- Asked by: Stewart Stevenson, MSP for Banff and Buchan, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 April 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 9 May 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how many chiropodists are currently eligible for retirement at 60 and, of these, how many could retire in each of the next three years, broken down by NHS board.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S2W-15798 on 9 May 2005. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Stewart Stevenson, MSP for Banff and Buchan, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 08 April 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 5 May 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how much it forecasts spending to be on upgrading visitor, staff and administrative facilities in each prison in the next five years.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:
“The SPS’s Estate Development Programme will in the next five years give priority to the elimination of the practice of slopping-out by replacing out-of-date prisoner accommodation with modern facilities. SPS is seeking to provide completely redeveloped prisons at HMP Edinburgh, HMP Glenochil, HMP Perth and HMYOI Polmont during this period. Some upgrading of visitor, staff and administrative facilities will be incorporated in this programme. Separate costings for these facilities are not available at this stage of the process.”
- Asked by: Stewart Stevenson, MSP for Banff and Buchan, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 08 April 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 5 May 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how much has been spent on upgrading visitor, staff and administrative facilities in each prison in the last five years.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:
“During the last five years, the SPS’s Estate Development Programme included a new health centre and staff facility at HMP Shotts (combined project value of £1.5m), a visits upgrade at HMP Edinburgh (project value of £1.5m), staff facility at HMP Glenochil (project value of £0.7m) and some improvements to staff and administrative facilities at HMP Aberdeen and HMP Greenock as part of wider prison developments (combined project values of £0.7m and £1.6m respectively).”
- Asked by: Stewart Stevenson, MSP for Banff and Buchan, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 April 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 5 May 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-3285 by Tavish Scott on 9 December 2003, whether it will publish an updated version of the answer reconciling the totals with the data in the table.
Answer
The following table gives, for each council tax band, the estimated percentage of households in each household income band. For example, an estimated 25% of households occupying a Band A dwelling have a gross household income of £150 or less per week, excluding any Council Tax Benefit income. These figures are based upon survey data from 2002-03 and 2003-04.
The Council Tax Band occupied by a household, however, does not equate directly to the Council Tax bill. Many households with low incomes will qualify for Council Tax Benefit, and will therefore pay little or no council tax from their gross income.
| | Gross household income excluding Council Tax Benefit (£ per week) | |
| Council Tax Band | Up to 150 | 150 to 300 | 300 to 450 | 450 to 600 | 600 to 750 | Over 750 | TOTAL |
| Band A | 25 | 40 | 16 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 100 |
| Band B | 15 | 34 | 19 | 14 | 10 | 9 | 100 |
| Band C | 10 | 26 | 20 | 18 | 11 | 15 | 100 |
| Band D | 7 | 20 | 17 | 17 | 14 | 24 | 100 |
| Band E | 5 | 13 | 15 | 15 | 14 | 38 | 100 |
| Band F | 15 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 51 | 100 |
| Band G & H | 11 | 14 | 9 | 66 | 100 |
Note: The percentage of households in each cell has been estimated using data from the Family Resources Survey aggregated over two years. Where the sample size is insufficient to allow confident estimation, cells have been merged. The incomefigures reported are gross household income from all sources less any income received as Council Tax Benefit. Percentages are reported to the nearest whole number and may not sum to 100% due to rounding.
- Asked by: Stewart Stevenson, MSP for Banff and Buchan, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 April 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 5 May 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-19628 by Angus MacKay on 15 November 2001, whether it will publish an updated version of the answer providing a total derived from the data in the table.
Answer
Identified allocations of funding to be made by the Scottish Executive to Argyll and Bute Council in financial year 2005-06 are shown in the table below. In addition, the Executive provides a range of other grants to local authorities, some of which are substantial, but for which information is either not held centrally on the breakdown by local authority area (for example grant made to the Strathclyde Joint Police Board) or where at this stage in the financial year the breakdown of funding by local authority area is not yet known (such as grants under the European Regional Development Fund).
| Category | Amount allocated |
| Support for core services through Aggregate External Finance | £167,159,000 |
| Supported new in-year capital borrowing | £11,137,000 |
| School Travel Co-ordinators | £17,000 |
| 20mph Speedzones and homezones | £211,000 |
| Cycling, walking and safer streets | £156,000 |
| Rural Public Passenger Transport Grant | £489,000 |
| Contaminated Land Grant | £72,000 |
| Anti-social Behaviour | £204,700 |
| Housing Support Grant | £135,000 |
| Strategic Waste Fund | £1,851,000 |
| Community Regeneration Fund | £986,000 |
| Community Voices Programme | £60,000 |
| Bus Route Development Grant | £328,000 |
| Determined to Succeed | £200,590 |
| Incentive Scheme | £6,000 |
| Private Sector Housing Grant | £15,000 |
| Homelessness Task Force | £376,700 |
| Furniture Grant | £57,534 |
| Implementation of Youth Justice Measures in ASB strategy | £161,000 |
| Workforce Development Fund | £112,122 |
| Children’s Hearings (legal representation) | £2,500 |
| Support for Care Leavers | £58,270 |
| Additional Funding for Foster Care | £43,700 |
| Public Transport Fund | £1,595,000 |
| Flood Prevention and Coast Protection | £123,000 |
| Schools Fund | £1,943,000 |
| Supporting People | £13,782,000 |
| Child Protection | £20,000 |
| Warm Deal | £16,000* |
| Educational Maintenance Allowance | £250,000* |
| Piers and Harbours | £3,724,000* |
| Total | £201,302,116 |
Note: Figures marked with an asterisk are estimates. Actual expenditure will depend on the uptake of grants during the year, some of which are demand-led.
- Asked by: Stewart Stevenson, MSP for Banff and Buchan, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 April 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 5 May 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-24402 by Lewis Macdonald on 26 April 2002, whether it will publish an updated version of the answer reconciling the totals with the data in the table.
Answer
The data in the table set out in the answer to S1W-24402 by Lewis Macdonald on 26 April 2002 were taken from the nine regional leaflets which were issued to accompany the publication of
Scotland’s Transport: Delivering Improvements.
The City of Glasgow area appeared in both the West of Scotland 2 and Westof Scotland 3 leaflets, and therefore figured in two rows of the written answer’s table. Glasgow was, however, counted only once in the all-Scotland totals, making the sum of the individual columns greater than the Scotland totals.
I attach a revised table which makes this clearer.
| Region | Population | Total Cost (£million) | Cost Per Capita (£) | Schemes |
| Highlands and Islands | 325,890 | 71.029 | 217.95 | 193 |
| North East Scotland | 525,300 | 39.622 | 75.43 | 75 |
| Northern Isles | 42,340 | 16.741 | 395.39 | 69 |
| South East Scotland 1 | 884,900 | 145.238 | 164.13 | 66 |
| South East Scotland 2 | 277,600 | 39.541 | 142.44 | 31 |
| Tay | 737,500 | 71.303 | 96.68 | 105 |
| West of Scotland 1 | 521,400 | 73.358 | 140.69 | 99 |
| West of Scotland 2 (excluding Glasgow) | 533,610 | 49.752 | 93.20 | 14 |
| West of Scotland 3 (excluding Glasgow) | 659,220 | 46.352 | 70.30 | 37 |
| Glasgow | 611,440 | 112.279 | 183.60 | 20 |
| Scotland | 5,119,200 | 665.215 | 129.95 | 709 |
- Asked by: Stewart Stevenson, MSP for Banff and Buchan, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 April 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 5 May 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-9694 by Mr Sam Galbraith on 20 September 2000, whether it will publish an updated version of the answer reconciling the totals with the data in the table.
Answer
The number of secure units which are or have been operational in Scotland since 1996 are noted below:
| Local Authority Area | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Angus Council* | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| City of Edinburgh | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| East Dunbartonshire** | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| North Ayrshire*** | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dumfries & Galloway**** | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fife**** | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| City of Dundee | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
* Rossie School, near Montrose is operated by an independent organisation
** St Mary’s Kenmure, Bishopbriggs, is operated by an independent organisation
*** Kerelaw School, Stevenston, is operated by Glasgow City Council
**** Secure Accommodation facilities in Fife & Dumfries & Galloway are no longer operational
- Asked by: Stewart Stevenson, MSP for Banff and Buchan, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 April 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 5 May 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-15621 by Sarah Boyack on 17 May 2001, whether it will publish an updated version of the answer reconciling the total with the data in the table.
Answer
A complete list of all the respondents to the Strategic Priorities for Scotland’s Passenger Railway consultation, published December 2000, is in the Scottish Executive Library and available on-line at
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library3/transport/spspr-19.asp
- Asked by: Stewart Stevenson, MSP for Banff and Buchan, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 April 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 5 May 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-14046 by Hugh Henry on 25 February 2005, whether it will publish an updated version of the answer reconciling the totals with the data in the table.
Answer
I can confirm that the information provided in my reply to question S2W – 14046 was inaccurate. This inaccuracy arose when the information provided to me was formatted and I apologise for that error. A corrected version of the table has been placed in the Parliament’s reference centre (Bib number 36401).
- Asked by: Stewart Stevenson, MSP for Banff and Buchan, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 April 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 5 May 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-14048 by Hugh Henry on 25 February 2005, whether it will publish an updated version of the answer reconciling the totals with the data in the table.
Answer
I can confirm that the information provided in my reply to question S2W – 14048 was inaccurate. This inaccuracy arose when the information provided to me was formatted and I apologise for that error. A corrected version of the table has been placed in Parliament’s reference Centre (Bib no. 36401).