To ask the Scottish Executive why it changed the recording category of abuser to show natural parent rather than natural mother and natural father in table 3 in its Statistics Publication Notice, Child Protection Statistics 2007-08.
The Scottish Executive did not change the recording categories of abuser to show natural parent rather than natural mother and natural father.
However, the Scottish Executive did not publish a separate breakdown for natural mother and natural father in table 3 of the 2007-08 Child Protection Statistics Publication Notice as previously published. The reason for this was it had become apparent during the quality assuring and analysing of the 2007-08 child protection data that some authorities were increasingly unable to provide accurate information as to whether it was the natural mother or natural father who was the primary known/suspected abuser.
The reasons being given by a number of local authorities were that the primary known/suspected abuser was sometimes the natural mother and natural father jointly (but the existing survey form was not allowing for this scenario to be recorded and reported, and therefore local authorities were being forced to specify whether it was solely the natural mother or the natural father, which was not strictly true).
Please note that after discussing this issue with local authorities, the 2009-10 Child Protection Survey form has been amended to allow for joint natural parents being the primary known/suspected abuser to be reported, as well as natural mother or natural father separately. The survey form has also been amended to cater for joint step parents to be reported (as well as step mother or step father separately).
We aim to re-introduce the publishing of this breakdown when the 2009-10 Child Protection Survey results are released in September 2010.