- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 20 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will reconsider its policies in respect of contracting the private sector to provide clinical care.
Answer
The Scottish Executive will not be reconsidering its policies at present in respect of contracting with the independent sector to provide clinical care. Thousands of patients across Scotland have benefited already from our use of the independent sector, and we have been able to use the extra capacity provided to drive down waiting times across Scotland. However, we expect the same high standards for our patients wherever they are treated. It is for NHS boards to satisfy themselves that, in contracting with an independent sector provider, appropriate governance and monitoring arrangements are in place.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 17 January 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 3 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-21512 by Tavish Scott on 19 December 2005, whether there is any need for the Skye Bridge concessionaire to be in possession of an assignation statement identifying the concessionaire, regardless of when such a document is handed over.
Answer
Yes. Copies of both the Skye Bridge Assignation Statement and the subsequent Concession Agreement assigning the then Secretary of State’s right to charge and collect tolls at the bridge, were held by the concessionaire.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 17 January 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 3 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-21512 by Tavish Scott on 19 December 2005, by what method the identities of the concessionaire company and those of its principal shareholders were officially published in 1995 when tolling at the Skye Bridge first commenced.
Answer
These details were not published when tolling began. There was no statutory requirement to do so.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 17 January 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 3 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-21510 by Tavish Scott on 19 December 2005, why it considers that there was no requirement for the statutory identification statement publicising the assignation of ministerial rights in relation to the Skye Bridge Toll Order to be signed or dated.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S2W-16388 on 20 May 2005. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 27 January 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 3 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether any consideration has been given to the impact on the recruitment and retention of student and qualified nurses in NHS Fife and the future staffing requirements of the board of the proposal to relocate all nurse teaching currently provided in Kirkcaldy to Dundee.
Answer
Decisions about where, and how, pre-registration nursing and midwifery programmes are provided, are a matter for the higher education institutions who deliver them, in consultation with all other stakeholders including NHSScotland.
I have sought assurance that, before any decisions are reached, Dundee University will undertake a demonstrably robust and comprehensive consultation with staff, students and key stakeholders and discuss the outcome with the Chief Nursing Officer. Any discussions should include the effect of this proposal on recruitment and retention of students and nurses in NHS Fife.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 20 January 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 2 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether affordability issues influenced its decision to support abolition of the Rule of 85 in the Local Government Pension Scheme and, if so, whether it will publish the rationale.
Answer
I refer the member to the question S2W-22526 answered on 2 February 2006. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 20 January 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 2 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has received the report commissioned by the Scottish Public Pensions Agency in respect of the affordability of the Rule of 85 in the Local Government Pension Scheme; if so, what consideration it has given to this report, what conclusions it has drawn, whether it will publish the report and whether it will publish advice in relation to the report.
Answer
refer the member to the question S2W-22526 answered on 2 February 2006. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 January 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 2 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has chosen to accept the legal advice of the UK Government in respect of the removal of the Rule of 85 from the Local Government Pension Scheme and, if so, what advice within the Executive informed that decision.
Answer
I refer the member to the question S2W-22526 answered on 2 February 2006. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 January 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 2 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive which legal expert it consulted when considering the legal advice obtained by COSLA in respect of the removal of the Rule of 85 from the Local Government Pension Scheme.
Answer
I refer the member to the question S2W-22526 answered on 2 February 2006. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 January 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 2 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it took separate legal advice in respect of the removal of the Rule of 85 from the Local Government Pension Scheme; if so, whether it will to publish such advice and, if not, what its reasons were for not doing so.
Answer
I refer the member to the question S2W-21675 answered on 17 January 2006. That reply referred to the statement by the Minister for Local Government on 2 December 2006 in the House of Commons which confirmed that the UK Government had concluded that the Rule of 85 is to be removed from the Local Government Pension Scheme in England and Wales from 1 October 2006, and that this was necessary to comply with the terms of Directive 2000/78/EC.
In considering the legal opinion presented by COSLA on the removal of the Rule from the scheme in Scotland, the Executive took separate legal advice. It would not be appropriate to divulge the individual or individuals who gave that advice. That advice was given in confidence and I do not intend to publish it. It is a well-established principle that there is strong public interest in maintaining the right to confidentiality of communications between legal adviser and client.
The Scottish Public Pensions Agency (SPPA) has also received actuarial advice in respect of the affordability of the Rule of 85. That advice has been shared with COSLA and the trade unions and will inform the on-going discussions with them about possible transitional protection for existing staff. It is available on the SPPA website.