- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 March 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 26 March 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive what regulations relating to the sale of land owned by NHS Scotland would have to be amended to allow factors other than the size of the bid to be taken into account in any sale of such land.
Answer
To enable Scottish ministers to reflectfactors other than the best consideration when disposing of land used for the provisionof healthcare services by NHSScotland would require primary legislation and notthe amendment to existing regulations.
Section 79 of the 1978 act gives Scottish ministers the powerto dispose of land which is no longer required for the purposes under the 1978act but the act places no further obligations on Scottish ministers regarding thedisposal of NHSScotland property and there is no power to make regulations concerningthe disposal process or for other factors to be taken into account as part of thatprocess. Consequently if it was intended that Scottish ministers powers to disposeof NHSScotland property should be curtailed in some way then an amendment to the1978 act would be needed.
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 March 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 26 March 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive whether surplus NHS Scotland land must be sold to the highest bidder or whether benefits to the community, other than revenue, may be taken into account.
Answer
It is a mandatory requirement of theNHSScotland Property Transactions Handbook that NHSScotland bodies, when disposingof surplus property on behalf of Scottish ministers, do so at a price and on otherconditions which are the best which can be obtained at the time of disposal. Thisnormally involves advertising the property on the open market to ensure that thefull planning potential of the property is realised.
There are occasions when propertycan be sold at a price other than at full open market value; this is possible whenthere is a clearly identified health-related interest (a person or organisationproviding healthcare, social care services or some other form of community carecomplimentary to the services provided by a NHSScotland Body) which, if that interestacquired the property would offer significant financial or other advantages to NHSScotland.In these circumstances NHSScotland Bodies must carry out an appraisal of the benefitswhich might justify selling the property preferentially rather than establishingits full planning potential and concluding a sale following exposure on the openmarket.
Staff houses are also sold at discountedprices as NHSScotland bodies comply with the terms of the Governments right to buylegislation although tenants of such houses do not have a statutory right to purchase.
There is no requirement on NHSScotland bodies to consider widerbenefits to the community when disposing of surplus property, although as a matterof course NHSScotland bodies adhere to the Executives requirement to notify allother Departments, NDPBs and related bodies of the availability of surplus propertyprior to its exposure on the open market in order to ensure that Scottish ministersare not put in the position of competing on the open market to acquire for one functionproperty which is being sold because it is surplus to NHSScotland. Procedures haverecently been put in place to provide advance notification in such instances toenable other departments, NDPBs and related bodies to consider not only whetherthey have an interest in the property but also that they have the financial resourcesto complete a purchase. Where a positive expression of interest is lodged thereis a process in place to enable the purchase price to be determined which givesboth parties the opportunity to present submissions to an independent expert whosedecision is binding on both parties.
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 March 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Des McNulty on 20 March 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-31857 by Des McNulty on 22 February 2007 in respect of the number of private landlords registered under the Antisocial Behaviour etc. (Scotland) Act 2004, how many properties are covered by the applications awaiting determination and how many applications have been refused, broken down by local authority area.
Answer
The following table showsthe number of applications for registration approved and awaiting determinationby each local authority, as at 15 March 2007, and the number of propertiesassociated with these applications.
Local authorities arefollowing up landlords who have not yet applied for registration and some arepreparing, where necessary, to issue rent penalty notices, preventing thelandlord collecting rent. However, in most cases, the threat of a rent penaltynotice has been sufficient to secure an application. The majority of landlordsprovide an effective service to tenants and we therefore expect that mostapplications will be approved for registration. While no applications have yetbeen rejected, authorities are currently giving due consideration toapplications where there are concerns regarding the landlord.
Local Authority | Approved Registrations | Properties in Approved Registrations1 | Applications Awaiting Decision | Properties in Applications Awaiting Decision1 |
Aberdeen City | 1,289 | 2,297 | 7,160 | 9,196 |
Aberdeenshire | 618 | 831 | 3,202 | 5,245 |
Angus | 539 | 1,047 | 1,575 | 3,296 |
Argyll and Bute | 19 | 30 | 1,802 | 2,867 |
Clackmannanshire | 0 | 0 | 481 | 704 |
Dumfries and Galloway | 942 | 1,952 | 2,503 | 5,370 |
Dundee City | 1 | 1 | 2,903 | 6,829 |
East Ayrshire | 0 | 0 | 1,072 | 1,658 |
East Dunbartonshire | 155 | 135 | 719 | 679 |
East Lothian | 90 | 383 | 1,386 | 2,186 |
East Renfrewshire | 0 | 0 | 653 | 822 |
Edinburgh, City of | 0 | 0 | 20,943 | 27,118 |
Eilean Siar | 28 | 38 | 297 | 317 |
Falkirk | 931 | 1,328 | 1,317 | 1,919 |
Fife | 0 | 0 | 5,207 | 7,412 |
Glasgow City | 0 | 0 | 11,270 | 19,202 |
Highland | 3 | 7 | 3,747 | 5,465 |
Inverclyde | 0 | 0 | 974 | 1,898 |
Midlothian | 0 | 0 | 775 | 1,017 |
Moray | 0 | 0 | 1,271 | 1,914 |
North Ayrshire | 0 | 0 | 1,336 | 2,007 |
North Lanarkshire | 644 | 1,136 | 1,760 | 2,980 |
Orkney Islands | 666 | 760 | 679 | 799 |
Perth and Kinross | 856 | 1,243 | 2,658 | 5,999 |
Renfrewshire | 16 | 234 | 1,648 | 2,677 |
Scottish Borders, The | 109 | 171 | 2,270 | 4,841 |
Shetland Islands | 103 | 97 | 240 | 328 |
South Ayrshire | 624 | 1,053 | 1,503 | 2,230 |
South Lanarkshire | 32 | 40 | 2,527 | 3,691 |
Stirling | 127 | 296 | 1,417 | 2,351 |
West Dunbartonshire | 15 | 22 | 559 | 733 |
West Lothian | 1,063 | 1,493 | 1,788 | 2,338 |
Scotland | 8,870 | 14,594 | 87,642 | 136,088 |
Note: 1. Some properties maybe included more than once where applications from joint owners are atdifferent stages.
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 05 March 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 16 March 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it is monitoring the progress of public transport quality partnerships and quality contracts and whether it is aware of any problems arising from difficulties in creating quality contracts between bus companies and local authorities.
Answer
The recent bus policy reviewconcluded that a step change is required in the quality of bus serviceprovision and infrastructure. The outcomes of the review are contained in Movinginto the future – An Action Plan for Buses which was launched in December 2006as part of the National Transport Strategy. One of the actions included in the ActionPlan is a review of the legislation on Quality Partnerships to simplify theprocess and increase the benefits to the passenger.
Again as part of the Bus ActionPlan, in order to support franchising where there is marketfailure, there will be a review of the legislation on Quality Contracts tosimplify the process to be followed by transport authorities.
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 05 March 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 15 March 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it considers that forestry should be covered by the provisions of the Gangmasters (Licensing) Act 2004 and what representations it will make to Her Majesty’s Government on the matter.
Answer
Forestry work is covered by the Gangmasters LicensingAuthority licensing scheme under the definition of agriculture. Agriculture isdefined in the Gangmasters (Licensing) Act 2004 using the same definition usedin the Agricultural Wages Act 1948.A copy of the joint statement between the GangmastersLicensing Authority, Forestry Commission and the Northern Ireland Forest Servicewhich provides further guidance on how the Gangmasters Licensing Authorityslicensing scheme affects the forestry industry is available on the GangmastersLicensing Authority website
http://www.gla.gov.uk/embedded_object.asp?id=1013074.
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 16 February 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 2 March 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive how many affordable homes were built between March 2005 and March 2006, also broken down by local authority area.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S2W-29212 on 6 November 2006. All answers to writtenparliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facilityfor which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 16 February 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 2 March 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive (a) how many second homes there were in each local authority area, (b) how many local authorities charged 90% council tax on second homes and (c) how much income could have been raised by each local authority in council tax on second homes if charged at the maximum permitted amount, in the most recent year available.
Answer
The answers to questions (a)to (c) are shown in the following table:
| Number of Second Homes1 | Second Homes Discount 2005-06 | Estimated Income With Minimum 10% Discount Applied (£000) |
(a) | (b) | (c) |
Aberdeen City | 1,701 | 10% | 1,685 |
Aberdeenshire | 1,406 | 10% | 1,356 |
Angus | 429 | 10% | 358 |
Argyll and Bute | 3,655 | 10% | 3,323 |
Clackmannanshire | 364 | 50% | 288 |
Dumfries and Galloway | 1,746 | 10% | 1,466 |
Dundee City | 1,495 | 50% | 1,244 |
East Ayrshire | 153 | 50% | 134 |
East Dunbartonshire | 146 | 50% | 164 |
East Lothian | 246 | 10% | 272 |
East Renfrewshire | 95 | 50% | 105 |
Edinburgh, City of | 3,459 | 10% | 3,718 |
Eilean Siar | 843 | 10% | 550 |
Falkirk | 550 | 10% | 419 |
Fife | 3,678 | 10% | 3,423 |
Glasgow City | 1,041 | 50% | 1,131 |
Highland | 5,835 | 10% | 5,403 |
Inverclyde | 243 | 10% | 233 |
Midlothian | 91 | 10% | 90 |
Moray | 574 | 10% | 472 |
North Ayrshire | 1,543 | 10% | 1,319 |
North Lanarkshire | 319 | 10% | 251 |
Orkney Islands | 369 | 10% | 249 |
Perth and Kinross | 1,759 | 10% | 1,798 |
Renfrewshire | 1,162 | 50% | 930 |
Scottish Borders | 1,032 | 10% | 889 |
Shetland Islands | 169 | 10% | 107 |
South Ayrshire | 679 | 25% | 663 |
South Lanarkshire | 561 | 10% | 471 |
Stirling | 630 | 10% | 700 |
West Dunbartonshire | 131 | 50% | 112 |
West Lothian | 63 | 10% | 64 |
Scotland | 36,167 | | 33,384 |
Source: 2006 Council Tax taxbasereturns made to Scottish Executive.
Notes:
(a) The number of second homedwellings in each local authority is outlined in the table.
(b) There were 23 localauthorities that gave a 10% discount on council tax bills for properties that weresecond homes.
(c) The estimated amount of incomegiven in column c applies a 10% discount across all local authorities for secondhomes. This is calculated by multiplying the total billed amount (including a 10%discount) by the expected payment factor, estimated by each local authority intheir Council Tax Assumptions (CTAS) return.
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 13 February 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 1 March 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive what regulations relating to the sale of surplus land owned by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) would require to be amended to allow factors, other than the size of the bid, to be taken into account in any sale of SNH land.
Answer
Scottish Natural Heritage isbound by its Management Statement and Financial Memorandum, andis subject to the requirements of the Scottish Public Finance Manual,which requires that public bodies obtain the best price reasonably availablefor disposal of any surplus properties.
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 13 February 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 1 March 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive whether surplus land owned by Scottish Natural Heritage must be sold to the highest bidder or whether benefits to the community, other than revenue, may be taken into account.
Answer
Scottish Natural Heritage isbound by its Management Statement and Financial Memorandum which states thatland must be sold for the best price, taking into account any costs of sale,and in accordance with the guidance in the relevant section of the ScottishPublic Finance Manual (SPFM).
Recent changes to the SPFM allowfor an “internal advertising” of surplus property to the wider public sector. Thisprovides a mechanism for the transfer – at full market value – of property heldwithin the public sector.
- Asked by: Robin Harper, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 13 February 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 27 February 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive whether local authorities may use compulsory purchase orders to buy land owned by Scottish Natural Heritage for the sites of new schools.
Answer
Local authorities may use compulsorypurchase orders under the Acquisition of Land Act 1947 to buy land owned by ScottishNatural Heritage.