To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will publish on its website (a) detailed job descriptions of each member of the Infrastructure Investment Group, (b) details of what each member has done in relation to their role on the group, (c) the number of hours that each member spends on infrastructure investment business in each month and (d) an update every three months of what each has done in relation to their role.
My responses to the four separate points are as follows:
(a) Civil Servants agree with their managers objectives at the start of every reporting year (which runs 1 April to 31 March) as part of the annual performance management arrangements. Their objectives are personal data and would therefore not be publicly disclosed on the Scottish Government''s website under Data Protection provisions.
(b) As part of the programme of work in response to recommendations from Audit Scotland and the Public Audit Committee, the Scottish Government conducted a thorough review of governance of the Scottish Government''s capital programme. The main conclusion from this review is that we should establish an Infrastructure Investment Board (IIB) to take on an executive role in infrastructure governance. Further details of the IIB''s remit and membership can be found at:
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Government/Finance/18232/IIB.
Specifically, the IIB will:
provide strategic scrutiny of high-value major infrastructure projects at an early stage;
use robust management information to review the governance and delivery of the capital programme, including the Infrastructure Investment Plan (IIP), and, where appropriate, specific major projects;
provide advice to Ministers about capital investment priorities to inform decision-making; and
review portfolio-level governance and decision-making structures for capital projects to ensure these are fit for purpose.
In view of the establishment of the IIB, it was decided at the end of last year that the core information and best practice sharing activities between directors and key agencies currently performed by IIG should be merged with other official level groups. This in no way denigrates the worthwhileness of the IIG, but is simply a continuation in the ongoing process to improve financial governance of the capital budget sought by Audit Scotland and the Public Audit Committee.
The last meeting of the IIG took place on the 24 August 2010, with the first IIB being held on 1 November 2010.
(c) As indicated in my answer to question S3W-37255 on 26 November 2010, meetings of the IIG generally occurred only quarterly, with agenda items varying per meeting. This meant that individual contributions towards the group, both prior to and following meetings would have fluctuated depending on the agenda, what projects they were involved in and whether they were presenting a paper.
In terms of infrastructure investment work more generally, this also differs throughout the organisation, and also per month. The amount of time spent on such activities is very much dependent on what infrastructure investment projects individual divisions are leading or providing advice on, and as you will appreciate from the list of agenda items previously supplied to you, this can fluctuate over time. It should also be noted that work on infrastructure investment would be delegated within the areas senior staff are responsible for, and that simply providing senior staff hours does not provide information on the value of the work that the directorate or division has collectively provided.
(d) IIG has been disbanded and as such there is no further call on its members in relation to their work within the IIG. Information regarding the activities of IIB will be routinely published on the Scottish Government''s website.
All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament''s website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/Apps2/Business/PQA/Default.aspx.