- Asked by: John Finnie, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 20 December 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Humza Yousaf on 3 February 2017
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-05382 by Humza Yousaf on 20 December 2016, in light of the minister’s comment that he would “shortly announce the way forward”, what its definition is of the term “shortly” and whether it will confirm by what date the announcement will be made.
Answer
I refer the member to the Statement I made in Parliament on 2 February 2017. Full details of my Statement are available on the Scottish Parliament website
http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/report.aspx?r=10768
- Asked by: John Finnie, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 11 January 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 26 January 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking alongside Transport Scotland to ensure that the dualling of the A9, and particularly its crossing of the River Spey, enhances the nature conservation value and ecological connectivity of the Insh Marshes National Nature Reserve, River Spey Special Area of Conservation and River Spey - Insh Marshes Special Protection Area.
Answer
Transport Scotland is currently undertaking an options assessment of the dualling over the River Spey. Options are being assessed across a range of engineering and environmental criteria to determine the best overall solution for this section of the dualling.
Across the A9 dualling programme Transport Scotland is working with Scottish Natural Heritage, Scottish Environmental Protection Agency, Historic Environment Scotland and the Cairngorms National Park Authority to ensure that the full range of environmental effects of the programme, not just ecology and nature conservation, are properly addressed and adequately considered as part of all decision making processes.
- Asked by: John Finnie, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 11 January 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kevin Stewart on 24 January 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what involvement it would anticipate having in the planning application should the proposed golf course at Coul Links in Sutherland be likely to have an adverse effect on the natural features for which the site is legally protected.
Answer
Where Scottish Natural Heritage has indicated that the proposed development may adversely affect a site of Special Scientific Interest or a Special Protection Area and has advised against granting planning permission, or has recommended conditions which the planning authority does not propose to attach to the planning permission, the application would be notified to Ministers, under the Town and Country Planning (Notification of Applications)(Scotland) Direction 2009, should Highland Council be minded to approve the planning application. This would allow Ministers the opportunity to decide whether, based on genuine national issues at stake, to call in the application for their own determination.
- Asked by: John Finnie, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 11 January 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kevin Stewart on 24 January 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions it has had, or plans to have, with Scottish Natural Heritage or The Highland Council regarding the proposed golf course at Coul Links in Sutherland.
Answer
An official from the Scottish Government made contact with The Highland Council, in September 2016, following submission of your previous Parliamentary Questions to ascertain the status of the proposal at that particular time. As it is, primarily, a matter for The Highland Council to fully consider any submitted proposal and the views of Scottish Natural Heritage, the Scottish Government has no plans to enter into discussions with either party at this time.
- Asked by: John Finnie, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 11 January 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kevin Stewart on 24 January 2017
To ask the Scottish Government further to the answer to question S5W-02282 by Kevin Stewart on 20 September 2016, whether it would consider that an adverse effect on the natural features, for which the Coul Links in Sutherland are protected under national law and international law and treaty, would constitute an issue of genuine national importance, and what the reasons are for its position on this matter.
Answer
It is not for Ministers to offer comment or pre-empt decisions to be taken by a planning authority. The Highland Council will be required to consult with the appropriate key agencies, in line with existing planning legislation, and to consider those consultees views fully during their own deliberations.
- Asked by: John Finnie, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 December 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Joe FitzPatrick on 19 January 2017
To ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to review its unacceptable actions policy.
Answer
The Scottish Government Unacceptable Actions Policy is in line with current guidance made available by the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman, however, a review is currently in progress as part of a process of continuous improvement.
- Asked by: John Finnie, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 December 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Joe FitzPatrick on 19 January 2017
To ask the Scottish Government how many of its decisions to invoke its unacceptable actions policy in each of the last five years resulted in appeals to the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman, and what the outcome of each appeal was.
Answer
The Scottish Government are not aware of any complaints arising from application of the Unacceptable Actions Policy being escalated to the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman.
- Asked by: John Finnie, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 December 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Joe FitzPatrick on 19 January 2017
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will review the guidance that it provides to Ministers to ensure that written answers to parliamentary questions fully address the issues they raise and provide the information requested.
Answer
The Scottish Government is committed to ensuring that members receive prompt, accurate response to their questions. The guidance on answering Scottish Parliamentary Questions has recently been updated and a copy has been placed in SPICe (Bib. number 58488).
- Asked by: John Finnie, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 December 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 19 January 2017
To ask the Scottish Government when a Scottish Minister last met the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority and what was discussed.
Answer
The Cabinet Secretary for Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform met the Chair of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority on 25 October 2016. The discussion covered NDA’s corporate plans and activities, especially in relation to its sites in Scotland.
- Asked by: John Finnie, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 December 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Joe FitzPatrick on 19 January 2017
To ask the Scottish Government on how many occasions in each of the last five years its unacceptable actions policy has been used and for what reasons, also broken down by directorate.
Answer
The Unacceptable Actions Policy was introduced by the Scottish Government in 2013 and is in line with guidance available from the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman. The Policy is used to address three main areas, aggressive or threatening behaviour, unreasonable demands and unreasonable persistence. It offers guidance, support and clarity to people coming in to contact with the Scottish Government and Scottish Government staff themselves on the appropriate way to handle unacceptable behaviour. There is no requirement to record when it has been adopted other than when it has been decided to restrict contact with the person. In these instances the record is retained only the minimum period required. These records are not centrally collated.