Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.
Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search. There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.
Displaying 3924 questions Show Answers
To ask the Scottish Government what consideration it has given to the possibility that administering medication covertly to an individual might be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which relates to an individual's right to respect for private life.
To ask the Scottish Government what consideration it has given to the possibility that administering medication covertly to an individual might be incompatible with Article 17 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which states that "Every person with disabilities has a right to respect for his or her physical integrity on an equal basis with others".
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the requirement under the Human Rights Act 1998 that public authorities must take account of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), what action it has taken to ensure that the NHS is aware of the ECHR case law suggesting that courts should take account of a person raising an action concerning being given non-consensual treatment before having an opportunity to appeal and, in light of this, what its response is to concerns that its mental health legislation permits such treatment to be made in these circumstances.
To ask the Scottish Government what action can be taken if an approved medical practitioner grants a short-term detention certificate after erroneously considering that the requisite conditions to do so have been met.
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the requirement under the Human Rights Act 1998 that public authorities must take account of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), what action it has taken to ensure that the NHS is aware of the 2012 ECHR judgement in the case of (a) X v Finland, which found that the forced medical intervention had interfered with X's physical integrity and (b) Gorobet v Moldova, which found that forced treatment that had not been shown to be a medical necessity could amount to degrading treatment.
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether compulsory mental health treatment can begin prior to the facts concerning the patient being established, and whether it considers that doing so would be consistent with the legislation, which suggests that such treatment should only be allowed in very strict circumstances.
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-06124 by Shona Robison on 25 January 2017, whether it will provide the uptake rates for 2016-17.
To ask the Scottish Government how many people with eating disorders have received NHS support in each year since 1999, broken down by NHS board.
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will accept the recommendation made by the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in April 2014 in its General comment and "abolish policies and legislative provisions that allow or perpetrate forced treatment...by psychiatric and other health and medical professionals".
To ask the Scottish Government how many people have not presented for cancer screening in each year since 1999, broken down by NHS board.