- Asked by: John Scott, MSP for Ayr, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 June 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Susan Deacon on 9 August 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1O-1879 by Ross Finnie on 8 June 2000, who would be liable to pay compensation should it subsequently be revealed that a ha'ardous substance, caused by GM contaminated oil seed rape, had entered the animal and human food chain.
Answer
In the hypothetical situation to which you refer, I would advise that liability for the payment of compensation would be a matter for the civil courts and would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case.
However, I would like to repeat the advice of the Food Standards Agency that any oil derived from the GM affected oilseed rape, planted last year, is as safe for food use as oil derived from its conventional counterpart.
The Advisory Committee on Animal Feedingstuffs (ACAF) has also concluded that the adventitious presence of GM material in oilseed rape, at the levels reported, did not pose a threat to human or animal health via its use in animal feed.
- Asked by: John Scott, MSP for Ayr, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 June 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Henry McLeish on 18 July 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will make representations to Her Majesty's Government regarding the bringing forward of the landing craft contracts for Ailsa Troon shipbuilders in order to reduce the prospect of redundancies at the yard.
Answer
The Scottish Executive is in regular contact with the UK Government on a wide range of issues and MoD are aware of the importance of this order to Ailsa Troon.
- Asked by: John Scott, MSP for Ayr, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 29 June 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 13 July 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive why there has not yet been any consultation on sheep tagging in Scotland, when consultation papers have been sent out in England and Wales and what effect any delay in introducing sheep tagging will have on the export market for Scottish lambs.
Answer
I refer Mr Scott to my reply to question S1W-8655. I do not envisage that the proposals will have an effect on the export market for Scottish lambs.
- Asked by: John Scott, MSP for Ayr, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 20 June 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 4 July 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether, in view of the Stewart Report, it intends to consider the introduction of retrospective planning procedures for mobile phone masts.
Answer
We have no plans to introduce retrospective planning procedures for mobile phone masts.
- Asked by: John Scott, MSP for Ayr, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 June 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 3 July 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive why Sites of Special Scientific Interest are being created in Arran, Muirkirk, Galloway and elsewhere, encompassing more than 587,000 acres for the protection of Hen Harriers and other raptors, what consideration it gave to the available scientific information and advice in reaching its decision on such designations and what consultation was undertaken.
Answer
Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) is statutorily responsible for the notification of areas as Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs). It is Scottish Executive policy that SSSIs should normally be notified to protect areas selected as Special Protection Areas under the EC Birds Directive.
New SSSIs have been notified by SNH in Arran, Muirkirk, Galloway and Tayside to protect proposed Special Protection Areas (SPAs), for a variety of species including hen harriers. The proposed SPAs were identified by SNH using scientific information from a variety of sources and in accordance with published guidelines, which were adopted by Ministers in June 1999. On the basis of SNH's recommendation I accepted that these areas should be acknowledged as proposed SPAs, and that the owners or tenants of these sites, and other affected interests, should be consulted about their possible classification. Full consultation is undertaken by SNH on all SSSIs and, on behalf of Scottish Ministers, on all SPAs. In some cases, where new SSSI notification is required to underpin a proposed European site, consultations are undertaken simultaneously.
- Asked by: John Scott, MSP for Ayr, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 June 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Susan Deacon on 28 June 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what progress it has made regarding the implementation of the Pooley Report and what specific cost-cutting measures it proposes to introduce in the Meat Hygiene Service.
Answer
Of the Meat Industry Red Tape Review's 35 recommendations, three were rejected, three were for Agricultural Departments and 29 were for the Food Standards Agency (FSA).Of the 29 recommendations for the FSA, six require EU approval. As anticipated, four of these will be addressed in the context of the Commission's proposals for new food hygiene law, the first element of which is due to be published later this month (numbers 1, 6, 10, 11). Steps have been taken to progress the other two issues (7, 33). 23 recommendations do not require EU approval - four have been completed (numbers 17,19,20,22), one requires action next year (number 5) and the remaining 18 are being acted on.One of the recommendations (number 18) was the establishment of an Efficiency Review of the Meat Hygiene Service. The terms of reference for the review have been approved by the Deputy Chair of the Food Standards Agency and have been published in the Official Journal of the European Community. Independent consultants will be appointed to carry out a two-stage review. It is expected that an initial report will be with the FSA by the end of the year.With regard to the three recommendations which were for Agricultural Departments, I can report that discussions with the European Commission to facilitate the export of tallow and tallow derivatives are underway. It is envisaged that the Commission inspectors will visit the UK in the autumn to assess our proposed controls.
- Asked by: John Scott, MSP for Ayr, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 13 June 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jackie Baillie on 27 June 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive why it has invited the North Ayr Social Inclusion Partnership to create a Committee of 500 in Ayr, given that a Committee of 1,000 already exists in the South Ayrshire Council area, and what the expected benefits of the creation of a Committee of 500 will be for the area.
Answer
The establishment of People's Panels allows the SIPs to test attitudes, opinions and changes in quality of life, specifically in the Partnership areas, so that they can measure their progress over time. In this way the SIPs can ensure that their activities continue to be effective and that they are meeting local needs. Panels also allow the SIPs to gather particular information for monitoring purposes which would be difficult to gain by any other method.
North Ayr Partnership are in regular contact with South Ayrshire Council to establish how the different panels can complement each other.
- Asked by: John Scott, MSP for Ayr, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 29 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 22 June 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-4661 by Sarah Boyack on 21 March 2000, which sections of the A77 it intends to upgrade to near-motorway standard, and to detail the total indicative costs of the upgrade and the indicative costs for each phase of the upgrade.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has commissioned a feasibility study into the long-term upgrading of the A77 from Kilmarnock to Dutchhouse Roundabout to near motorway standard. Options are only at their formative stages and timescales and cost estimates will not be available until the study is completed in autumn this year.
- Asked by: John Scott, MSP for Ayr, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 21 June 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 22 June 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive when it will provide an answer to question S1W-5733, lodged on 29 March 2000.
Answer
This question was answered today.
- Asked by: John Scott, MSP for Ayr, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 June 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 22 June 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what action it plans to take regarding subsidy payments to farmers due to be paid in spring 2001 if a suitable Less Favoured Area support scheme to replace Hill Livestock Compensatory Allowances is not agreed with the European Commission.
Answer
Further discussions are being arranged with European Commission officials to help devise an area-based scheme which complies with the new Rural Development Regulation. The Scottish Executive's aim is to have a scheme in place so that payments can be made on the usual timescale next spring.