- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 13 August 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what proportion of farmed salmon tested positive for the presence of malachite green in each year from 1998 to 2002.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S2W-1514 today. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 13 August 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive how many prosecutions for the use of malachite green in salmon farms there were in each year from 1998 to 2002.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has no functions in relation to testing for residues of veterinary medicines or any subsequent prosecutions.
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 8 August 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what consideration is given to the spread of sea lice in siting salmon farms.
Answer
The risks from, andmanagement of, sea lice are issues addressed by the environmental impactstatements, which accompany most new or modified fish farm development proposals.
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 8 August 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what research it is conducting into the spread of sea lice from salmon farms to the wild fish population.
Answer
The Fisheries ResearchServices Freshwater Laboratory is:
1. monitoring levels of sea liceat the mouths of rivers in west and north-west Scotland;
2. monitoring sea licelevels on juvenile sea trout returning to the river Shieldaig;
3. monitoring the numbers ofsea lice on wild sea trout in west and north-west Scotland (incollaboration with the Association of West Coast Fisheries Trusts); and
4. estimating the marinesurvival of sea trout in north west Scotland.
The Fisheries ResearchServices Marine Laboratory is:
1. monitoring open-water larvalsea lice levels in Loch Torridon; and
2. developing models toassess the effects of wind and tide on the movement of particles, and hencelarval sea lice
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 11 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 7 August 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive whether closing an area off the east coast in 2000 for promoting the recovery of sandeel and dependent sea bird populations has been effective and whether it would support any moves by the European Commission to make the closure permanent.
Answer
The closure of the Wee Bankie area to commercial sandeel fishing since 2000 cannot yet be demonstrated to have promoted the stability of local sea bird populations. There is an indication that the closure has benefited the discrete local sandeel population. The European Commission, with the support of the Scottish Executive, has proposed a further three years of closure in order to allow for further scientific monitoring of the closure and its effects.
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 11 June 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 2 July 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has received any representations in respect of any further closures of Church of Scotland care homes; what consideration it will give to this issue, and when it will do so.
Answer
A number of such representations have been made and are currently being considered. I refer the member to the answer given to question S2O-88 which is available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 3 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what costs will be incurred specifically as a result of relocating the headquarters of Scottish Natural Heritage to Inverness instead of to one of the options found to be more cost-effective in the report by the DTZ Group, Relocation Study for Scottish Natural Heritage.
Answer
The figures included in the report by DTZ Pieda represent the discounted values of a stream of costs and benefits of the various relocation options for Scottish Natural Heritage over a 30-year period. The figures contained in the DTZ Pieda report and subsequent analysis by officials have been placed in the Parliament's Reference Centre. In the context of the wider relocation policy objectives to enable the economic benefits of public sector jobs to be shared around all of Scotland's communities, ministers took the view that relocation to Inverness would bring benefits in terms of the development of the policy which would outweigh purely financial considerations.
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 3 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive why it selected the Inverness option for the relocation of the headquarters of Scottish Natural Heritage, in the light of the conclusion in the report by the DTZ Group, Relocation Study for Scottish Natural Heritage, that, on the basis of primary non-financial parameters, "the only location which can be discounted is Inverness".
Answer
The Scottish Executive's relocation policy is intended to ensure that public sector jobs, and the economic benefits that they bring, are shared across all of Scotland. The co-location of the two current Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) headquarter buildings to a single site away from the extremely competitive Edinburgh labour market will realise significant efficiency gains in the long term. SNH already has over 200 staff based in the Highlands and Islands and 50 staff located in Inverness. The move would therefore allow potential synergies to be explored. In addition, due to the profile and nature of its work, SNH is a better candidate than other organisations for location in the Highland area.
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 3 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive how the Inverness option for relocating the headquarters of Scottish Natural Heritage compared with other possible options in respect of "economic development need" in the assessment by the DTZ Group.
Answer
The assessment of economic development need of the relocation options considered in the DTZ Pieda study is shown in the table.
| Edinburgh | West Lothian | Stirling | Perth | Inverness |
Economic Development Need | Low | High | Low | Low | Medium |
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 2 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what proportion of staff in (a) the Executive as a whole, (b) its Environment and Rural Affairs Department, (c) the environment group of its Environment and Rural Affairs Department and (d) Scottish Natural Heritage is not based in Edinburgh.
Answer
The information requested is provided in the following table for civil servants of the Scottish Executive and staff of Scottish Natural Heritage:
Scottish Executive (Core Departments) | 22% |
Environment and Rural Affairs Department (ERAD) | 46% |
ERAD Environment Group | 0% |
Scottish Natural Heritage | 72% |