- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 11 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 23 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what strategies it will put in place to prevent pharmacists over-prescribing.
Answer
Pharmacists engaged in prescribing activity under the NHS will be subject to the same requirements for effective prescribing as other NHS prescribers such as general medical practitioners.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 16 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 23 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will use contingency funds to enable local authorities to implement equal pay.
Answer
The pay and conditions of local government staff are matters for local authorities who have an obligation, like other employers, to ensure that they comply with all employment legislation. In the current financial year, councils will receive a block grant from the Scottish Executive amounting to £8.1 billion (in addition to a number of other specific grants). The block grant is very largely unhypothecated and it is for councils themselves to determine how they spend this in line with local needs and priorities.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 16 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 23 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what (a) proportion and (b) amount of its budget has been allocated to local authorities in each year since 1999 to enable local authorities to implement equal pay.
Answer
A significant part of the funding allocated by the Scottish Executive to local authorities is through a block grant. Although the Executive provides funding for salaries and wages as part of this block grant, it is the responsibility of each authority as to how this money is allocated. The pay and conditions of local government staff are also matters for local authorities who have an obligation, like other employers, to ensure that they comply with all employment legislation. As a result, information on the amounts which authorities may allocate for equal pay is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 21 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what discussions it has had with (a) COSLA and (b) individual local authorities in respect of their obligations and progress in achieving equal pay and what the outcome has been of any such discussions.
Answer
The implementation of the Single Status Pay Agreement by local authorities has been raised in discussion between the Executive and COSLA and also between the Executive and a number of individual local authorities. However the position remains that the pay and conditions of local government staff are matters for local authorities.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 18 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-19881 by Lewis Macdonald on 3 November 2005, whether it can provide a source in order to obtain the required information relating to the non-vaccinated population and not specifically to MMR; whether it intends to collate such information itself in future, and what the reasons are for its position on the matter.
Answer
The existing immunisation database does not provide data on individuals with or without an autism spectrum disorder. The Scottish Executive does not intend to collect such information as worldwide consensus is that there is no evidence for an association between vaccines and autism. This is based on the US Institute of Medicine Report from 2004 on Vaccines and Autism, an executive summary of which is available at
http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10997.html.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 18 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-16967 by Mr Andy Kerr on 14 June 2005, what further meetings, talks, discussions and communications it has had with private health providers, organisations and individuals and what the outcomes were.
Answer
The Executive held a conference on 3 October 2005 in The Beardmore Hotel, Clydebank which was aimed at chief executives and chairs of NHS boards in Scotland, Independent Sector Providers and those involved in the planning and developing of NHS services. The purpose was to maximise contracting opportunities to increase service capacity, examine opportunities to strengthen relationships across public and independent health care boundaries and create a platform for innovative solutions.
The National Waiting Times Unit has regular communications and discussions with established independent sector providers in Scotland and the North of England on operational issues, particularly in relation to capacity available should boards identify a particular need to purchase additional activity. These providers are as follows:
Abbey Carrick Glen, Ayr
Abbey Caldew, Carlisle
Abbey Kings Park, Stirling
Advanced Centre for Eyecare, Glasgow
Alliance Medical
BMI Albyn, Aberdeen
BMI Fernbrae, Dundee
BMI Ross Hall, Glasgow
BUPA Murrayfield
Healthcare at Home
Nuffield, Glasgow
Nuffield, Newcastle
UK Medinet
Vanguard Healthcare
Woodlands, Darlington.
The National Waiting Times Unit have also had meetings with Netcare and Transmedica. These two meetings were at the request of the independent providers and the outcomes were an overview of their companies products.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 17 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what the total amount of capital charges paid by NHS boards (a) is in the current year and (b) has been in each of the last five years, broken down by hospital.
Answer
(a) The total amount of capital charges paid by NHS boards in each of the last five years is:
| 2000-01 (£000) | 2001-02 (£000) | 2002-03 (£000) | 2003-04 (£000) | 2004-05 (£000) |
Argyll and Clyde | 26,213 | 26,179 | 25,276 | 19,856 | 23,634 |
Ayrshire and Arran | 20,157 | 20,411 | 19,681 | 15,205 | 21,913 |
Borders | 6,595 | 6,375 | 5,704 | 4,652 | 6,011 |
Dumfries and Galloway | 9,064 | 7,304 | 7,703 | 5,951 | 5,772 |
Fife | 16,915 | 16,709 | 15,762 | 13,882 | 16,905 |
Forth Valley | 14,961 | 14,491 | 13,953 | 10,249 | 12,130 |
Grampian | 33,961 | 34,492 | 34,392 | 25,290 | 25,675 |
Greater Glasgow | 60,697 | 61,279 | 63,870 | 49,574 | 58,969 |
Highland | 13,870 | 13,949 | 14,006 | 11,362 | 11,400 |
Lanarkshire | 22,236 | 20,095 | 18,464 | 14,350 | 18,826 |
Lothian | 42,192 | 42,124 | 40,878 | 32,802 | 36,402 |
Orkney | 1,321 | 1,515 | 1,513 | 1,190 | 1,163 |
Shetland | 1,901 | 2,126 | 2,058 | 1,711 | 2,029 |
Tayside | 44,851 | 38,462 | 33,015 | 23,974 | 23,610 |
Western Isles | 3,938 | 4,393 | 4,547 | 3,487 | 3,712 |
State Hospital | 2,772 | 2,855 | 3,013 | 2,696 | 2,598 |
National Waiting Times Centre Board | - | - | 4,614 | 7,397 | 6,706 |
| 321,644 | 312,759 | 308,449 | 243,628 | 277,455 |
The boards’ capital charges are taken from the published annual accounts of the relevant NHS boards and trusts for each respective financial year.
Capital charges are made up of two elements:
depreciation - the amount provided during the year for all tangible and intangible fixed assets, and
cost of capital - the interest charge applying to the relevant net assets of the NHS board which is currently 3.5%.
In 2003-04, the cost of capital reduced from 6% to 3.5% of relevant net assets.
(b) The total amount of capital charges attributable to each hospital in each of the last five years is:
The information is given table 1 of “NHS Capital Charges 2000-05” a copy of which has been placed in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (Bib. number 38049).
The figures for capital charges are taken from Scottish Financial Return (SFR) 5.2, which is completed by each hospital and submitted to the NHS National Service Scotland Information and Statistics Division for publication in the Cost Book.
The 2004-05 are provisional figures and have not yet been finalised.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 15 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what data or documents it has provided to the Department of Health’s internal review in respect of haemophilia blood products and whether it has been able to provide sufficient documentation to that review, given the statement by the department that some documents have been destroyed.
Answer
The Department of Health commissioned a review in 2002 to clarify the facts surrounding the drive for UK self sufficiency in blood products in the 1970’s and 1980’s. If requested, the Executive provided copies of all relevant documents which it holds. However, were any Scottish documents held by the Department of Health subsequently destroyed, it would only have been their copies which were destroyed.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 15 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how it can accurately answer questions on the infection of haemophiliacs with blood products, given the statement by the UK Government that some relevant documents have been destroyed.
Answer
The documents relevant to this issue were retained by the then Scottish Home and Health Department. The files covering the period in question are currently being reviewed under the Freedom of Information legislation and documents will be released in due course.
It should be noted that because the production of plasma products was different north and south of the border, the issues are not the same and that therefore the relevant documents for Scotland are Scottish documents.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 15 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how many (a) accident and emergency, (b) intensive therapy, (c) high dependency, (d) acute medical receiving and (e) acute surgical receiving units there (i) have been in each of the last five years, (ii) are and (iii) will be if NHS board reorganisation plans are carried out.
Answer
The number of locations with intensive care units and an accident and emergency service for each financial year since 2001 is shown in the table. Information on the number of acute medical/surgical receiving units is not centrally available.
| Intensive Care Unit | High Dependency Unit | Accident and Emergency Service |
2001 | 27 | n/a | 97 |
2002 | 28 | n/a | 97 |
2003 | 27 | n/a | 95 |
2004 | 28 | 27 | 96 |
2005 | 28 | 30 | 95 |
Source: ISD(S)1.
NHS boards keep their services under review to ensure safety, quality and sustainability. If they want to propose major changes in services, they are obliged to consult on these and then submit their proposals to the minster for final decision.