- Asked by: Jeremy Purvis, MSP for Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 29 October 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 9 November 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has an estimate of the proportion of spend on NHS distinction awards that relates to pension contributions.
Answer
As stated in my reply to your question S3W-35339 on 9 August 2010, information relating to the proportion of spend on NHS Distinction Awards that specifically relates to pension contributions is not available. The overall budget for distinction awards was frozen this year at £28 million.
- Asked by: Jeremy Purvis, MSP for Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 October 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 3 November 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it considers that the fertiliser market for agriculture operates in a manner that is fair for businesses.
Answer
The fertiliser market is subject to the normal regulatory and competition regimes, and driven by world supply and demand of nitrogen, phosphates and potash. Fertiliser prices in Scotland are dependent on currency exchange rate movements, which have also resulted in increases in the value of the Single Farm Payment in recent years. Farmers can keep their fertiliser costs down by following the Scottish Government''s Farming for a Better Climate programme and having soil analyses done so that they are not buying fertilisers unnecessarily.
- Asked by: Jeremy Purvis, MSP for Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 October 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 3 November 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive how many Scotland Rural Development Programme funding approvals have been made in each year since the programme’s inception.
Answer
| Food Processing, Marketing and Co-operation | Forestry Challenge Funds | Land Managers Options (LMO) | Less Favoured Area Support Scheme (LFASS) | Rural Priorities (RP) | Skills | Crofting Counties Agricultural Grants Scheme | Less Favoured Area Support Scheme (LFASS) |
2007 | - | - | - | - | 12,134 | - | - | - |
2008 | 38 | - | 3,851 | 209 | 12,490 | 833 | 7 | - |
2009 | 34 | 74 | 7,998 | 498 | 12,187 | 2,774 | 11 | 12 |
2010 | 29 | 35 | 10,349 | 393 | - | 594 | 9 | 550 |
There is no approval process for LMO or LFASS, rather beneficiaries need to meet eligibility criteria; therefore, the total number of LMO applications in each year is shown. For LFASS, the figures are for paid claims.
In addition to the RP approvals shown above, a further 392 cases have been approved through the forestry ongoing approvals process, launched in August 2009.
- Asked by: Jeremy Purvis, MSP for Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 October 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 3 November 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive how much capital has been approved for Scotland Rural Development Programme funding in the Scottish Borders in each year since the programme’s inception.
Answer
| Food Processing, Marketing and Co-operation | FCF | Land Managers'' Options (LMO) | LEADER | Rural Priorities |
2008 | £152,322 | £0 | £87,500 | £54,848 | £3,047,304 |
2009 | £0 | £25,200 | £366,500 | £8,310 | £8,280,022 |
2010 | £244,792 | £38,500 | £779,000 | £10,418 | £5,247,274 |
There is no approval process for LMO; beneficiaries need to meet eligibility criteria. The total value of the capital element of LMO for the Scottish Borders is expected to be as shown in the table.
There is no capital element to the Less Favoured Area Support Scheme.
- Asked by: Jeremy Purvis, MSP for Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 October 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 3 November 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive what research has been carried out regarding how many rural jobs have been created as a result of Scotland Rural Development Programme payments since the programme’s inception.
Answer
A mid-term evaluation of the Scotland Rural Development Programme is underway and will estimate the number of jobs created. The findings from the evaluation will be published on the Scottish Government website when available, expected to be early 2011.
- Asked by: Jeremy Purvis, MSP for Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 October 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 3 November 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive what the average amount of approved funding for the Scottish Borders under the Scotland Rural Development Programme has been in each year since the programme’s inception.
Answer
Elements of the Scotland Rural Development Programme are governed by different rules and eligibility criteria. It should be noted that, for Land Managers Options (LMO) and Less Favoured Area Support Scheme (LFASS), money is applied for and paid on an eligibility basis.
See the following table summary:
| Scheme | Food Processing, Marketing and Co-operation | Forestry Challenge Funds | LMO | LEADER | LFASS | Rural Priorities (RP) |
2007 | Funding | - | - | - | - | £6,014,203 | - |
| Cases | - | - | - | - | 628 | - |
| Average | - | - | - | - | £9,577 | - |
2008 | Funding | £152,322 | - | £140,000 | £507,543 | £5,972,611 | £5,573,271 |
| Cases | 2 | - | 150 | 9 | 694 | 82 |
| Average | £76,161 | - | £933 | £56,394 | £8,606 | £67,967 |
2009 | Funding | - | £25,200 | £461,000 | £448,529 | £5,961,152 | £17,221,083 |
| Cases | - | 4 | 511 | 12 | 632 | 250 |
| Average | - | £6,300 | £902 | £37,377 | £9,432 | £68,884 |
2010 | Funding | £244,792 | £38,500 | £1,413,000 | £538,662 | - | £10,186,631 |
| Cases | 2 | 1 | 731 | 11 | - | 60 |
| Average | £122,396 | £38,500 | £1,933 | £48,969 | - | £169,777 |
Funding under the Skills Development Scheme is to Scotland-wide industry organisations and related bodies and, while grant has not been specifically allocated to projects in the Borders, some of the £2.2 million allocated to date will be spent in the Borders.
There have been no awards under the Crofting Counties Agricultural Grants Scheme (CCAGS) in the Scottish Borders.
The 2010 awards for RP are a combination of the April assessment round, and ongoing forestry approvals from 1 January to 20 September.
- Asked by: Jeremy Purvis, MSP for Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 30 September 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 1 November 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it plans to pursue a process of national approval for argon gas-filled slimline double glazing, or similar products, in the replacement of window panes in listed buildings.
Answer
Recent research has demonstrated that slim profile double glazing can be accommodated successfully in historic window frames.
Under a project managed by Changeworks and funded by City of Edinburgh Council and The Edinburgh World Heritage Trust, a range of slim profile double glazed products were tested in a B-listed block of social housing in Edinburgh. The thermal and aesthetic results were good, and showed that improved glazing technology could be retrofitted to existing timber frames.
Ministers'' guidance is constantly evolving to take into account new technological advancements in development of glazing for use in listed buildings.
Exactly what option is used will depend on the circumstances and what survives. If the window is in good condition with original glass present Scottish planning policy presumes in favour of retention of all historic material, and other forms of upgrade should be used. If no original glass survives, retrofitting of double glazed units is likely to be permitted, retaining original timber. Given that it is not possible to specify a one size fits all approach, not least because not all windows in listed buildings are timber sash and case in style, my officials are currently producing revised guidance which takes account of the latest research and includes the option to use slim profile double glazing as part of the suite of works that can be considered to improve the energy performance of listed buildings.
- Asked by: Jeremy Purvis, MSP for Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 30 September 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 26 October 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the £111 million that was reported as being saved by the Scottish Futures Trust (SFT) in 2009-10 has remained in the SFT’s budget.
Answer
The £111 million of future benefits delivered by the Scottish Futures Trust (SFT) will not form part of the SFT budget.
- Asked by: Jeremy Purvis, MSP for Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 30 September 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 26 October 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive what mechanism is in place for deciding how the £111 million that was reported as being saved by the Scottish Futures Trust in 2009-10 will be deployed.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S3W-36651 on 26 October 2010. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament''s website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/Apps2/Business/PQA/Default.aspx.
- Asked by: Jeremy Purvis, MSP for Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 30 September 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 26 October 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the amounts stated as savings in the benefits statement of the Scottish Futures Trust will be externally audited beyond the methodology and underlying assumptions.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S3W-36657 on 26 October 2010. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament''s website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/Apps2/Business/PQA/Default.aspx.