- Asked by: Bill Aitken, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 10 January 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Margaret Curran on 6 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will provide a list of all concordats that it has entered into with Her Majesty’s Government.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S2W-19786 on 31 October 2005, which lists current concordats between the Scottish Executive and UK Government. Since that date, one new concordat – on the Inquiries Act - has been agreed with the Department for Constitutional Affairs and a copy has been lodged with the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (Bib. number 38604).
All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Bill Aitken, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 10 January 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Margaret Curran on 6 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-6045 by Mr Andy Kerr on 12 March 2005, which joint ministerial committee meetings it has attended since February 2004; where each joint ministerial committee meeting took place; which ministers attended, and what issues were discussed.
Answer
There have been no meetings of the full joint ministerial committee (JMC) since 1 February 2004.
The following table provides a complete list of Scottish Executive ministerial attendance at all joint ministerial sub-committee meetings that have taken place since 1 February 2004.
Subject | Date | Venue | Scottish Minister |
Europe | 3 February 2004 | London | Minister for Health and Community Care |
Europe | 24 February 2004 | London | No Scottish Minister was able to participate. Anne McGuire MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Scotland represented Scotland’s interests |
Europe | 18 March 2004 | London | Minister for Justice |
Europe | 27 April 2004 | London | Deputy Minister for Health and Community Care |
Europe | 27 May 2004 | London | Minister for Finance and Public Services |
Europe | 23 June 2004 | London | No Executive Minister was able to participate |
Europe | 20 July 2004 | London | No Executive Minister was able to participate |
Europe | 14 September 2004 | London | Minister for Health and Community Care |
Europe | 20 October 2004 | London | Minister for Parliamentary Business |
Europe | 29 November 2004 | London | Minister for Finance and Public Service Reform |
Europe | 24 January 2005 | London | Deputy Minister for Enterprise and Lifelong Learning |
Europe | 15 March 2005 | London | Deputy Minister for Finance and Public Service Reform |
Europe | 25 May 2005 | London | Minister for Finance and Public Service Reform |
Europe | 14 June 2005 | London | Minister for Finance and Public Service Reform |
Europe | 14 September 2005 | London | Minister for Finance and Public Service Reform |
Europe | 11 October 2005 | London | Deputy Minister for Enterprise and Lifelong Learning |
Europe | 14 November 2005 | London | Deputy Minister for Finance and Public Service Reform |
Europe | 17 January 2006 | London | Minister for Finance and Public Service Reform |
The proceedings of joint ministerial committee or sub-committee meetings are published by the UK Government in the form of a communiqué on behalf of all parties. The issues discussed at each meeting are not necessarily disclosed. These can be found at:
http://www.dca.gov.uk/constitution/devolution/jmc.htm.
- Asked by: Bill Aitken, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 January 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 12 January 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive how it is addressing any increased levels of fly-tipping in Glasgow, especially after the Christmas period.
Answer
Tackling fly-tipping in Glasgow is a matter for the relevant bodies. Local authorities and the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency can require the removal of illegally dumped waste or remove it themselves. They act within a national framework of law and guidance.
- Asked by: Bill Aitken, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 22 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 5 December 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive in how many cases where arrest warrants have been issued by Glasgow District Court and Glasgow Sheriff Court no proceedings were taken by the Procurator Fiscal in each of the last five years.
Answer
The following table provides details of the number of accused where court proceedings were initiated and a warrant was issued by Glasgow Sheriff Court or Glasgow District Court but the warrant was subsequently withdrawn by the Procurator Fiscal and the case against the accused closed. The table relates to accused recorded in the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service”s Case Management Database as having a last marking of “No Further Proceedings – Warrant Withdrawn”. It is possible that there were some accused whose cases were marked as “No Further Proceedings” for other reasons (eg “Accused Dead”, “Accused in Prison” or “Acceptable Explanation Offered”) where a warrant had been issued at some stage during the proceedings, but such cases are not readily identifiable from the information held on the Database.
Accused Marked “No Further Proceedings – Warrant Withdrawn”: Glasgow1
Year2 | Number of Accused | Total Number of Court Appearances During Year Resulting in Grant of Warrant |
2002-03 | 1,825 | 25,487 |
2003-04 | 2,813 | 20,130 |
2004-05 | 1,160 | 16,808 |
Notes:
1. The information in this table has been extracted from the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service’s Case Management Database. The database is a live, operational database used to manage the processing of reports submitted to Procurators Fiscal by the police and other reporting agencies.
2. The Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service completed an upgrade of its electronic case management system in April 2002. Only case records created after that date contain complete data which is capable of electronic analysis.
- Asked by: Bill Aitken, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 September 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Peter Peacock on 17 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-16781 by Peter Peacock on 2 June 2005, which schools took part in the OECD's "PISA 2003" survey, broken down by (a) local authority area and (b) sector.
Answer
It is not our policy to make public the identity of individuals and organisations that take part in Scottish Executive commissioned research. This is to ensure that responses can not be directly attributed to individuals and to encourage individuals and organisations to participate in research. When schools agreed to participate in the OECD’s PISA 2003 study they were given a written assurance of anonymity: “We take great care to preserve the anonymity of schools that take part in these studies and will not disclose their identity to anyone outwith those involved in the research and your Education Authority”.
- Asked by: Bill Aitken, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 01 September 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 29 September 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how many fines of £200 or less were remitted by Glasgow District Court following breaches of supervised attendance orders from 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005.
Answer
The information requested is not available.
The latest available statistics show that 12 breach applications in relation to supervised attendance orders were made to Glasgow City District Court in the year ending 31 March 2004.
- Asked by: Bill Aitken, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 01 September 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 29 September 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how many supervised attendance orders were issued by Glasgow District Court in respect of non-payment of fines from 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005.
Answer
Figures for this period are not yet available. The latest available statistics show that for the year ending 31 March 2004 Glasgow City District Court reported a total of 40 financial penalties resulting in a supervised attendance order being imposed for non-payment.
- Asked by: Bill Aitken, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 25 July 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 2 September 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what percentage of crimes and offences have resulted in a conviction in each of the last 10 years.
Answer
The available information is given in the table. The statistics dealing with recorded crime and court proceedings are not directly comparable for a number of reasons. A person may be proceeded against for more than one crime or offence involving more than one victim, and a crime may be recorded in one year and proceedings taken in a subsequent year. Crimes and offences committed by children will also generally be dealt with through the children’s hearings system rather than courts, while many minor offences such as motoring offences will typically be dealt with by alternatives to prosecution such as police or Procurator Fiscal conditional offers of fixed penalties.
Persons with a charge proved in Scottish courts expressed as a percentage of crimes and offences recorded by the police, 1994-2003:
Year | % |
1994 | 17 |
1995 | 17 |
1996 | 17 |
1997 | 17 |
1998 | 15 |
1999 | 14 |
2000 | 13 |
2001 | 13 |
2002 | 13 |
2003 | 13 |
- Asked by: Bill Aitken, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 June 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 20 June 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how many opinions the Scottish Legal Services Ombudsman issued in (a) 2000-01, (b) 2001-02, (c) 2002-03, (d) 2003-04 and (e) 2004-05.
Answer
The figures are as follows:
2000-01 | 164 |
2001-02 | 169 |
2002-03 | 210 |
2003-04 | 323 |
These figures are given in the Annual Reports of the Scottish Legal Services Ombudsman for 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03, 2003-04, copies of which are available in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (Bib. numbers 14580, 22484, 28277, 33250). They are also available at
http://www.slso.org.uk/reports.html. The figure for 2004-05 will be provided in the Ombudsman’s Annual Report for that year which is to be published in July.
- Asked by: Bill Aitken, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 June 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 20 June 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what targets the Scottish Legal Services Ombudsman sets herself in respect of (a) responding to correspondence, (b) investigating a handling complaint and (c) producing an opinion on a handling complaint.
Answer
The ombudsman’s current targets are:
(a) To acknowledge new complaints within two working days of receipt and to answer letters about current cases within five working days of receipt.
(b) and (c) to complete 75% of Opinions within eight weeks and 95% of Opinions within 13 weeks.
Targets are set out in the Annual Reports of the Scottish Legal Services Ombudsman for 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03, 2003-04, copies of which are available in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (Bib. numbers 14580, 22484, 28277, 33250) or on the ombudsman’s website at http://www.slso.org.uk/reports.html.