- Asked by: Tommy Sheridan, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 16 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what its response is to the accessibility study on acute services considered at the meeting of Greater Glasgow NHS Board on 29 January 2002 and, in particular, the statement that by reducing the numbers of accident and emergency departments in the board area from five to two locations and in-patient sites from five to three locations, 60% of patients will experience mean journey time savings.
Answer
While I welcomed the publication of the full accessibility study at the end of October 2002, this is only the beginning of the transport planning process, which will form an integral and vital part of the implementation programme in the months and years ahead. It is, therefore, essential that a robust public transport strategy is in place. The projected appreciable mean journey savings for a large percentage of patients is based on the following factors:
The pattern of acute hospitals that will emerge from the Acute Services Strategy maintains local access to the bulk of services, which are now delivered on an out-patient, day case or day surgery basis;The provision of ambulatory care hospitals at Stobhill and the Victoria Infirmary will make a number of specialties more locally accessible on an out-patient/day case basis for the first time. Examples include kidney dialysis and chemotherapy provision, andThe accident and emergency (A&E) proposals include two 24-hour consultant-lead A&E/Trauma Centres, an Emergency Receiving Centre at each in-patient hospital, five Minor Injury Units and a dedicated A&E Unit for children at Yorkhill Hospital.NHS Greater Glasgow must, however, continue to analyse the current transport systems and travelling patterns against the new hospital proposals to identify and address any mismatches. It must also enter into close engagement with the Strathclyde Passenger Transport Executive and in full discussion with the Scottish Ambulance Service. I expect NHS Greater Glasgow to fully involve local people in these discussions.
- Asked by: Tommy Sheridan, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 16 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will make special arrangements for patients and visitors to reach designated hospitals in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board area should the proposals for the provision of acute services be implemented.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-32145 today. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
- Asked by: Tommy Sheridan, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 03 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 13 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-31556 by Mr Jim Wallace on 25 November 2002, whether it is consulted prior to the implementation of any interception warrants in respect of people resident in Scotland; what facility exists for such people to ascertain whether an interception warrant has been authorised against them, and whether there is any procedure facilitating appeal against such authorisation.
Answer
The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 is reserved, but certain limited functions have been devolved to the Scottish ministers in relation to serious crime in or as regards Scotland.The issue of interception warrants by the UK Government in the interests of national security or for the purpose of safeguarding economic well-being is a reserved matter and there is no statutory requirement for the Scottish ministers to be consulted about such warrants where these are in respect of people resident in Scotland.The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 established an independent tribunal (the Investigatory Powers Tribunal) to consider complaints from members of the public about conduct alleged to involve interception of communications by the intelligence services and certain public authorities.
- Asked by: Tommy Sheridan, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Iain Gray on 12 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-31500 by Iain Gray on 26 November 2002, why it does not hold centrally accurate and complete information about the (a) level of foreign disinvestment and company closures, (b) number of associated job losses and (c) level of public financial support provided to each company involved; what action it will take to ensure that it holds such information centrally in the future, and whether holding such information centrally would be beneficial to identifying the number of jobs available, assessing the health of the economy and calculating how much public financial support to make available to companies.
Answer
As indicated in response to question S1W-31500, there are limitations to the readily available information sources. For example, we may not be made aware of job losses if intended redundancies are below the threshold of 20 in any one month at which the Department of Trade and Industry needs to be informed under the Trade Union and Labour Relation (Consolidation) Act 1992.The main form of financial support provided to inward investors is under the Regional Selective Assistance (RSA) scheme, though other forms of assistance are provided by the Enterprise Networks. For those companies in receipt of RSA, the Executive maintains records from the point at which grant has been offered to the point at which the company has discharged all its contractual obligations in respect of RSA.We assess the health of the economy in a number of ways and recognise the importance of robust economic statistics in monitoring economic progress and in underpinning economic policy development.
- Asked by: Tommy Sheridan, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Iain Gray on 12 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-31551 by Iain Gray on 26 November 2002, what arrangements it makes to liase with Her Majesty's Government in relation to the implementation of the national minimum wage in Scotland and its impact on eradicating poverty and what information it received about how many employees in Scotland are paid less than the minimum wage and on what action is being taken against employers that are acting illegally.
Answer
The Scottish Executive is in regular contact with the UK Government on a broad range of matters including the national minimum wage, but has no functions in relation to the implementation or the enforcement of the minimum wage.
- Asked by: Tommy Sheridan, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 12 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it made its decision on the provision of acute services in Glasgow taking into account the summary of the accessibility study published for the meeting of the Greater Glasgow NHS Board on 29 January 2002.
Answer
Yes.
- Asked by: Tommy Sheridan, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 27 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 11 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what the cost would be of an (a) 50% and (b) 80% tie-up for (i) one, (ii) two and (iii) three years for the white fishing fleet.
Answer
The overall costs of any such approach would depend on the basis on which eligibility for, and amounts of, such aid was determined. Very substantial levels of aid would be needed if it were to make a significant impact on fishing activity. Any scheme of assistance would also need to respect the appropriate provisions in EC law, notably Article 16 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999.
- Asked by: Tommy Sheridan, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 08 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 11 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there is any evidence of late payment of bills to businesses by public bodies.
Answer
The Scottish Executive and other public bodies are committed to pay invoices promptly and their internal policies require this. The Scottish Executive observes the CBI prompt payment code and British Standard 7890. Public bodies record their payment performance in published annual accounts.
- Asked by: Tommy Sheridan, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 27 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 10 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what average compensation is paid to skippers/owners of decommissioned white fish fishing vessels.
Answer
Under the Fishing Vessels (Decommissioning) (Scotland) Scheme 2001, payments totalling just over £24.8 million were made to the owners of 98 fishing vessels. That equates to an average of just over £253,700 per vessel. Individual payments reflected the amount vessel owners bid under the competitive tendering arrangements which were part of the scheme.
- Asked by: Tommy Sheridan, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 27 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 10 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what the estimated decommissioning costs are for white fish fishing vessels this year and how many, and what percentage of, vessels have been decommissioned.
Answer
Ninety-eight vessels were decommissioned under the Fishing Vessels (Decommissioning) (Scotland) Scheme 2001 at a cost of a little over £24.8 million. The capacity of these vessels represented a little over 18% of the capacity of the vessels eligible for the scheme (measured in terms of tonnage).