We have previously outlined a number of ways by which we will achieve this, including: an accessible and transparent application process; responsibility for sourcing supporting information sitting with Social Security Scotland, rather than the individual; significantly reducing the volume of face to face assessments; delivering an assessment service that offers individuals choice and control. Further development of disability assistance will be taken forward in consultation including Experience Panel feedback. It will ensure the safe and secure transition of payments and do so in a manner consistent with our ethos of treating people with fairness, dignity and respect.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 December 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 8 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government when it will provide a substantive answer to question (a) S5W-20346 and (b) S5W-20333, which received a holding response on 17 December 2018.
Answer
Scottish Government responded to the questions (a) S5W-20346 and (b) S5W-20333 on 20 December 2018.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 December 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 8 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what the estimated saving or cost is of its proposed social security policy on terminal illness, which requires registered medical practitioners to determine eligibility based on their clinical judgement, compared with the DWP policy on terminal illness, which is based on rules in which death "can reasonably be expected" within the next six months.
Answer
The financial impact will be depend on the CMO Guidance that is yet to be finalised. At this stage, it is not possible for Scottish Government analysts to estimate the financial impact.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 12 December 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 8 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20268 by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 7 December 2018, whether the interview panels for the Social Security Scotland Senior Management Team and Executive Advisory Body included anyone who identifies as black or minority ethnic.
Answer
Recruitment to Social Security Scotland’s Senior Management Team were made in line with the Scottish Government’s selection policy. The personal characteristics of panel members is not monitored or reported.
Appointments to the Executive Advisory Body mirrored the Ministerial Appointments process. The ethnicity of interviewers was not recorded.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 12 December 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 8 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to comments made by the Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Economy and Fair Work in The Times on 8 December 2018, when it requested access to DWP data for the purposes of mitigating the two-child benefit cap.
Answer
The Scottish Government has written on numerous occasions to the UK Government requesting that the two child limit be scrapped and have made clear our total opposition to the policy. This policy is part of Universal Credit which is a fully reserved benefit the Scottish Government has have no control over and cannot change.
By 2020-21 UK government cuts are expected to take around £3.7 billion out of the Scottish welfare system. It is not our policy to mitigate all of these UK Government welfare cuts, which are the equivalent of three times the Police Scotland budget. Pressure should be maintained on the UK Government to make changes to the policy and we will continue to call for such changes.
We are already investing over £125m in 2018-19 to mitigate the effects of UK Government welfare cuts and to protect people on low incomes - £20 million more than last year. The fact the Scottish Government has to take such action was described by the United Nation Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights as “outrageous”.
Comments made by the Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Economy and Fair Work referred to the legitimate assumption that any policies to directly top-up reserved benefits would need the agreement and cooperation of the DWP. Mr Mackay also said that “the best way to resolve it is to address the problem at source”.
The Tackling Child Poverty Delivery Plan sets out the many actions we are taking to increase family incomes and reduce living costs. That includes a commitment to work towards introducing a new income supplement, to provide additional financial support for low income families.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 13 December 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 21 December 2018
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20108 by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 7 December 2018, when the Social Security Programme Board is expected to give a formal view on the Go/No Go for (a) disability assistance, (b) carer's assistance, (c) employment injuries assistance, (d) cold-spell heating assistance, (e) winter heating assistance and (f) the income supplement.
Answer
The Social Security Programme Board considers dates for implementation, and associated Go/No Go decisions, as part of managed programme planning. They will give a formal view on Go/No Go in advance of implementation dates.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 11 December 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 21 December 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what (a) starting gate and (b) gateway reviews have taken place in its social security directorate.
Answer
The Social Security Directorate has worked with the Scottish Government Programme and Project Management Centre of Expertise to undertake three Social Security Programme Gateway 0 (Strategic Assessment) reviews (September 2015, March 2016, November 2017) and an Agency Gateway Review Healthcheck (May 2018).
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 28 November 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 20 December 2018
To ask the Scottish Government how much (a) its Social Security directorate and (b) Social Security Scotland (i) paid to the DWP (A) in 2017-18 and (B) since April 2018 and (ii) expects to pay to the DWP in (aa) 2018-19 and (bb) 2019-20, broken down by cost type.
Answer
The following tables reflect actual and forecast payments to DWP:
Payments for Implementation costs (actual and indicative) to DWP from Social Security Directorate
| Payment |
17-18 (actual) | £3.5 million (inc VAT) |
18-19 (actual to date covers period April – June) | £1.3 million (inc VAT) |
18-19 (forecast July – March) | £7.4 million (inc VAT) |
19-20 | Forecast figures currently being negotiated with DWP |
Implementation costs are the demonstrable and jointly agreed net costs to DWP wholly and necessarily incurred by as a result of the devolution of powers.
Payments for Running costs (actual and indicative) to DWP from Social Security Scotland
| Payment |
18-19 (to date) | £0 |
18-19 (indicative) | £4.2 million (inc VAT) |
19-20 (indicative) | £7.3 million (inc VAT) |
Running costs are the demonstrable and jointly agreed net costs to DWP for the provision of services to Scottish Government.
In addition to the above, the Social Security Directorate paid £38,467 for delivery of Universal Credit Scottish Choices from October 2017 to May 2018. Work is currently ongoing with DWP to refine forecast delivery costs.
Implementation costs for 2019-20 are currently being negotiated with DWP.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 07 December 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 20 December 2018
To ask the Scottish Government which local authorities have used television advertising to encourage applications to the Scottish Welfare Fund.
Answer
Administration funding is given to local authorities by the Scottish Government to maintain the Scottish Welfare Fund (SWF), raising awareness of SWF using this funding is at their discretion. The Scottish Government is not aware of television advertising being used by any local authorities to encourage applications to the SWF.